MoJo Blog

« Gov't Watchdogs Call the OSC's Rove Investigation Dead in the Water | Blog Index | Guess How Many People are Running for President? (Now Add One More) »

Rare Lung Disease Found In Food-Flavoring Plant Employees

Bronchiolitis obliterans, a rare, life-threatening lung disease, has been found in eight in eight individuals who worked in California food-flavoring plants between 2003 and 2007. Contracting this disease was apparently the result of inhaling diacetyl, which is also linked to the occurrence of bronchiolitis obliterans in people who work in the microwave popcorn industry.

And the latest issue of Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report indicates that women who work in battery manufacturing plants have elevated lead levels.

"Bronchiolitis obliterans is a severe lung disease that can be prevented with appropriate measures, such as engineering controls, work practices, medical surveillance, and a respiratory protection program," according to report co-author Dr. Rachael Bailey, an epidemic intelligence service officer at the CDC's National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

There are no regulations governing U.S. food flavoring plants.

Posted by Diane E. Dees on 04/26/07 at 5:28 PM | E-mail | Print | Digg | de.licio.us | Reddit | Newsvine | Yahoo! MyWeb | StumbleUpon | Netscape | Google |



Comments

So I guess OSHA doesn't apply to U.S. food flavoring plants? Way to be a journalist there Diane.

Posted by: * on 04/28/07 at 1:30 PM

That is correct: There are no standards, including OSHA standards, that apply to food flavoring plants. Obviously, you have not kept up with the changes in OSHA.

And thank you.

Posted by: Diane on 04/28/07 at 4:43 PM

"That is correct: There are no standards, including OSHA standards, that apply to food flavoring plants. Obviously, you have not kept up with the changes in OSHA."

Nice try. Your original post said "There are no regulations governing U.S. food flavoring plants". That is what I was responding to, as it is a straightforwardly ludicrous claim. These businesses are very much regulated by OSHA. That is why OSHA has the authority to inspect these food flavoring plants, as they did after the latest controversy arose.

However, when you say that there is no "standard" that OSHA has set regarding exposures in these food flavoring plants, which means that they do not have to set exposure levels for the food additives to which employees are exposed, you are absolutely correct. In particular, there is no standard set for exposure to diacetyl, which you noted is the likely culprit in these cases. I'm no epidemiologist, but clearly the distribution of cases of this rare disease are evidence enough that OSHA needs to move on diacetyl exposure, and set an exposure level immediately. Furthermore, they should have set an exposure level seven years ago, after NIOSH deemed it to be the likely cause of similar illnesses in Missouri.

FWIW, I am intimately familiar with OSHA from my days doing microbiology research, and I have been mostly in favor of its shift to a hands-off approach under the Bush Admin, having seen some of the ludicrous time-wasting consequences of aspects of the regulatory environment it creates. However, this case clearly is a failure on the agency's part. I don't think you are at all wrong to take it to task, or to lay the responsibility at the Bush Administration's feet. I just believe you clearly overstated your case in a feeble attempt at an Upton Sinclair moment, and in so doing showed poor journalistic principles. There is a difference between "there are no regulations governing U.S. food flavoring plants" and "OSHA failed to set an exposure level for a flavoring additive that they had good reason to believe was dangerous to workers" that a journalist should be cognizant of.

On the other hand, it's not like you are covering Anna Nicole and Paris nonstop, so you deserve some credit.

Posted by: * on 05/01/07 at 1:25 AM

Post a comment





 

RECENT COMMENTS

The Petraeus/Crocker Report: It's Crocker Time! (Part Three) (1)
Ames Tideman wrote: The testimony was a complete mess. ... [more]

Scientific Proof That Liberals Are Smarter (4)
MoonDragon wrote: Can we bias any study to show a tendency for desired resul... [more]

Protesters in Berkeley: Up a Tree and Fenced In (13)
Brian K wrote: Kirilovslogic, Wow. Im not talking about sucking up to th... [more]

NRA Offers Free Memberships to Soldiers (Step Up, Costco) (17)
Brian K wrote: Sneezer, First of all it is NOT his "topic sentance" it is... [more]

MoveOn, Anbar, and Lantos: Final Thoughts on the Petraeus and Crocker Hearing (1)
Eric Ferguson wrote: You're not too deep in the weeds on that point about Irani... [more]

Chuck Hagel, Next SecDef? (4)
bob t wrote: Wes Clark(Catholic) would be my first choice, but Hagel co... [more]

Scientific Proof That Liberals Are Not Smarter (4)
Eric Ferguson wrote: The message intended was a good one, because Petraeus has ... [more]

Happy Anniversary, Katrina Victims! You Could Celebrate With Cash if You Weren't So Unscrupulous (5)
jah wrote: I was annoyed by your title, but i understand and relate t... [more]

White House Advisor Appears to Taunt Bin Laden (10)
Jaime Galarza wrote: It reminds me of the now infamous "Bring them on" comment.... [more]

Donald Rumsfeld: Not Done Lying! (3)
Jonathan Stein wrote: Yes, Dan.... [more]

XML RSS Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.33

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com

















bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN


This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2007 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS