«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
Democrats' Plans for Universal Health Care Helps Red States Most
Let's say a Democrat wins the 2008 election and institutes universal health care. Who benefits the most? Republicans.
That's right -- a new study shows that the red states (mostly in the South) consistently rate at the bottom of the country in terms of health care for residents. The Commonwealth Fund report ranked states according to 32 indicators of health care access, quality, outcomes, and hospital use. Consider the political leanings of the top ten and the bottom ten.
States 1-10: Hawaii, Iowa, New Hampshire, Vermont, Maine, Rhode Island, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Wisconsin, South Dakota.
States 50-41: Oklahoma, Mississippi, Texas, Arkansas, Nevada, Louisiana, Kentucky, West Virginia, Florida, Georgia.
This shouldn't be a surprise. States led by Republicans are more likely to have laissez faire attitudes towards health care and be less sympathetic to the plights of those who cannot afford it. It doesn't help that these states are often the most hostile towards workers' rights, thus driving down wages, and often have the highest number of single mothers, due to the nation's highest rates of divorce and out-of-wedlock births. Get all the details and schadenfreude at PERRspectives Blog.
Comments
I don't think I can enjoy schadenfreude over someone's lack of health care. Perhaps the lack of good health has also contributed to the lack of brainpower that allows them to vote against their own self-interest. Oh wait. Sorry, that was bad. I shouldn't imply that republicans are in any way mentally deficient. They're not. But, they do need to recognize that their party is not what it once was. They need to realize that it's time to leave the party that has long since left them.
Republicans in the populous generally want smaller government. Republicans in office have long since left that ruse behind. They can talk about the tax and spend liberals all they want. But, tax and spend is more fiscally responsible than borrow and spend. At least it philosophically recognizes that the bills must be paid.
What the socialist can’t comprehend is that the red-state white-trash peasants will resent the Democrats even more. White-trash instinctively know that anything that helps them ALSO helps “those people”. And, they also know they’d rather cut-off-their proverbial noses than do THAT.
Posted by: John on 06/21/07 at 11:59 AM Respond
I have medicare, but no dental at all, so rotting teeth make my immune system more aggresivly attack my kidneys. So medicare gladly pays 120,000 extra for hospital and medicines, but foolishly saves 4,000 dollars by denying me dental care.
This is America, I love capitalism, but Medicine is a human right, obove capitalism. If a DR wants to get fillthy rich, he is in wrong business, he should become a plumber or buthcher. DR's hate Universal Health Care, so the HMO's who they love now hurth them. I say just rewards!
Posted by: Kris Debal on 06/21/07 at 7:55 PM Respond
I have medicare, but I don't have dental or vision care. I retired with may years in Federal service, I had vision & dental care, all of a sudden I'm back to square one. BC/BS like many other healthcare companies care less about its members. So universal healthcare is a must for seniors.
Posted by: Peggy on 06/22/07 at 2:08 AM Respond
Kris Debal on 6/21/07 wrote that Dr's are against a national health care system. I believe the AMA is in favor of a national system, and I have read letters to editors or opinion columns by many physicians who support one. I don't know where Kris gets his information.
Posted by: Geecor on 06/22/07 at 12:25 PM Respond
I'm a red-state resident who fully expects a national health care system to be in place within the next 10 years.
But I expect it to operate more like Medicaid than Medicare.
If there's a billing code for it, you can get it paid for under Medicare - not so with Medicaid.
And expect rationing, especially at the top of the demographic pile.
Medicare paid for my grandfather's open heart surgery around age 80.
That would never happen under a universal health care system.
(he'd be shunted to Hospice care)
On the other hand, people with basic, chronic conditions (e.g. diabetes) will get more consistent care, that will cost them personally much less than they pay now.
Whether you feel that is a good or bad outcome, it is what will happen under the forthcoming "National Health, USA"
Posted by: Bill on 06/23/07 at 12:48 PM Respond
why doesn't some think tank dedicate their energies to parading the political ,cultural ,financial disconnects between the red -states and the blue states---it started in early colonization and there has been "bad - blood "ever since--the south has been on the opposite side of the fence on every issue--revolutionary war--civil rights --cultural authoritarianism and militarism- they have ROTC in high schools!!!
the north and south do not FIT well on many issues --if only to create strife and political tension---
a top northern tier of states would be so much better served if it could join or affiliate with Canada---why not make that type of union possible---???--short of splitting the union---which is far from a functional union---
Posted by: LOREN J CLOSE II on 06/25/07 at 2:03 AM Respond
LOREN J CLOSE II,
Why not just go with the split as the states voted themselves on the particularly divisive issue of W? The blue states can all simply merge with Canada. All are contiguous either with Canada or with other blue states. See map for resulting nations.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesusland_map
Personally, I liked the map variant wikipedia called "the most extreme case".
Posted by: Misanthropic Scott on 06/25/07 at 10:06 AM Respond
ARCHIVE
August 10, 2008 - August 16, 2008
August 3, 2008 - August 9, 2008
July 27, 2008 - August 2, 2008
April 20, 2008 - April 26, 2008
April 13, 2008 - April 19, 2008
April 6, 2008 - April 12, 2008
March 30, 2008 - April 5, 2008
March 23, 2008 - March 29, 2008
March 16, 2008 - March 22, 2008
March 9, 2008 - March 15, 2008
February 24, 2008 - March 1, 2008
February 17, 2008 - February 23, 2008
February 10, 2008 - February 16, 2008
February 3, 2008 - February 9, 2008
January 27, 2008 - February 2, 2008
January 20, 2008 - January 26, 2008
January 13, 2008 - January 19, 2008
January 6, 2008 - January 12, 2008
December 30, 2007 - January 5, 2008
December 23, 2007 - December 29, 2007
December 16, 2007 - December 22, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
John McCain Has More Odd Things to Say About Russia/Georgia (1)
Franklin Grimes wrote:
What I like about the Republicans is how they got war's st...
[more]
Partition in Iraq: A Serious Problem With Biden as VP? (28)
Carolyn wrote:
I'm going to have to agree with Danny, 'massimo.' Jest cuz...
[more]
McCain's Bizarre Undiscovered Foreign Policy Ideas (12)
Drunk Philosopher wrote:
To Jim, quote: "The "insightful" Zakaria calls Iran and No...
[more]
The Campaign Goes Christian (3)
Sharon wrote:
Vote for Ralph Nader for real change. Obama is a hypocrite...
[more]
The Rooskies Are Out to Get Us! (6)
Emphyrio wrote:
5. They think it's the state of Georgia where the Atlanta ...
[more]
Troops Abroad Give to Obama 6:1 (2)
Jeugenen wrote:
LIBERAL OBAMA OR NEO-CON/NEO-LIB MC-CAIN
The political st...
[more]
Speedo's $600 Swimsuits: Made in America, Bought by China (45)
Brandon wrote:
Tech has not gone too far. This is simply another geegaw ...
[more]
Why is HHS Secretary Mike Leavitt Blogging About Abortion? (1)
PeaceNick wrote:
I think what Secretary Leavitt and the Bush administration...
[more]
Under for Fire for Pastor's Remarks, Obama To Give Major Speech on Race (11)
Acomplia wrote:
Generic Acomplia is an Anti Obesity Drug that is Best Weig...
[more]
Responding to MoJo, Huckabee Campaign Explains Difference Between Homosexuality and Necrophilia (19)
dış cephe wrote:
teşekürler....
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


Posted by: Misanthropic Scott on 06/21/07 at 11:19 AM Respond