«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
National Monument Saved From 4x4 Enthusiasts
A federal judge recently ruled that Utah's Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument may not be used as an ATV playground, putting an end to nine years of heated disputes between off-road vehicle activists and equally dedicated conservationists. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance and Earthjustice acted as defendants in the case and Kane and Garfield counties, within which the monument lies, were plaintiffs.
The 1.9 million-acre monument, established as such in 1996 by President Clinton under the Antiquities Act, became the second largest monument in the continental United States and and is habitat for countless endangered species.
The Grand Staircase is one of many monuments, for which counties supportive of off-roading have invoked a 1866 mining statute called RS 2477 (a law that allows road construction over public lands), to counteract usage restrictions that monument status brings. Effectively, if the county can prove a road had been established before 1976, they have a shot at re-opening it to the public and, of course, for off-roading. In that spirit, horse trails, boulder-strewn washes, dried up creeks, and even hiking paths became possible ATV highways, sometimes even private property as we reported in our most recent issue.
The recent federal ruling puts ownership of these public lands firmly in federal hands, which hopefully means fewer 18" tires will be traversing (and destroying) the monument's unique ecosystem. But most likely, the ruling will also increase the ire of 4x4 activists dedicated to driving public lands, regardless of what's on them.
This marks one of the first times the federal government has stepped into the debate in favor of environmental conservation. Previously, the Bush administration loosened restrictions on off-roading in national parks and has repeatedly made it easier for counties to claim RS 2477 road rights.
Comments
ugh, those ATV people ... they would drive around inside St. Peter's Basilica if they were allowed, and I don't see how the Kaiparowits is any less deserving of protection from them.
Posted by: Logan on 07/06/07 at 5:02 PM Respond
Well, I'm one of those ATV people (actually a dirtbiker), but I'm also a conservationist. I have no problem with staying off of protected lands. I actually prefer open desert and big dead sand dunes. The more lifeless the better. Bushes suck at high speed. (Bush sucks at any speed ;-).
Anyway, most of the riders (bikers, quaders, and sand railers) that I come across are responsible, clean and respectful of the environment and the offlimit areas because they know if they aren't they'll screw it up for all of us. But there is always that 10 percent or so that seem hellbent on getting even existing play areas shut down by showing no respect for the environment. I can't say much for the rock crawler crowd. That isn't as big here in SoCal as open desert riding. And, being that this is SoCal, we have a more conservationist view of things than a lot of the country even amoung our conservatives. Amazing though how those two words have nearly opposite meanings in the political world.
Anyway, as for these people who want to take their rock crawlers (or any mechanical toy for that matter) crushing over every last piece of scenic terrain they can and/or who don't have the decency to pack out their trash, I agree, let them pound sand. Literally, in this case.
The real problem is that there are just too many ignorant selfish people with too much money and time on their hands. The lame excuse that they have a right to see it just the same as hikers is complete B.S. Were that the case, then they'd revise their requests for access to include street-legal passenger vehicles only on groomed roads only to the overlooks and favorite spots. This would be far easier to get passed. But that's not what they want. Were we to open these areas up, the only real site seeing that would be happening is large groups of people watching huge mechanical toys happily destroying the habitat and the hikers will disappear.
Posted by: Sean on 07/09/07 at 4:03 PM Respond
It is so nice to hear that we are still attempting to keep what is sacred intact. There are so many beautiful lands left in our country...if we don't protect them now, they will be gone. How hard is that to understand? I applaud the responsible ATV folks who stay on trails and roads. When it comes to riding all over to "see it" we all know better. It is just silly to try and "see it" at 50 mph through (hopefully) the helmet shield as every little thing on the path, and off gets crushed for the sake of "seeing it"!
Posted by: Carrie on 07/25/07 at 8:47 AM Respond
thanks
Posted by: cilt bakımı on 02/13/08 at 12:47 PM Respond
ARCHIVE
February 10, 2008 - February 16, 2008
February 3, 2008 - February 9, 2008
January 27, 2008 - February 2, 2008
January 20, 2008 - January 26, 2008
January 13, 2008 - January 19, 2008
January 6, 2008 - January 12, 2008
December 30, 2007 - January 5, 2008
December 23, 2007 - December 29, 2007
December 16, 2007 - December 22, 2007
December 9, 2007 - December 15, 2007
December 2, 2007 - December 8, 2007
November 25, 2007 - December 1, 2007
November 18, 2007 - November 24, 2007
November 11, 2007 - November 17, 2007
November 4, 2007 - November 10, 2007
October 28, 2007 - November 3, 2007
October 21, 2007 - October 27, 2007
October 14, 2007 - October 20, 2007
October 7, 2007 - October 13, 2007
September 30, 2007 - October 6, 2007
September 23, 2007 - September 29, 2007
September 16, 2007 - September 22, 2007
September 9, 2007 - September 15, 2007
September 2, 2007 - September 8, 2007
August 26, 2007 - September 1, 2007
August 19, 2007 - August 25, 2007
August 12, 2007 - August 18, 2007
August 5, 2007 - August 11, 2007
July 29, 2007 - August 4, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
National Monument Saved From 4x4 Enthusiasts (4)
cilt bakımı wrote:
thanks...
[more]
NSA Warrantless Wiretapping Case Dismissed (2)
cilt bakımı wrote:
thanks...
[more]
Ron Paul Rallies the Troops; What's His Next Move? (21)
gravel kucinich paul nader wrote:
barack obama mike huckabee vs machine
huckabee obama:
we ...
[more]
Barack Obama's Messiah Complex (14)
Me wrote:
" I am sick of Obama's "message of hope"... Does anyone re...
[more]
The Continued Absurdity of the Missing White House Emails Case (1)
Ron Matuska wrote:
Right after WWII, the U.S. executed Japanese who had water...
[more]
Clinton to Obama: Yes We Can (2)
CW4Barak wrote:
Poor Hillariously Rotten Clinton...no matter what you do, ...
[more]
The John Edwards Endorsement: A Last Chance To Prove He's No Phony (75)
capt wrote:
"there is a 64 page Blueprint for Change on his website."
...
[more]
REALLY Bad News Day for Hillary Clinton (75)
ghart wrote:
i love you dagney taggart...
[more]
How Clinton Won California (24)
Disappointed by MJ wrote:
Why is it so surprising to you that Hispanic voters would ...
[more]
A Terrorist is Assassinated in Damascus: A Whodunnit (1)
b wrote:
/quote/
"That would be [the family of former Lebanese prim...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


RECENT ENTRIES
McCain & Co. Find New Ways to Circumvent Campaign Finance Laws McCain Wrote
Will Trouble in Afghanistan Become a Tough Campaign Issue for McCain?
MoJo Convo: Iran Panic? A Follow Up Question for the Experts
Blogger Brian Beutler Shot, Expected to Make Full Recovery
Video: DNC Hammers McCain on Economic Double Talk
McCain Denies Ever Saying He Lacks Expertise on Economy
Report: Interrogation Instructors at Gitmo Taught Communist Tactics from 1950s
One More Clinton Campaign Post-Mortem: No Hierarchy, No Trust, No Comity
How to Think about Immunity