« MySpace Outrage Was a Bit off Base | Blog Index | Breaking: Wolfowitz Is Out »
Bush Opposes Pay Raises for Troops and Survivors
Last month, President Bush attacked congressional Democrats for depriving troops on the ground of funding by insisting on passing conditional funding bills they knew he would veto. Although Bush's claims were proven to be false—the war had already been funded through June, and even a long delay in reaching an agreement would only have caused the government a minor financial inconvenience—he continued to reiterate them, in the fashion of his Tourettes-inflicted vice president who could not stop saying that Saddam Hussein had something to do with 9/11.
Now the Democrats have proposed a boost in survivor's benefits and a pay increase for the troops, who are facing increased danger since Bush's congressionally opposed surge began. Bush is threatening to veto the gesture of mercy. The president says military pay and benefits are already adequate. But that's not what Mother Jones found (and documented) in our Iraq 101 package. A widow with 3 children receives just $40,000 a year. And soldier's pay is so low that a quarter of military spouses applied for food stamps in 2004.
Posted by Cameron Scott on 05/17/07 at 3:57 PM | E-mail | Print | Digg | de.licio.us | Reddit | Newsvine | Yahoo! MyWeb | StumbleUpon | Netscape | Google |
Comments
ARCHIVE
September 9, 2007 - September 15, 2007
September 2, 2007 - September 8, 2007
August 26, 2007 - September 1, 2007
August 19, 2007 - August 25, 2007
August 12, 2007 - August 18, 2007
August 5, 2007 - August 11, 2007
July 29, 2007 - August 4, 2007
April 22, 2007 - April 28, 2007
April 15, 2007 - April 21, 2007
April 8, 2007 - April 14, 2007
March 25, 2007 - March 31, 2007
March 18, 2007 - March 24, 2007
March 11, 2007 - March 17, 2007
March 4, 2007 - March 10, 2007
February 25, 2007 - March 3, 2007
February 18, 2007 - February 24, 2007
February 11, 2007 - February 17, 2007
February 4, 2007 - February 10, 2007
January 28, 2007 - February 3, 2007
January 21, 2007 - January 27, 2007
January 14, 2007 - January 20, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
More Bad News for Edwards, Obama (10)
MissDemeanor wrote:
I don't think John is being racist. I think John hates ev...
[more]
African Pentecostal Christians Destroying Ancient African Culture In Nigeria (18)
Muslim Watch wrote:
Mingora, 12 Sept. (AKI/DAWN) - In a grim reminder of the d...
[more]
Joe Lieberman is Now Almost Comically Hawkish (1)
Eric Ferguson wrote:
Petraeus' answer doesn't sound so much like "no" as like "...
[more]
One Special Dame: Remembering Anita Roddick (3)
Caroline Merriam wrote:
I knew Anita Roddick in Business for Social Responsibity. ...
[more]
Breaking: Sunni Tribal Leader Assassinated in Iraq (1)
Baghdad Mo wrote:
BAGHDAD, 13 (UPI) -- Al Qaida militants in Iraq have taken...
[more]
Ignite! Sparks More Controversy (3)
kirkbrew wrote:
You folks should look at this Ignite material. It is real...
[more]
Americans Fight Terrorism From the Jury Box (3)
gvc wrote:
Over the course of American history, juries made up of the...
[more]
Russia Explodes 'Father of All Bombs' (1)
Lin Geary wrote:
About comparing bomb sizes...The real Father of all Bombs ...
[more]
ABC News Investigates (Itself) (3)
LobaGirl wrote:
Unlike the university system in the US, higher education i...
[more]
NRA Offers Free Memberships to Soldiers (Step Up, Costco) (23)
Brian K wrote:
gvc,
Good point. It had stuck in my head as refering to bl...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33
It is quite clear that Bush is a sociopathic and sadistic. He delights at the misfortune and suffering of others. Why would he or any Republican, given the core values of the Republican party, ever want to do the right thing for anyone other than themselves. The Republican party is the party of things not the party of people.
Pope Leo XIII(Rerum Novarum) advocated for social justice and against rampant capitalism, unlike the Catholic church, my church, of today which endorses and supports the Republican party and it's war against people. I'll take Pope Leo and Thomas Merton and the Republicans can have John Paul II and Benedict XVI. Caring for people is 'the right thing to do' while endlessly supporting the rich and keeping the Latin american peoples in poverty or the troops on inadequate(Walter Reed etc) support for the rest of their lives is 'the wrong thing to do'. The Vietnam troops were denied adequate care and the very same thing is happening all over again.
WWJD. Jesus would never support war of any kind for any reason he would always demand diplomacy, something Bush and his republicans just hate. Imperialism, be it religious or political(Republican) just rolls on and over dead and maimed bodies, US troops, Afghani and Iraqi citizens. And we are going to teach them democracy, methinks not. Unless one calls it religious and republican party democracy.
Sorry for two posts.
Posted by: bobt on 05/18/07 at 9:31 PM