« Meet David Hicks and his Beleaguered Counsel | Blog Index | Scooter Libby's Unpardonable Fundraiser »
Up Next for Libby: How to Get Pardoned
The pressing question for Scooter Libby, now that he's been convicted on four of the five counts against him and faces 25 years in prison, is how to get off the hook. Who will pardon him and when? The answer to the first question is Bush, probably, but would W. really do it in the middle of the 2008 presidential campaign? That would surely sink the already rickety Republican ship.
Libby is to be sentenced in June and cynical professionals in Washington don't expect him to do any jail time. They know he'll get off one way or another. Key pardons of the past:
-- James Ridgeway
Posted by Jonathan Stein on 03/06/07 at 10:18 AM | E-mail | Print | Digg | de.licio.us | Reddit | Newsvine | Yahoo! MyWeb | StumbleUpon | Netscape | Google |
Comments
I don't think the Republican Party will allow Bush to pardon Libby. He may do so, in spite of them, as he leaves office, but until then he would be foolish to do so.
The foundation of the Shrub-Dub house of cards has been undermined by Cheney throwing Libby to the dogs and hoping there would be no conviction.
I do believe that the next indictment will be Cheney (if he doesn't die off first) and then Shrub-Dub. There is no more fodder to toss in front of the cannons.
Posted by: D. Glen Jackson on 03/06/07 at 6:52 PM
Dubya not pardon his best buddies Pal ... surely you jest
It is inevitable. So long as
cronyism exists a person in
Libbys postion could be found
guilty of cannabalism and the latest ventriloquist dummy at
the top will excuse his actions with some rationalization. And then twenty college professors will add their textpert opinions and an intellectualization will have been authored.
Government is the shadow cast by big business making big bucks. Just ask the Iraqi's
Posted by: Douglas F Maliszewski on 03/07/07 at 5:56 AM
If Scooter Libby gets a pardon. Vow. What does that say of your democracy? What does that say of the rule of law and "Justice" in the United States of America. Precedent setting is it not? A President can ask a subordinate in HIS administration to commit perjury on HIS behalf. Thus it is a PREMEDITATED CRIME and a PREMEDITATED PARDON. The President wants an official to commit a crime and guarantees that same official a GET OUT OF JAIL FREE CARD. What a farce for American justice. Justice is no longer blind in America.
Is your president & his men above the law? It would indeed seem that way.
ALL THE PRESIDENTS MEN, PART II.
(All animals are equal. But some animals are more equal than others.)
Posted by: Paul Malouf on 03/07/07 at 2:12 PM
ARCHIVE
September 9, 2007 - September 15, 2007
September 2, 2007 - September 8, 2007
August 26, 2007 - September 1, 2007
August 19, 2007 - August 25, 2007
August 12, 2007 - August 18, 2007
August 5, 2007 - August 11, 2007
July 29, 2007 - August 4, 2007
April 22, 2007 - April 28, 2007
April 15, 2007 - April 21, 2007
April 8, 2007 - April 14, 2007
March 25, 2007 - March 31, 2007
March 18, 2007 - March 24, 2007
March 11, 2007 - March 17, 2007
March 4, 2007 - March 10, 2007
February 25, 2007 - March 3, 2007
February 18, 2007 - February 24, 2007
February 11, 2007 - February 17, 2007
February 4, 2007 - February 10, 2007
January 28, 2007 - February 3, 2007
January 21, 2007 - January 27, 2007
January 14, 2007 - January 20, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
The Petraeus/Crocker Report: It's Crocker Time! (Part Three) (1)
Ames Tideman wrote:
The testimony was a complete mess. ...
[more]
Scientific Proof That Liberals Are Smarter (4)
MoonDragon wrote:
Can we bias any study to show a tendency for desired resul...
[more]
Protesters in Berkeley: Up a Tree and Fenced In (13)
Brian K wrote:
Kirilovslogic,
Wow. Im not talking about sucking up to th...
[more]
NRA Offers Free Memberships to Soldiers (Step Up, Costco) (17)
Brian K wrote:
Sneezer,
First of all it is NOT his "topic sentance" it is...
[more]
MoveOn, Anbar, and Lantos: Final Thoughts on the Petraeus and Crocker Hearing (1)
Eric Ferguson wrote:
You're not too deep in the weeds on that point about Irani...
[more]
Chuck Hagel, Next SecDef? (4)
bob t wrote:
Wes Clark(Catholic) would be my first choice, but Hagel co...
[more]
Scientific Proof That Liberals Are Not Smarter (4)
Eric Ferguson wrote:
The message intended was a good one, because Petraeus has ...
[more]
Happy Anniversary, Katrina Victims! You Could Celebrate With Cash if You Weren't So Unscrupulous (5)
jah wrote:
I was annoyed by your title, but i understand and relate t...
[more]
White House Advisor Appears to Taunt Bin Laden (10)
Jaime Galarza wrote:
It reminds me of the now infamous "Bring them on" comment....
[more]
Donald Rumsfeld: Not Done Lying! (3)
Jonathan Stein wrote:
Yes, Dan....
[more]
Movable Type 3.33
Johnathan,
I think you're reaching a bit. You can't lump Vietnam War protestors with the likes of Gerald Ford and GHW Bush. The former were principled and moral; they didn't avoid responsibility for what they did. The latter, on the other hand, were all about irresponsibility, with Ford leading the way. Once he pardoned Nixon it was a land rfush toward irresponsibility.
Will Libby get off? Sure, just like the generals who perpetrated the atrocities at Walter Reed. Sure, everyone's lost their jobs, but their cushy pensions'll soften the blow. Kinda like being sent to your room where you can still play with your iPod, PC, game counsel, etc.
Now, if these perps were of a minority race holding up a convenience or liquor store...
Posted by: David Culver on 03/06/07 at 3:10 PM