«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
Banning Gay Adoption Would Cost Foster Care System $130 Million
Half a million children in the U.S. live in foster care, and more than 100,000 await adoption. Finding stable, permanent homes for these youth, "forever families," is a priority, and a proven way to positive outcomes for youth. Still, it's up to states to recruit and evaluate potential foster and adoptive parents, and most states turn away viable parents who happen to be lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender.
Currently three states—Florida, Mississippi and Utah—have outright bans on adoptive parents who are homosexual. Several other states have or are considering policies that would restrict LGBT couples and individuals from fostering or adopting a child. Florida forbids "homosexuals" from adopting; Mississippi bans "same-gender" couples, and Utah bans all unmarried couples.
Some states: California, Maryland, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Connecticut, Illinois, Indiana, Pennsylvania, Vermont and Washington DC, actually protect potential adopters by prohibiting sexual orientation from being used as a basis to prevent a prospective applicant from being a adoptive or foster parent.
But throughout most of the country LGBT folks face all kinds of barriers to adoption. This, despite the fact that they are already raising children in significant numbers. According to census figures, gathered by the Williams Institute in a new study released today:
-More than one in three lesbians has given birth, and one in six gay men have fathered a child.
-65,500 adopted children are currently living with a lesbian or gay parent, amounting to four percent of all adopted children in the United States.
-10,300 foster children are living with lesbian or gay parents.
-Nearly 52,000 lesbian and gay households include an adopted child under the age of 18.
The study finds that not only can homosexuals be parents, they can be good parents! They have many of the traits states specifically seek out in foster and adoptive parents: They are, on average, older, more educated and have more economic resources than other foster and adoptive parents.
If states enact laws that prevent such adoptions children currently placed with existing LGBT foster parents would be removed from those families. Nationally, an estimated 9,300 to 14,000 children would be displaced.
Aside from the psychological and other harm that would come from displacement (fewer foster care placements are associated with better school achievement, greater life satisfaction, greater overall stability, more placements with higher rates of juvenile detention, etc.), there is a pure economic argument to be made here for allowing gay foster and adoptive parenting. Like banning gay marriage, the the economic cost of banning LGBT people from adopting and fostering would be significant. Williams Institute estimates that a national ban on gay adoption would result in costs to the foster care system of up to $130 million.
The price to pay, some say, for "family values."
Comments
I guess it's better to have two dads or moms rather than a crappy mom and dad raising a kid. However, I think it's best for a kid to have the influence of BOTH a MOM and a DAD- I think it shapes kids on how they end up in life- I know I've learned different things from my mom and dad and this is important. I guess if this is not an option, a homosexual couple is the next best thing. However, this will soon be a thing of the past- a doctor in Sweden is developing a way for men to have anal babies- very fascinating research going on here. This will change the whole dynamic of the family once men can rear children out their ass. C-Section, anyone?
I think it's funny that the same people who hasten to argue that some gay men are far too "effeminant" and some lesbians are too "butch" turn right around and say that _all_ gays are too masculine to be good role models in a motheresque role and _all_ lesbians are too feminine to be good role models in a fatheresque role.
I see so many single-parent households, and households with a mother and father where one or the other is completely absent, and the percentage of these children who turn out "good," in comparison to "good" children from "normal" families tends, in my observations, to be the same. It matters less what your parents have between their legs and more how much love and support they show you.
Until we can wrap our feeble little human minds around this, and stop denying it in typical United Statesian fashion, then this rather stupid conundrum will continue.
Posted by: Austin on 03/27/07 at 11:56 AM Respond
I was raised by a transgender homosexual pack of wolves and I turned out okay.
Austin is right- it's not about what is in between the legs but rather the love in heart. Love in the heart can bring oneness to the world and compassion. My heart radiates love upon thee, the world I shine my love upon thee. My heart gushes love and openness- I am a dolpin swimming in a sea of harmony.
Posted by: Adopted By Wolves on 03/27/07 at 12:08 PM Respond
Society needs to open its eyes in some states. There are too many children in foster care now that are dying to have parents. Not all male and female couples raise children successfully and give them loving homes. How often are children molested by neighbors, parents,uncles, aunts etc. in such homes? Just because a person choses a different lifestyle does not mean they cannot raise a child.
I was raised in a strict Mississippi home, but have since moved to different parts of the country and formed my own opinions. My daughter I adopted was a lesbian for years and was in a relationship with a woman who had two children and my daughter had a child herself. They were both good parents. They even talked about marriage but were scared to go through with it for they feared their kids would be taken from them. Children need love, guidence, teachings of right and wrong, etc. Its not right to deny someone the privilege to be a parent because of their gender or lifestyle.
Posted by: Sally on 05/12/07 at 2:37 PM Respond
A child needs a mother and a father.
Which is why the government should ban divorce. And any behavior that might lead to one or both parents dying before the child has reached the age of majority.
We should also bring back the Biblical provisions about marrying your brother's widow, just to make sure that every child has a mother and a father.
Which they need.
Posted by: Patrick on 05/14/07 at 12:51 PM Respond
i agree,but its strange to me that someone would think that because you sleep with the same sex all your friends are also the same sex.(children need a male and female role model) i agree they do and i know plenty of gay couples who have very very close bonds with friends of the opposite sex..how come they do not fall under a role model?
Posted by: mel on 05/18/07 at 10:00 AM Respond
i think that being gay is wrong and they should all be put on an island with a giant jar of vasoline
Posted by: alex on 07/31/07 at 5:51 PM Respond
I think that being alex is wrong, and that every alex should be dipped in vaseline and put on an island with half-a-dozen very butch ex-cons.
Posted by: TrickyDick on 08/01/07 at 8:52 AM Respond
Love is all that matters. It can come from homosexuals and be denied by heterosexuals. Love itself has no biases. It flourishes where ever it is welcomed. I don't care who loves whom. I just wish that everyone could be loved.
Jaye
Posted by: jaye on 11/27/07 at 11:39 AM Respond
an old thread here, that i had unfortunately missed
it was good to find my state listed among those that prevent the use of sexual orientation in determining who is a suitable parent
were it not, i think i'd be harrassing my state legislators and writing letters to the editors of local newspapers on the issue
Posted by: jet on 11/27/07 at 1:18 PM Respond
I think that gay and lesbians should boycott doing foster care and then let's see how many "straight" couples come rushing forward to take care of the 9300 to 14,000 special needs children that would be displaced.
Posted by: Irritated In Wisconsin on 12/20/07 at 12:47 PM Respond
hmm people keep it comming im doing a research for gay adoption if anyone has a statistic or some polls for how many gays, man and woman who agree upon these arguement please do post it..
Posted by: George Lopez on 01/31/08 at 9:06 AM Respond
If someone is a good parent they are a good parent, if they pass the “screening” process then they pass, there is no debating that fact. So, why cant homosexuals adopt in some states when if they would go through the “screening” process they would pass? Well, its because people are stupid and they think that they are higher on the totem poll then everyone else. It would save the United States $130 MILLION. Everyone is trying to save money so why not pass a law that would give someone the freedom that they deserve and save them money? I just don’t understand I guess. I mean, if you read all the research it says that a child raised by a homosexual couple turns out just as “normal” as a child who came from a heterosexual couple. I mean, it saves money and there is no harm in it? So, why not? I guess that will always be a question pondering in my head. I was raised by one parent, my mom, I saw my dad every once in a while, but avoided him at all costs does that make me not “normal”? Then, I guess 50% of Americans are not going to be normal because the divorce rate is so high, yes some can remarry but still, that’s again a different house situation. Hopefully, one day the stuck up politicians and the greedy Americans will get their heads out of their asses and they will finally come to the conclusion that homosexuals can adopt and start a family that they have always been wanting. It’s the only right thing to do, allow people the rights that they deserve.
Posted by: Sarah on 05/06/08 at 8:11 AM Respond
ARCHIVE
April 20, 2008 - April 26, 2008
April 13, 2008 - April 19, 2008
April 6, 2008 - April 12, 2008
March 30, 2008 - April 5, 2008
March 23, 2008 - March 29, 2008
March 16, 2008 - March 22, 2008
March 9, 2008 - March 15, 2008
February 24, 2008 - March 1, 2008
February 17, 2008 - February 23, 2008
February 10, 2008 - February 16, 2008
February 3, 2008 - February 9, 2008
January 27, 2008 - February 2, 2008
January 20, 2008 - January 26, 2008
January 13, 2008 - January 19, 2008
January 6, 2008 - January 12, 2008
December 30, 2007 - January 5, 2008
December 23, 2007 - December 29, 2007
December 16, 2007 - December 22, 2007
December 9, 2007 - December 15, 2007
December 2, 2007 - December 8, 2007
November 25, 2007 - December 1, 2007
November 18, 2007 - November 24, 2007
November 11, 2007 - November 17, 2007
November 4, 2007 - November 10, 2007
October 28, 2007 - November 3, 2007
October 21, 2007 - October 27, 2007
October 14, 2007 - October 20, 2007
October 7, 2007 - October 13, 2007
September 30, 2007 - October 6, 2007
September 23, 2007 - September 29, 2007
September 16, 2007 - September 22, 2007
September 9, 2007 - September 15, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
Banning Gay Adoption Would Cost Foster Care System $130 Million (13)
Sarah wrote:
If someone is a good parent they are a good parent, if the...
[more]
McCain Wants a League of What Now? (3)
Gary wrote:
Watch the video all the way to the end. His wisecrack abou...
[more]
Politics, Pandering, and Policy at the Pump: Who Wins? (43)
Sharon Ash wrote:
Where I live, they waive the State sales tax for one weeke...
[more]
Clinton Smears Obama on Iraq — Again (112)
izolasyon wrote:
fgfgfd...
[more]
RumInt: New Bush Iran Finding? (12)
Walter wrote:
MarthaA, the New American Century group are neocon Zionist...
[more]
The Weekly Standard Does Not Have the Democrats' Best Interests At Heart (10)
TheRealFish wrote:
Correction: Apologies for being energized early this morni...
[more]
Awkward Sports Metaphor of the Day (5)
MarthaA wrote:
kathy giannini:
This is a primary campaign, but Obama wil...
[more]
Clinton on Iraq: Got Some Explaining to Do? (3)
researcher wrote:
there is a sucker born every minute in this case there is ...
[more]
In Case You Forgot John Bolton Is Crazy (2)
ff11 wrote:
Bolton is not crazy, only evil.
He is the American equiva...
[more]
NYC's New Reefer Madness (23)
Guav wrote:
"I think it's amazing that Guav sites a comment by his wif...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


Posted by: Better than nothing on 03/27/07 at 11:17 AM Respond