MOTHER JONES BY E-MAIL

«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»

The Military Is Going Nuts

A report released by a congressionally ordered mental health task force suggests that the military's handling of mental health problems in its ranks is even worse than Mother Jones previously reported (with little to no cooperation from the DoD, by the way). According to NPR, 40 percent of troops returning from Iraq or Afghanistan have some sort of psychological problem. Nearly a quarter show signs of serious mental health disorders.

It gets worse: Soldiers reporting psychological problems are not only not helped, but actually get punished for their illnesses. Some are sent to clean the latrines; others, in an image disturbingly resonant of Abu Ghraib, must sit in a corner wearing a dunce camp for long periods of time. At one army base, many soldiers were kicked out of the services following psychological complaints.

The Pentagon doesn't spend enough on mental health services, nor does it train troops, officers or even mental health care providers adequately. Believe it or not, even military doctors aren't well trained about the links between war and PTSD. For reasons NPR's correspondent doesn't address, since the War on Terror began, the few mental health specialists the DoD has "have been leaving the Army, the Marines, and the Air Force in droves." Problem is, neither the soldiers nor their demons miraculously disappear after they are released with inadequate or no treatment. The Pentagon is outsourcing their care—to you and me and the rest of us who oppose the war in Iraq.






Comments

You don't really cite any of your sources for information. Your rant isn't effective. You don't have any proof that soldiers are coming back with adverse mental disorders. It's granted that war will change these soldiers, but it isn't going to absolutly and horrificly crush their souls to the point of suicide as you make it sound.

Also, your link "neither the soldiers nor their demons miraculously disappear." has first hand reporting done by you. Your Viet-Vet dialogue could be falsified for dramatic purposes.

Quit bitching, and let the military do it's job. I've personally spoken with several military officers about their thoughts on the condition in Iraq, and all of them have stated that even 200,000 troops isn't enough to hold a presence in Iraq. A few said nothing less than 300,000, other said 500,000. Both groups agreed we need more troops. The problem in Iraq isn't the American presence, it's the lack of a stable and functioning Iraqi Government. The people of Iraq DO NOT trust their government, and do not have faith in their government. Without a standing government, the country falls into chaos (like right now).

Posted by: Kon on 06/15/07 at 6:04 PM  Respond

I don't know about "quit bitching and let the military do it's job" -- but this was a pretty superficial article. More meat, data and proof would be appreciated by anyone who reads this.

This is Mother Jones, step your game up. Just because it's a blog doesn't mean you get to be lazy like this.

Since when does a news agency have to cite its own sources?
And I would hardly call it a rant.......look at Walter Reed dumbshit.
Youre just another clueless individual with your head stuffed up Bush's dirty little ass.

Posted by: RT on 06/15/07 at 11:39 PM  Respond

The sources given in this article are "A report released by a congressionally ordered mental health task force" and "NPR."
The name of the taskforce would be nice but isn't typically given in these sorts of brief summaries. Besides, 30 seconds of searching the internet will tell you that the report was by the Defense Department Task Force on Mental Health.

I don't think that Mr. Scott needs to provide a citation for the statement that the soldiers do not disappear. Newtonian physics would suggest that they persist in their existance. And an introductory psychology course, which many readers have probably had, would provide the information to suggest that their "demons" aren't going away either. The conclusion that they end up returning, untreated and shamed, shifting the cost of their treatment to their families, is self-evident.

Posted by: ace on 06/16/07 at 4:27 AM  Respond

Touche ace

Posted by: RT on 06/16/07 at 6:08 AM  Respond

Apparently sending a letter to Walter Reed is a problem too. What a damn shame!

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/A/ARMY_BOTCHED_MAIL?SITE=CODER&SECTION=US&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2007-06-16-07-07-04;

Posted by: RT on 06/16/07 at 6:29 AM  Respond

You know I am not a person that likes to dump on the military because as a kid my father was in the military. All of his friends were military and I liked them, though we fought like hell about most everything. I never did go into the military, but a number of my friends were in the military, some of them running around in the jungles of Vietnam for six years. Still from my humble observations the only way to deal with the military is through superior rank—when Kon thinks the military will fix things I think that he's mistaken—though not entirely so. When the Iraq war was proposed the head of military command for that region of the world gave his professional judgment and said don't go to war in Iraq because it will be a complete disaster. That General was removed by “higher rank” and today the military is being run by ass kissers who will do anything they are asked to do (they think that this is their big chance)—but what was best for the nation militarily was cast aside at the outset, before war was made, and consequently all of those who were opposed to war because the truth was and still is that it wasn't in the interest of the nation to go to war in Iraq were removed, demoted or sent to Antarctica to count penguins. If the policy is, there is no such thing as Gulf Syndrome, then there is no such thing as Gulf Syndrome—if the military is given orders that there is no more than 1 in 5 or 1 in 10 with PTSD then those will be the statistics and some of those who have it will be told they do not have it—because it has been ordered from above. Thus if there is torture and it is ordered from above then it was ordered from below—to the lowest rank that won't effect the chain of command—interestingly in Iraq this is seen to stop below an officer—that says a lot about where the military is at, .. Kon why do you think that McCain and Kerry bothered to aid Veterans and why it required their initiative to convince congress to intervene on behalf of these Veterans so that they were finally respected. Vietnam was a war started by liars, run by liars and afterwards liars wanted to screw over the whole gang of kids who lacked the brain power to say F—you to Uncle Sam and burn their draft card or were gullible enough to believe they were going off to fight for the survival of the nation against “evil”. These vets have on average had their entire lives screwed up by that meaningless war. How does a person live with the fact that they can't get through the day without medication (because they have PTSD), that they wake up in the middle of ever night 35 years after they left the jungles of war and find their bed soaked through with sweat, while they scream at the top of lungs, that half the people they knew over there have committed suicide or are in prison or so lost in alcohol they don't even know what year it is (these people probably suffer from PTSD too)—because war does not end when the soldier returns, its there for the rest of their lives and it only ends when they die, that is one of the reasons why war is basically wrong and it only justifiable when it is the only way out—like WWII, where the choice was fight or perish. It is then you fight otherwise it is necessary to use diplomacy and try to seek out higher ideals. With Bush the higher ideal has been sacrificed for lies—whether it is Guantanamo, the entire concept of Civil Rights, of Habeas Corpus, I mean the man has taken us to a pre Magna Carta (from 1215) form of justice and tragically the military is an arm of this sickness. Ultimately it will require intervention by both political parties through Congress and hopefully by means of the next president to right the wrongs president Bush has done to not just the military but also every other aspect of our society. The unitary executive theory has not only been proven ill advised, it appears highly likely that a major consequence of “Bushism” will mean that the bid to retain American hegemony via hard power has failed, because Iraq is lost and we know that the next line of lies will soon be served up, that we need surge two and surge three and then I think Bush will be hit with an ultimatum—either he orders the withdrawal of all troops or he will be impeached. The balance of power in the Middle East has been altered—Iraq was a lynch pin holding things in check and now that pin is gone, removed by a geopolitical dunce who didn't listen to the advice of his military command nor his diplomatic corp because little George, Uncle Dickey, Rummy, Wolfie and all the other idiots knew best. That's what happens when “ideologues” take power, they destroy the balance of power because they don't know what it is—even at this moment Bush is busy trying to prove that the entire reason we are failing in Iraq is because of Iran. But Iran did not invade Afghanistan! Iran did not invade Iraq! Iran did not invade Lebanon!

Posted by: Kirilovslogic on 06/17/07 at 12:04 AM  Respond

Kon you state that "The problem in Iraq isn't the American presence, it's the lack of a stable and functioning Iraqi Government. The people of Iraq DO NOT trust their government, and do not have faith in their government. Without a standing government, the country falls into chaos (like right now)."

But surely you *must* realize that the American presence is the very reason that they do *not* have a stable and functioning government. It is the American (OK 'coalition' if you prefer) troops that removed the functioning government that they had, and has attempted to impose a government to the liking of their masters in DC.

You also seem to deny that the troops could be suffering from mental disorders, even though you assert that "that even 200,000 troops isn't enough to hold a presence in Iraq. A few said nothing less than 300,000, other said 500,000." So we should believe that the troops pushed into a situation that requires 2 - 3 times the number of troops (and being pushed back into that cauldron over and over) is not likely to suffer serious mental problems, or to even lead to suicide. With multiple deployments, short-handed by a factor of 2 or 3, expecting to be blown up at any moment; I can easily see where suicide could seem to be the only way to break the vicious cycle. I've been in some bad situations in my life where I thought that death was the only way to end the misery, but I have *never* been in any situation that remotely resembled the fix these troops are in. Especially being forced to return over and over again has *got* to take a toll.

Posted by: DaveD on 06/18/07 at 4:12 AM  Respond

the "military" outsources just about everything to us; they are mostly in the war business, not peace and justice .

Posted by: deritpeehs on 06/18/07 at 11:21 AM  Respond

Here's a thought. Maybe the military knows how dangerous "mental health treatment" in it's current form really is and doesn't want thousands of it's soldiers turning into the Virginia Tech shooter while being "treated".

Think that's an absurd statement? Well here is just a summary of the Int'l warnings on Psyche drugs since just 2004:

2004

February 2: FDA official Dr. Andrew D. Mosholder testified before the FDA’s Psychopharmacological Advisory Committee on the Office of Drug Safety Data Resources for the Study of Suicidal Events, warning that children being prescribed the newer antidepressants were at risk of suicide.

March 22: The FDA warned that Prozac-like antidepressants (called Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors or SSRIs) could cause "anxiety, agitation, panic attacks, insomnia, irritability, hostility, impulsivity, akathisia [severe restlessness], hypomania [abnormal excitement] and mania [psychosis characterized by exalted feelings, delusions of grandeur]."

June: The Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration published an Adverse Drug Reactions Bulletin reporting that the latest antipsychotics could increase the risk of diabetes.

June: The FDA ordered that the packaging for the stimulant Adderall include a warning about sudden cardiovascular deaths, especially in children with underlying heart disease.

August 20: A Columbia University review of the pediatric (child) clinical trials of Zoloft, Celexa, Effexor, Wellbutrin, Paxil and Prozac, found that young people who took them could experience suicidal thoughts or actions.

September 21: Following a BBC news report on antidepressants causing aggression and homicidal behavior, the British Healthcare Products Regulatory Authority advised that it had issued guidelines that children should not be given most SSRIs because clinical trial data showed an increased rate of harmful outcomes, including hostility.

October 15: The FDA ordered a "black box" warning for antidepressants that they could cause suicidal thoughts and actions in under 18 year olds taking them.

October 21: The New Zealand Medicines Adverse Reactions Committee recommended that old and new antidepressants not be administered to patients less than 18 years of age because of the potential risk of suicide.

December: The Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration children and adolescents prescribed SSRI antidepressants should be carefully monitored for the emergence of suicidal ideation. In a recent study involving Prozac, it said, there was an increase in adverse psychiatric events (acts and ideation [thoughts] of suicide, self-harm, aggression, violence.)

December 9: The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use confirmed that product information should be changed for antidepressants to warn of the risk of suicide-related behavior in children and adolescents and of withdrawal reactions on stopping treatment.

December 17: The FDA required that packaging for the "ADHD" drug Straterra carry a new warning advising, "Severe liver damage may progress to liver failure resulting in death or the need for a liver transplant in a small percentage of patients."

2005

February 9: Health Canada, the Canadian counterpart of the FDA, suspended marketing of Adderall XR (Extended Release, given once a day) due to reports of 20 sudden unexplained deaths (14 in children) and 12 strokes (2 in children) in patients taking Adderall or Adderall XR.

February 18: A study published in the British Medical Journal determined that adults taking SSRI antidepressants were more than twice as likely to attempt suicide as patients given placebo.

April: The British House of Commons (Parliament) Health Committee issued a damning report that SSRI antidepressants had been "indiscriminately prescribed on a grand scale" and that drug companies have marketed the drugs without punishment to treat "unhappiness [that] is part of the spectrum of human experience, not a medical condition."

April 11: The FDA warned that antipsychotic drugs in elderly patients could increase the risk of death.

April 21: A national non-government organization, Partnership for a Drug-Free America, released its findings of a study that determined that 10% of teens (2.3 million) had abused the stimulants Ritalin and Adderall.

April 25: The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use reaffirmed that all the latest antidepressants could cause increased suicide-related behavior and hostility in young people.

June 28: The FDA announced its intention to make labeling changes to Concerta and other Ritalin products to include the side effects: "visual hallucinations, suicidal ideation [ideas], psychotic behavior, as well as aggression or violent behavior."

June 30: The FDA warned that the latest antidepressant Cymbalta could increase suicidal thinking or behavior in pediatric patients taking it.

June 30: The FDA also warned about a potential increased risk of suicidal behavior in adults taking antidepressants, broadening its earlier warning that related only to children and adolescents taking the drugs.

July 1: An FDA "Talk Paper" said that it had requested antidepressant manufacturers to provide all information from their clinical trials on possible increased suicidal behavior in adults taking the drugs.

July 7: The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University issued a report called "Under the Counter: The Diversion and Abuse of Controlled Prescription Drugs in the U.S." that determined 15 million Americans were getting high on painkillers and psychiatric drugs such as the tranquilizer Xanax and the stimulants Ritalin and Adderall. Between 1992 and 2003, the number of 12 to 17 year olds abusing these drugs had risen 212%. Teens who abused prescription drugs were 12 times likelier to use heroin, 15 times likelier to use Ecstasy and 21 times likelier to use cocaine, compared to teens that did not abuse such drugs.

July 16: The British Medical Journal published a study, "Efficacy of antidepressants in adults," by Joanna Moncrieff, senior lecturer in psychiatry at University College London who found that antidepressants were no more effective than a placebo (fake pill) and do not reduce depression. In a media interview on the study, Dr. Moncrieff stated, "The bottom line is that we really don’t have any good evidence that these drugs work."

August: The Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration found a relationship between antidepressants and suicidality, akathisia (severe restlessness), agitation, nervousness and anxiety in adults. Similar symptoms could occur during withdrawal from the drugs, it determined.

August 19: The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use issued its strongest warning against child antidepressant use, stating that the drugs caused suicide attempts and thoughts, aggression, hostility, aggression, oppositional behavior and anger.

August 22: Norwegian researchers found that patients taking antidepressants were seven times more likely to experience suicide than those taking placebo.

September 7: The Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration warned that antidepressant use during pregnancy could cause "withdrawal effects that can be severe or life-threatening."

September 13: The Oregon Health & Science University, Evidence-Based Practice Center published the findings of its review of 2,287 studies—virtually every study ever conducted on "ADHD" drugs—and found that there were no trials showing the effectiveness of these drugs and that there was a lack of evidence that they could affect "academic performance, risky behaviors, social achievements, etc." Further, "We found no evidence on long-term safety of drugs used to treat ADHD in young children" or "adolescents."

September 22: Dr. Jeffrey Lieberman of Columbia University and other researchers published a federally funded study in the New England Journal of Medicine about the effectiveness of certain antipsychotic drugs, comparing an older generation of antipsychotics with several newer ones. Far from proving effectiveness, of the 1,493 patients who had participated, 74% discontinued their antipsychotic drugs before the end of their treatment due to inefficacy, intolerable side effects or other reasons. After 18 months of taking Zyprexa, 64% of the patients taking this stopped, most commonly because it caused sleepiness, weight gain or neurological symptoms like stiffness and tremors.

September 26: The Italian Gazette (official news agency of the Italian government) published a resolution of the Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco (Italian Drug Agency, equivalent to the FDA) ordering a warning label for older (tricyclic) antidepressants that the drugs should not be prescribed for under 18 year olds. They also determined that they were associated with heart attacks in people of any age.

September 27: The FDA warned that Paxil and other antidepressants taken during the first trimester of pregnancy could cause increased risk of major birth defects, including heart malformations in newborn infants.

September 28: The British National Health Service’s Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence released a Clinical Guideline for treatment of "Depression in Children and Young People." It advised "all antidepressant drugs have significant risks when given to children and young people" and instead, they should be "offered advice on the benefits of regular exercise," "sleep hygiene," "nutrition and the benefits of a balanced diet."

September 29: The FDA directed Eli Lilly & Co. to revise Strattera labeling to include a boxed warning about the increased risk of suicidal thinking in children and adolescents taking it.

September 29: The UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency issued a press release that it had begun a review of the risks of Strattera in light of the FDA’s direction.

October: The sales and marketing of the stimulant Cylert were stopped in the U.S. because of the risk of liver damage that could lead to death.

October 17: The FDA ordered Eli Lilly & Co. to add a warning to the packaging of its antidepressant Cymbalta, that it could cause liver damage.

October 19: A study in the Journal of the American Medical Association concluded that atypical (newer) antipsychotic drugs could increase the risk of death in elderly people.

October 24: The FDA withdrew Cylert from the market because of its "overall risk of liver toxicity" and liver failure.

November: The FDA approved updated labeling for the antidepressant Effexor XR which noted that this antidepressant can cause homicidal ideation.

December 1: Researchers found that 18% of nearly 23,000 elderly patients taking the older antipsychotics died within the first six months of taking them.

December 8: The FDA warned that Paxil taken by pregnant women in their first trimester may cause birth defects, including heart malformations.

2006

January 5: The FDA said it had received reports of sudden deaths, strokes, heart attacks and hypertension (high blood pressure) in both children and adults taking "ADHD" drugs and asked its Drug Safety and Risk Management advisory committee to examine the potential of cardiovascular (heart) risks of the drugs.

February 4: A University of Texas study published in Pediatric Neurology reported cardiovascular problems in people taking stimulants.

February 5: An analysis of World Health Organization medical records found that infants whose mothers took antidepressants while pregnant could suffer withdrawal effects.

February 6: A study published in the Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine determined that nearly one-third of newborn infants whose mothers took SSRI antidepressants during pregnancy experienced withdrawal symptoms that included high-pitched crying, tremors and disturbed sleep.

February 9: The FDA’s Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee urged that the strongest "black box" warning be issued for stimulants, including Ritalin, Adderall and Concerta and that they may cause heart attacks, strokes and sudden death.

February 11: The Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration announced it would review the FDA advisory committee recommendation for stronger warnings against stimulants.

February 20: British authorities warned that the "ADHD" drug Strattera was associated with seizures and potentially lengthening period of the time between heartbeats.

February 25: A study in the journal, Drug and Alcohol Dependence, and reported in The Washington Post revealed that seven million Americans were estimated to have abused stimulant drugs and a substantial amount of teenagers and young adults now appeared to show signs of addiction.

March 10: Health Canada issued a warning that pregnant women taking SSRIs and other newer antidepressants placed newborns at risk of developing a rare lung and heart condition.

March 22-23: Two FDA advisory panels held hearings into the risk of stimulants and another new "ADHD" drug called Sparlon. Between January 2000 and June 30, 2005, the FDA had received almost 1,000 reports of kids experiencing psychosis or mania while taking the drugs. The first panel recommended stronger warnings against stimulants, emphasizing these on special handouts called "Med Guides" that doctors must give to patients with each prescription. The second committee recommended not to approve Sparlon, which the manufacturer, Cephalon, estimated would lose them $100 million in drug sales.

March 28: The Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration announced its review of reports of 400 adverse reactions to stimulants in children taking them. CCHR had filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the TGA to obtain the reports and released this to the media that ran the story internationally.

May 1: An American Journal of Psychiatry study revealed that elderly people prescribed antidepressants such as Prozac, Paxil, and Zoloft are almost five times more likely to commit suicide during the first month on the drugs than those given other classes of antidepressants.

May 3: FDA adverse drug reaction reports linked 45 child deaths to new antipsychotic drugs. There were also more than 1,300 reports of other potentially life-threatening adverse reactions such as convulsions and low white blood cell count.

May 12: GlaxoSmithKline, the manufacturer of Paxil, sent a letter to doctors warning that its antidepressant increases the risk of suicide in adults. It was the first warning of its kind by a manufacturer.

July 19: The FDA said antidepressant packaging should carry warnings that they may cause a fatal lung condition in newborns whose mothers took SSRI antidepressants during pregnancy. Migraine sufferers also need to be warned that combining migraine drugs with SSRIs could result in a life-threatening condition called serotonin syndrome.

August: In August, the Archives of General Psychiatry published a study by Mark Olfson, MD, MPH; Steven C. Marcus, PhD; David Shaffer, MD, on “Antidepressant Drug Therapy and Suicide in Severely Depressed Children and Adults.” The study determined that children taking antidepressants were 1.52 times more likely to attempt suicide and 15 times ore likely to succeed in the attempt than those not taking the drugs.

September: A study came out in the Public Library of Science Medicine journal. The study was done by psychiatrist David Healy and his team of researchers. The study found that the psychiatric drug Paxil raises the risk of severe violence in a small percentage of people. The researchers looked at clinical trial data from the manufacturer of the drug, GlaxoSmithKline, and found a higher rate of hostile behavior (0.38 percent to 0.66 percent) in patients taking Paxil than in patients taking other antidepressants.

October: A study was published in Behavioral Neuroscience entitled “Differential Responsiveness to Fluoxetine During Puberty,” which involved injecting "adolescent" and adult hamsters with varying doses of fluoxetine (Prozac), found that even on low doses, 40% more likely to become aggressive than those on placebo.

October: The journal Pharmacotherapy published a study entitled “Illicit Use of Specific Prescription Stimulants Among College Students: Prevalence, Motives, and Routes of Administration,” about illicit use of stimulants among college students. Researchers at Northeastern University, led by Northeastern University Pharmacy Professor Christian Teter, found that 8.3% of students had abused prescription stimulants sometime during their life and 5.9% within the last year. Nearly 40% of the students that abused stimulants reported they snorted prescription stimulants. About ¾ of the students who abused stimulants in the last year had abused Adderall while the rest had abused Ritalin or drugs in the same class as Ritalin. In the press release that ran in Newswise (news release website), Professor Teter stated that one “possibility for the overwhelming prevalence of illicit Adderall use may be the fact that it is the most commonly prescribed brand-name stimulant in the U.S.” Stories on this article ran in several news sources, including a United Press International wire.

October 12: The New England Journal of Medicine published study, “Effectiveness of Atypical Antipsychotic Drugs in Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease,” found that antipsychotic drugs used to control “agitation and aggression in people with Alzheimer’s disease are no more effective than placebos for most patients, and put them at risk of serious side effects, including confusion, sleepiness and Parkinson’s like symptoms.”

October 18: The Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (equivalent to the FDA) ordered manufacturers of “ADHD” drugs, Ritalin, Strattera and dexamphetamine to add stronger warnings to their information packaging, because of complaints that Ritalin caused headache, nausea, anorexia, somnolence and depression; Strattera caused aggression, and dexamphetamine caused agitation, tachycardia (rapid heartbeat), hypertonia (abnormally tight muscles), hyperkinesia (muscle spasm) and insomnia.

October 23: Dr. Peter Schlegel presented a study at the American Society for Reproductive Medicine conference in New Orleans that determined that while two men were taking antidepressants, their sperm counts dropped dramatically to almost zero, but recovered to healthy levels whenever their drugs were suspended.

October 25: The FDA and Wyeth, the manufacturer of the antidepressant Effexor, announced that doctors should limit the number of Effexor pills they prescribe patients to reduce the risk of overdose. Overdosing on any antidepressant can be fatal but there may be a greater risk of deadly overdose associated with Effexor than with other SSRI antidepressant.

November: The British Journal of Psychiatry published a new analysis of new antidepressant trials lasting 8 to 12 weeks involving children and adolescents suffering severe depression. Researchers found that 5% of children taking new-generation antidepressants were involved in self-harm or suicidal events, compared with 3% cent of those taking placebo. Dr. Bernadka Dubicka of the University Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Royal Manchester Children’s Hospital, and others conducted the study.

November: The journal Epidemiology, published a study entitled “Maternal Use of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Risk of Congenital [defects from birth] Malformations.” Researchers from Aarhus University in Denmark found that pregnant women who take the newer type of antidepressants, such as Prozac, are more likely to have babies with birth defects than mothers who don’t take these drugs.

November 6: The UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, announced that it was updating the product information for methylphenidate (Ritalin to “advise about serious cardiovascular adverse effects” and to recommend that methylphenidate not be used in children or adolescents with known serious structural cardiac abnormalities.

November 27: The FDA has issued a public health advisory which warns that people receiving treatment with methadone have died and suffered life threatening side effects because of overdoses, including slow or shallow breathing and dangerous changes in heart beat that may not be felt by the patient.

November 30: The obstetric (Obstetrics is the branch of medicine which deals with pregnancy and child birth) practice committee of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (Gynecologists are doctors that specialize in the female reproductive system and disorders that can occur with it) issued a statement that pregnant women and those who plan to become pregnant should avoid taking the antidepressant Paxil if possible because of the risk of birth defects.

December 13: The FDA held a hearing into the relationship between antidepressants and suicide in those 18-25 years of age (“young adults”). The FDA Psychopharmacological Committee heard testimony from about 75 people who slammed the FDA for having the information 15 years ago about suicide/violence risks and failed to act. The committee voted to extend the black box warning to ages 18 to 25.

Posted by: Apache on 06/18/07 at 12:19 PM  Respond

Gawd......thats depressing.

Posted by: RT on 06/18/07 at 7:01 PM  Respond

The military is being overwhelmed with PTSD issues at the moment. The most serious cases are not being properly treated, and less severe cases are often soft-pedaled with pills or, in the case of junior soldiers, punished with non-judicial means or medical chapters. Frankly I don't think the American public has a clear picture of how bad it is getting, and lot of this problems are going to last for several years into the future. The reprecussions worry me.

And in case anyone up there wants to question how I know this, I am an Army officer, I returned from my latest deployment with a mild form of PTSD, and I have seen some junior soldiers pushed out of the Army for outbursts of bad behavior that occured after they returned from combat. I personally had to grab a couple of these junior soldiers and ensure that they saw a shrink, because their chain of command was shoving them out the door without even attempting to find out if they came home with a mental condition.

So don't lecture me about "letting the military do it's job." Our job includes taking care of soldiers, and in that we are failing.

Posted by: Christian on 06/20/07 at 1:40 AM  Respond

CHRISTIAN HEALING MINISTRIES HAS THE COMPLETE ANSWER. THIS IS THE ONLY SUCCESSFUL THERAPY FOR ANY MAJOR MENTAL PROBLEM. IT HAS BEEN PROVEN FOR ALL TYPES OF DEPRESSION, PTSD ETC.. IT IS PAST TIME TO GET IT RIGHT---PEOPLE--

CHRISTIAN HEALING MINISTRIES, THERE ARE THOUSANDS OF TRUE HEALINGS OF SEVERE DEPRESSION ETC..

WE NEVER LEARNED A THING FROM VIET NAM FOR TREATING SOLDIERDS DEPRESSION ETC.., TYPICAL GOVERNMENT action !!


THANK YOU !! RICH

Posted by: RICHIE AANDERUD on 06/29/07 at 8:52 PM  Respond

IF YOU WANT A REAL HEALING FROM PTSD ,,DEPRESSION ETC. E-MAIL ME AND I WILL HELP YOU FIND THE REAL ANSWER. OR STAY WITH THE GOV. MENTAL HEALTH AND CONTINUE TO SUFFER. TRY SOMETHING THAT HAS BEEN AROUND SINCE 1963 AND HAS BEEN EXTREMELY SUCCESSFUL .

raanderud@msn.com Take care.

rich

Posted by: RICHIE AANDERUD on 06/29/07 at 9:04 PM  Respond

Post a comment





 

RECENT COMMENTS

Intelligence Briefing on the Hill Today (19)
oyun wrote: Teşekkürler ..... [more]

Some Surprising New Findings on GIs, PTSD, and Crime (1)
smitisan wrote: When I was in basic back in 71, we had a lot of guys claim... [more]

High Gas Prices Save Lives (5)
CitizenWhale wrote: No one drives at 55mph, and it is a known fact that there ... [more]

Preteens on the Pill? (11)
Scott james wrote: My Sister Samantha turns 10 years old next week and She wi... [more]

Interesting Fact About Wisconsin Election Results (3)
antra jolly wrote: This article includes all the details related to the Wisco... [more]

About That "Dems Must Win West Virginia" Argument... (5)
Nelson wrote: This is miraculous news that people forget that Bill Clint... [more]

Why Talula Does the Hula No More (1)
rob wrote: you forgot to mention children called midnight chardonnay,... [more]

Obama in Berlin: Another Great Communicator? (9)
Jeff Hardy wrote: It is about time we had few one like this representation A... [more]

No Good Veep Choices for McCain? (5)
dorkey wrote: The vice presidential buzz is mounting, and many think a p... [more]

Iraq Contract Fraud: Senators Call For Arrests, Recovery of Funds (14)
Oyun wrote: Stuff like this has been going on and on for years and yea... [more]

XML RSS Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.33

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com


















bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN


This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2008 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS