MOTHER JONES BY E-MAIL
May 13, 2008

«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»

Title IX--35 Years Old And Still Misunderstood

Title IX is 35 years old today. The brainchild of former Congresswoman Patsy Mink, Title IX establishes equal opportunity for girls in all schools that receive federal funding. Unfortunately, the term "Title IX" is now associated with equal athletic opportunity, but the law covers much more than that.

Also unfortunately, many people who write and argue about Title IX, including many journalists who should know better, are clueless about how the law works.

The ACLU website, in recognition of the 35th anniversary, has an entire section devoted to Title IX. Here, you can learn about what the law means, look at actual Title IX case summaries, and find out what you can do to help promote the ideals of Title IX.






Comments

Title 9 is great, now women make up 60% of the college enrollment, and men only 40%. I guess some of the women will have to marry a redneck like me or an old man or each other. Title 9 is a great success. Without Title 9 I would not have an opportunity to marry a college women. I personally think that Title 9 is great.

Posted by: Goober on 06/23/07 at 3:37 PM  Respond

Agreed! Title IX is a great law. It has changed the landscape of colleges!

Goober and PoliticalCritic, you are still unclear about the intent of Title IX. Your comments are ignorant. Enjoy your time kicking back and living off the women you meet. Women still make .75 to every $1.00 a man makes. As the cost of living increases, you'll need to be looking for work soon enough. Too bad all you'll be qualified for is a minimum wage job!
:
:
Title IX regulations not only extend to colleges, but to public K-12 schools that accept federal funds as well. Gender bias (or gender inequity) towards students still exists at the K-12 level. This is apparent by who gets referred for learning disabilities, and who doesn't, and the reasons for such referrals.

Socially constructed norms of behavior for boys and girls are reinforced by teachers when loud and disruptive (over-active) boys are given more attention in class than quiet girls. Girls are doing what they are told, yet are often most often ignored by their teachers. When some invisible line is crossed in the teacher's ability to cope with the disruption, boys are often finally referred out of class to be assessed for learning disabilities.

What's wrong with this picture? Many things come to mind. Importantly, girls are being ignored in classrooms, and the socially constructed norm of "girls are expected to be nice, quiet, and to sit still," is being reinforced to girls' detriment. Boys are behaving in a socially acceptable manner (for boys), and are initially positively reinforced for it, but end up being punished by the referral. Some boys may have attention-hyperactivity issues, but not all who are referred actually do. Girls who are left in class and ignored may indeed have attention-deficit problems that do require assessment.

Educators need to learn appropriate guidelines for learning disability referral. More importantly, educators must become aware of gender bias within themselves, and learn how to change it so that children are not adversely affected in learning environments.

We can't know who actually has learning disabilities if we continue to ignore half the school population. That's putting it simply.

Posted by: irishgawdess on 06/25/07 at 4:14 PM  Respond

Bottom line, after all is said and done, 60% of college students are female. Males are in the minority due to latent discrimination. The females will have to marry goobers like me. This is great.

Posted by: Goober on 06/25/07 at 7:56 PM  Respond

Has anyone ever figgered out that one of the reasons for declining wages is that women are entering far more fields mostly occupied by men? If those in charge determine values for work and they don't value women then it stands to reason that where women excel the earnings will go down.

Employers pay the lowest wage possible(regardless of gender, race, and creed). They will hire a Mexican over a white female. If the Mexican is too expensive, then the job goes to China. Stop your complaining, or the job will go to China or India. They can do the job that you can do for 10% of the cost. There is no EEOC and regulation overseas. If that is not the solution, then with the H-1a visa, we can bring them over here and work for cheap. Just get use to it, the USA will soon be a third world country due to globalism.

Posted by: The MAN on 06/26/07 at 7:21 AM  Respond

Thanks for sharing this.What Title--IX means exactly should be something that every red-blooded American woman(or the daughter of)fully knows, understands and actively pursues the enforcement of,when it comes to the future of our country.

Posted by: LaceyMildMax on 06/27/07 at 4:44 PM  Respond

The Supreme Court today, 5 to 4 did away with affirmative action in the schools. Title IX is next on the list of deconstructing American society.

Posted by: James on 06/28/07 at 7:37 AM  Respond

Such hostility from 'irishgawdess' in comment #3.

I didn't know all I was qualified for was a minimum wage job and I kick back and live off the women I meet.

irishgawdess: "Enjoy your time kicking back and living off the women you meet. Women still make .75 to every $1.00 a man makes" If I made more money than women, I would work, and they would live off me. But since them college educated women make more, I get to stay at home. By the way "Irish goddess" sounds arrogant and racist.

Posted by: Goober on 10/23/07 at 2:18 PM  Respond

Post a comment





 

RECENT COMMENTS

The John Edwards Endorsement: A Last Chance To Prove He's No Phony (3)
jes wrote: Another hack job against the Clintons. Maybe you people i... [more]

Can Clinton Wait Until Texas and Ohio? (45)
Lawyerfan wrote: I'm not sure Juliani's loss in Florida was the result of s... [more]

GOP: McCain is Chilling, But We'll Vote For Him (6)
Alternate Reality Check wrote: ["They all stated that McCain received preferential treatm... [more]

On Delegates and Democracy (2)
Patrick wrote: "Notice that this is an inversion of the fight over Florid... [more]

Huckabee Goes Nuclear on WA State GOP (11)
MSO wrote: You know what? I'm in agreement with the Huckabee Camp. T... [more]

The Bushies Coalesce Around McCain (7)
MSO wrote: This is so phony; Pres. Bush, Jeb Bush and Karl Rove endor... [more]

In Endorsing Obama, Kennedy Anoints a Prince and Tells Clintons To Cool It (56)
Chrissy wrote: Can anyone tell me where BO's latest $32 million contribut... [more]

Wait, What? Fred Thompson Endorsed McCain? (1)
MSO wrote: The Repubs. are desperate to nominate McCann as the Rep. P... [more]

Video: Using John McCain's Iraq Rhetoric Against Him (2)
Paul Miller wrote: I thought it was good, but not edited as effectively as it... [more]

Here's Your Damn Baby, Now Where Are My #@%&ing Diamond Earrings? (15)
Shannon wrote: PushPresents are a way of commemorating a new addition to ... [more]

XML RSS Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.33

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com

















bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN


This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2008 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS