« Regime Change Here at Home | Blog Index | Bush/Cheney Threats to the Endangered Species Act »
Contempt of Congress! Will Likely be Ignored!
A big step in the U.S. Attorneys case.
The House Judiciary Committee voted today to issue contempt citations for two of President Bush's most trusted aides, taking its most dramatic step yet towards a constitutional showdown with the White House over the Justice Department's dismissal of nine U.S. attorneys.
The panel voted 22-17, along party lines, to issue citations to Joshua B. Bolten, White House chief of staff, and Harriet E. Miers, former White House counsel. Both refused to comply with committee subpoenas after Bush declared that documents and testimony related to the prosecutor firings were protected by executive privilege.
It remains to be seen what this means, because after these contempt citations pass the full House they are referred to the U.S. Attorney of the District of Columbia, an employee of the Justice Department. And the White House has already said, in an unprecedented move, that it will block the DOJ from prosecuting any contempt charges. My dream scenario: Supreme Court showdown!
Posted by Jonathan Stein on 07/25/07 at 11:14 AM | E-mail | Print | Digg | de.licio.us | Reddit | Newsvine | Yahoo! MyWeb | StumbleUpon | Netscape | Google |
Comments
ARCHIVE
September 9, 2007 - September 15, 2007
September 2, 2007 - September 8, 2007
August 26, 2007 - September 1, 2007
August 19, 2007 - August 25, 2007
August 12, 2007 - August 18, 2007
August 5, 2007 - August 11, 2007
July 29, 2007 - August 4, 2007
April 22, 2007 - April 28, 2007
April 15, 2007 - April 21, 2007
April 8, 2007 - April 14, 2007
March 25, 2007 - March 31, 2007
March 18, 2007 - March 24, 2007
March 11, 2007 - March 17, 2007
March 4, 2007 - March 10, 2007
February 25, 2007 - March 3, 2007
February 18, 2007 - February 24, 2007
February 11, 2007 - February 17, 2007
February 4, 2007 - February 10, 2007
January 28, 2007 - February 3, 2007
January 21, 2007 - January 27, 2007
January 14, 2007 - January 20, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
More Bad News for Edwards, Obama (10)
MissDemeanor wrote:
I don't think John is being racist. I think John hates ev...
[more]
African Pentecostal Christians Destroying Ancient African Culture In Nigeria (18)
Muslim Watch wrote:
Mingora, 12 Sept. (AKI/DAWN) - In a grim reminder of the d...
[more]
Joe Lieberman is Now Almost Comically Hawkish (1)
Eric Ferguson wrote:
Petraeus' answer doesn't sound so much like "no" as like "...
[more]
One Special Dame: Remembering Anita Roddick (3)
Caroline Merriam wrote:
I knew Anita Roddick in Business for Social Responsibity. ...
[more]
Breaking: Sunni Tribal Leader Assassinated in Iraq (1)
Baghdad Mo wrote:
BAGHDAD, 13 (UPI) -- Al Qaida militants in Iraq have taken...
[more]
Ignite! Sparks More Controversy (3)
kirkbrew wrote:
You folks should look at this Ignite material. It is real...
[more]
Americans Fight Terrorism From the Jury Box (3)
gvc wrote:
Over the course of American history, juries made up of the...
[more]
Russia Explodes 'Father of All Bombs' (1)
Lin Geary wrote:
About comparing bomb sizes...The real Father of all Bombs ...
[more]
ABC News Investigates (Itself) (3)
LobaGirl wrote:
Unlike the university system in the US, higher education i...
[more]
NRA Offers Free Memberships to Soldiers (Step Up, Costco) (23)
Brian K wrote:
gvc,
Good point. It had stuck in my head as refering to bl...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33
"...the White House has already said ... that it will block the DOJ from prosecuting any contempt charges."
I guess the Democrats who control Congress (if they have the cojones) could then hold the President in contempt of Congress and we'd have ourselves a REAL showdown.
Posted by: gvc on 07/25/07 at 1:56 PM