« The Numbers Add Up on U.S. Attorneys Firing Scandal | Blog Index | Cheney Distorts Views of Arab Leaders, Version 2.0 »
War Czar as Figurehead? Errand Boy? Bush's Messenger?
Michael Hirsh writes in Newsweek that new war czar Lt. Gen. Douglas Lute faces almost insurmountable problems in his new job, problems that will essentially reduce him to being a high profile mouthpiece for the White House. He'll be the public face of the war effort, and he'll ferry the president's orders to various departments around Washington, but he won't be coordinating any fighting. Or giving orders to anyone, really.
Says Hirsh:
[Lute is] just a three-star general, and he’s still on active duty. What this means is that while nominally he’s the president’s man—his title puts him on par with national-security adviser Steven Hadley—militarily he’s still inferior in rank to four-star Gen. Peter Pace, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs, and Gen. David Petraeus, commander of the multinational forces in Iraq. Neither will he be in a position to tell Defense Secretary Robert Gates or Rice what to do. "The term 'war czar' is terribly misguided," says [retired Gen. Barry] McCaffrey. "I do think he’ll be an extremely able White House operative."
Hirsh also notes that Bush is setting the poor guy up to fail. After all, if you're a messenger for an inattentive president who has no substantive messages to deliver, how can you possibly hope to improve things?
The only way for Lute to be even marginally effective is if a president who has been consistently uninterested in the details of the Iraq conflict for the past four years—and in the nitty-gritty of Afghanistan for most of the last five years—starts obsessing over those details with just 18 months to go in his term. And that’s unlikely to happen.
We wrote at the onset of the surge that assigning the smart-as-a-whip General Petraeus to lead the fighting in Iraq was like throwing good money after bad -- we were wasting a huge portion of the Army's talent on a lost cause. And when that talent inevitably goes down swinging in September 2007 or February 2008 or whenever, the Bushies can say they did all they could. The situation with Lute feels very much the same. Perhaps that's why the White House had so much trouble finding someone to fill the post.
Should have hired this guy.
Posted by Jonathan Stein on 05/18/07 at 8:56 AM | E-mail | Print | Digg | de.licio.us | Reddit | Newsvine | Yahoo! MyWeb | StumbleUpon | Netscape | Google |
Comments
The job was created specifically to provide a convenient scapegoat with the added irony that the post's occupant has no real authority to do anything except serve that purpose.
Posted by: straight_talk_11 on 05/19/07 at 12:28 PM
ARCHIVE
September 9, 2007 - September 15, 2007
September 2, 2007 - September 8, 2007
August 26, 2007 - September 1, 2007
August 19, 2007 - August 25, 2007
August 12, 2007 - August 18, 2007
August 5, 2007 - August 11, 2007
July 29, 2007 - August 4, 2007
April 22, 2007 - April 28, 2007
April 15, 2007 - April 21, 2007
April 8, 2007 - April 14, 2007
March 25, 2007 - March 31, 2007
March 18, 2007 - March 24, 2007
March 11, 2007 - March 17, 2007
March 4, 2007 - March 10, 2007
February 25, 2007 - March 3, 2007
February 18, 2007 - February 24, 2007
February 11, 2007 - February 17, 2007
February 4, 2007 - February 10, 2007
January 28, 2007 - February 3, 2007
January 21, 2007 - January 27, 2007
January 14, 2007 - January 20, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
More Bad News for Edwards, Obama (10)
MissDemeanor wrote:
I don't think John is being racist. I think John hates ev...
[more]
African Pentecostal Christians Destroying Ancient African Culture In Nigeria (18)
Muslim Watch wrote:
Mingora, 12 Sept. (AKI/DAWN) - In a grim reminder of the d...
[more]
Joe Lieberman is Now Almost Comically Hawkish (1)
Eric Ferguson wrote:
Petraeus' answer doesn't sound so much like "no" as like "...
[more]
One Special Dame: Remembering Anita Roddick (3)
Caroline Merriam wrote:
I knew Anita Roddick in Business for Social Responsibity. ...
[more]
Breaking: Sunni Tribal Leader Assassinated in Iraq (1)
Baghdad Mo wrote:
BAGHDAD, 13 (UPI) -- Al Qaida militants in Iraq have taken...
[more]
Ignite! Sparks More Controversy (3)
kirkbrew wrote:
You folks should look at this Ignite material. It is real...
[more]
Americans Fight Terrorism From the Jury Box (3)
gvc wrote:
Over the course of American history, juries made up of the...
[more]
Russia Explodes 'Father of All Bombs' (1)
Lin Geary wrote:
About comparing bomb sizes...The real Father of all Bombs ...
[more]
ABC News Investigates (Itself) (3)
LobaGirl wrote:
Unlike the university system in the US, higher education i...
[more]
NRA Offers Free Memberships to Soldiers (Step Up, Costco) (23)
Brian K wrote:
gvc,
Good point. It had stuck in my head as refering to bl...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33
Czar is pretty well synonymous with "tyrant".
(Read up on Russian royalty and you'll understand why.)
Could the government's freudian slip be showing, in it's tendency to give us Czars?
Drug Czar
Education Czar
and now War Czar
Any way, the duties were defined and the position was created over 200 years ago.
The Founding Fathers gave us a Secretary of War. George Washington named the first one (Henry Knox), and he named the position honestly: Secretary of War
So why do we now find that we need to duplicate the position? Just because it became "politically incorrect" to have a Secretary of War a few decades back, so we renamed his position to Sec. of Defense?
I think it's all BULLSH!T~!
Posted by: gvc on 05/18/07 at 1:41 PM