«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
Birth Control Costs On Campus Double Thanks to Medicaid
The cost of birth control sold at student health centers on college campuses nationwide are skyrocketing and women can thank Medicaid for costs that have now doubled from around $10 a pack to $22 for a month's worth of pills. The price hike comes after of a change in a Medicaid rebate law that means pharmaceutical companies are no longer providing large discounts on some drugs to universities, including, surprise, contraceptives.
Previously, pharmaceutical companies often sold drugs at deep discounts to colleges, the discounts made business sense for the companies in that they created brand loyalty for the company, plus they didn't count against the drug makers in a formula calculating rebates they owed states to participate in Medicaid.
But the 2005 Medicaid bill, which went into effect in January, means that drug manufacturers who provide any discounts to colleges mean drug manufacturers need to pay more to participate in Medicaid. The result, fewer companies are offering discounts, meaning the pills are less affordable.
About 40% of female undergrads use oral contraceptives, according to a recent survey conducted by the American College Health Association. Many colleges tried to maintain costs for contraceptives for a few months by buying in bulk before the new law took effect, but now their stocks are low and they have had to increase prices.
ACHA said that the Medicaid bill should have included an exemption for companies to provide prescription drugs to college health centers and the group has supported a proposal to change the law. And for those who are anti-contraceptives, know that this rule change affects all discounts. For example, for the 16% of college students who have been diagnosed with depression—a 56% increase since 2000— their prescription costs are up as well.
Comments
Birth control prices on college campuses have increased upwards of 100% due the pharmaceutical industry’s response to actions undertaken by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). No matter who is at fault – CMS or the pharmaceutical industry – the health insurance industry, both private and public, should take note. Preventing pregnancies is far cheaper than the medical costs associated with unintended pregnancies.
Recent published research shows that the direct medical costs of unintended pregnancies in the United States were estimated to be $5 billion per year, while direct medical cost savings due to contraceptive use were estimated to be $19 billion[1].
Both Medicaid and the private health insurance industry are likely to spend significantly more for unintended pregnancies than they would have spent on contraceptive coverage. An ounce of prevention, indeed!
ARCHIVE
April 20, 2008 - April 26, 2008
April 13, 2008 - April 19, 2008
April 6, 2008 - April 12, 2008
March 30, 2008 - April 5, 2008
March 23, 2008 - March 29, 2008
March 16, 2008 - March 22, 2008
March 9, 2008 - March 15, 2008
February 24, 2008 - March 1, 2008
February 17, 2008 - February 23, 2008
February 10, 2008 - February 16, 2008
February 3, 2008 - February 9, 2008
January 27, 2008 - February 2, 2008
January 20, 2008 - January 26, 2008
January 13, 2008 - January 19, 2008
January 6, 2008 - January 12, 2008
December 30, 2007 - January 5, 2008
December 23, 2007 - December 29, 2007
December 16, 2007 - December 22, 2007
December 9, 2007 - December 15, 2007
December 2, 2007 - December 8, 2007
November 25, 2007 - December 1, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
Intelligence Briefing on the Hill Today (19)
oyun wrote:
Teşekkürler .....
[more]
Some Surprising New Findings on GIs, PTSD, and Crime (1)
smitisan wrote:
When I was in basic back in 71, we had a lot of guys claim...
[more]
High Gas Prices Save Lives (5)
CitizenWhale wrote:
No one drives at 55mph, and it is a known fact that there ...
[more]
Preteens on the Pill? (11)
Scott james wrote:
My Sister Samantha turns 10 years old next week and She wi...
[more]
Interesting Fact About Wisconsin Election Results (3)
antra jolly wrote:
This article includes all the details related to the Wisco...
[more]
About That "Dems Must Win West Virginia" Argument... (5)
Nelson wrote:
This is miraculous news that people forget that Bill Clint...
[more]
Why Talula Does the Hula No More (1)
rob wrote:
you forgot to mention children called midnight chardonnay,...
[more]
Obama in Berlin: Another Great Communicator? (9)
Jeff Hardy wrote:
It is about time we had few one like this representation A...
[more]
No Good Veep Choices for McCain? (5)
dorkey wrote:
The vice presidential buzz is mounting, and many think a p...
[more]
Iraq Contract Fraud: Senators Call For Arrests, Recovery of Funds (14)
Oyun wrote:
Stuff like this has been going on and on for years and yea...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


Posted by: Wayne C. Shields & James Trussell, PhD on 03/27/07 at 8:37 AM Respond