« U.S. Attorney Update: Domenici Lawyers Up | Blog Index | Raise Your Hand if You Hate Maureen Dowd! »
It's Time for Hagel-Huckabee '08, Folks
Matt Yglesias has a typically great takedown of the Big Three Republican contenders, Giuliani, McCain, and Romney, over at the American Prospect. There's nothing new to report, but Yglesias illustrates why they are all basically ineligible for the Republican nomination with economy and some good humor ("Mitt Romney is the most freakishly transparent liar I've ever witnessed."). It's worth a read. I'll highlight one particularly insightful point here:
Given that they're all viewed skeptically by cultural conservatives, the only possible way for any of them to campaign for the nomination is with an escalating race to the right on national security, even though Iraq just led the GOP to disaster last November. Which vulnerable state that Bush won in 2004 is rendered more secure by making the Republican Party less committed to social conservatism but more committed to the Iraq project? Ohio? Virginia? Missouri? Nevada? Iowa? I don't see it. [Emphasis his.]
Yup, they're all screwed. That's why I've come to realize that a ticket with Mike Huckabee and Chuck Hagel would pretty much be unstoppable. I'm thinking Hagel for president because he has war experience, much better teeth, and is currently right on the biggest issue, Iraq. I'm thinking Huckabee for vice president because he seems cuddly (he doesn't swear!) and was a preacher for a long time. Also, he wrote a self-help book about losing weight and is named Huckabee, two things that probably disqualify him from the presidency.
By the way, I'm not really joking. In a week, there will be a Newsweek article about these two forming a ticket. Just watch.
Posted by Jonathan Stein on 03/07/07 at 2:07 PM | E-mail | Print | Digg | de.licio.us | Reddit | Newsvine | Yahoo! MyWeb | StumbleUpon | Netscape | Google |
Comments
Let's not get paranoid about the AIS connection.
Posted by: Shari on 03/07/07 at 6:30 PM
That would be a dynamic ticket. It would be strong on executive experience, foreign and domestic policy. The two of them would appeal to the social conservatives and to the fiscal conservatives as well (something that Huckabee has had trouble with).
I like it.
Posted by: Charlie on 03/07/07 at 7:48 PM
Paranoia involves delusion. Hagel, along with some Dominionist Christians, owned a voting machine company. Using that company's machines, he won a landslide election that he was predicted to either lose or very narrowly win. He then took his AIS affiliation off of his resume. There has never been an adequate explanation for any of this, as far as I know, so I'm not sure what the delusion would be.
Posted by: Diane on 03/07/07 at 8:06 PM
People win all the time when they were expected to lose. Look at Truman and Kennedy. Let us judge people on the issues. Ms. Clinton left a string of bodies according to some. Chavez(owns voting machine company) is also suppose to take credit for the 06 Democratic win, I guess that paranoia is not confined to right wing wackos.
Posted by: Shari on 03/08/07 at 6:40 AM
"Look at...Kennedy." Exactly.
I am not making a final judgment about Hagel; I just want the facts discussed instead of buried by the media. They are simply too provocative not to discuss, especially considering the court case against him. That has nothing to do with a system of delusions.
Posted by: Diane on 03/08/07 at 7:34 AM
ARCHIVE
September 9, 2007 - September 15, 2007
September 2, 2007 - September 8, 2007
August 26, 2007 - September 1, 2007
August 19, 2007 - August 25, 2007
August 12, 2007 - August 18, 2007
August 5, 2007 - August 11, 2007
July 29, 2007 - August 4, 2007
April 22, 2007 - April 28, 2007
April 15, 2007 - April 21, 2007
April 8, 2007 - April 14, 2007
March 25, 2007 - March 31, 2007
March 18, 2007 - March 24, 2007
March 11, 2007 - March 17, 2007
March 4, 2007 - March 10, 2007
February 25, 2007 - March 3, 2007
February 18, 2007 - February 24, 2007
February 11, 2007 - February 17, 2007
February 4, 2007 - February 10, 2007
January 28, 2007 - February 3, 2007
January 21, 2007 - January 27, 2007
January 14, 2007 - January 20, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
The Petraeus/Crocker Report: It's Crocker Time! (Part Three) (1)
Ames Tideman wrote:
The testimony was a complete mess. ...
[more]
Scientific Proof That Liberals Are Smarter (4)
MoonDragon wrote:
Can we bias any study to show a tendency for desired resul...
[more]
Protesters in Berkeley: Up a Tree and Fenced In (13)
Brian K wrote:
Kirilovslogic,
Wow. Im not talking about sucking up to th...
[more]
NRA Offers Free Memberships to Soldiers (Step Up, Costco) (17)
Brian K wrote:
Sneezer,
First of all it is NOT his "topic sentance" it is...
[more]
MoveOn, Anbar, and Lantos: Final Thoughts on the Petraeus and Crocker Hearing (1)
Eric Ferguson wrote:
You're not too deep in the weeds on that point about Irani...
[more]
Chuck Hagel, Next SecDef? (4)
bob t wrote:
Wes Clark(Catholic) would be my first choice, but Hagel co...
[more]
Scientific Proof That Liberals Are Not Smarter (4)
Eric Ferguson wrote:
The message intended was a good one, because Petraeus has ...
[more]
Happy Anniversary, Katrina Victims! You Could Celebrate With Cash if You Weren't So Unscrupulous (5)
jah wrote:
I was annoyed by your title, but i understand and relate t...
[more]
White House Advisor Appears to Taunt Bin Laden (10)
Jaime Galarza wrote:
It reminds me of the now infamous "Bring them on" comment....
[more]
Donald Rumsfeld: Not Done Lying! (3)
Jonathan Stein wrote:
Yes, Dan....
[more]
Movable Type 3.33
Given Hagel's AIS connection, it's actually pretty likely--and scary. All the so-called liberals who like Hagel tend to overlook this rather large part of his resume.
Posted by: Diane on 03/07/07 at 4:55 PM