« CARE Doesn't Want the U.S.' Money | Blog Index | Sometimes Fame Isn't Enough... »
'Mothballed' Russian Bombers Resume Long-Range Patrols
I wrote last week of a flight of Russian long-range bombers to the Pacific island of Guam. Well, the news today is that Putin has decided to make it a regular thing. From the BBC:
"We have decided to restore flights by Russian strategic aviation on a permanent basis," Mr Putin told reporters at joint military exercises with China and four Central Asian states in Russia's Ural mountains.
"In 1992, Russia unilaterally ended flights by its strategic aircraft to distant military patrol areas. Unfortunately, our example was not followed by everyone," Mr Putin said, in an apparent reference to the US.
"Flights by other countries' strategic aircraft continue and this creates certain problems for ensuring the security of the Russian Federation," he said.
In Washington, a state department spokesman, Sean McCormack, said Russia's decision was "interesting".
"If Russia feels as though they want to take some of these old aircraft out of mothballs and get them flying again, that's their decision," he told reporters.
One of the reasons Russia halted its flights 15 years ago was that it could no longer afford the fuel.
Today Moscow's coffers are stuffed full of oil money, says the BBC's Rupert Wingfield-Hayes in Moscow, and the Kremlin is determined to show it is still a military power to reckon with.
Posted by Bruce Falconer on 08/17/07 at 9:35 AM | E-mail | Print | Digg | de.licio.us | Reddit | Newsvine | Yahoo! MyWeb | StumbleUpon | Netscape | Google |
Comments
ARCHIVE
September 23, 2007 - September 29, 2007
September 16, 2007 - September 22, 2007
September 9, 2007 - September 15, 2007
September 2, 2007 - September 8, 2007
August 26, 2007 - September 1, 2007
August 19, 2007 - August 25, 2007
August 12, 2007 - August 18, 2007
August 5, 2007 - August 11, 2007
July 29, 2007 - August 4, 2007
April 22, 2007 - April 28, 2007
April 15, 2007 - April 21, 2007
April 8, 2007 - April 14, 2007
March 25, 2007 - March 31, 2007
March 18, 2007 - March 24, 2007
March 11, 2007 - March 17, 2007
March 4, 2007 - March 10, 2007
February 25, 2007 - March 3, 2007
February 18, 2007 - February 24, 2007
February 11, 2007 - February 17, 2007
February 4, 2007 - February 10, 2007
January 28, 2007 - February 3, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
Dobson Slams Fred Thompson in Private Email (2)
"Goober" wrote:
No Jon, that leaves RON PAUL.
Dobson has a big mouth, like...
[more]
Burma: Saffron Flames Rage Against the Machine (1)
gvc wrote:
["Too bad the US' foreign policies in Asia are not consist...
[more]
Republicans Can't Find the Cash to Campaign (2)
gvc wrote:
Jonathan, I don't think all the necessary information is t...
[more]
U.S. Always Outsourcing, More Contractors Than U.S. Troops in Iraq (8)
gvc wrote:
I thought the actual details of this had already been poin...
[more]
College Students: You've Been F#%'D! (7)
gvc wrote:
I've read quite a bit of Ursula K, but to be honest, I alw...
[more]
Secretary of Defense to Ask for $180 Billion for Iraq, Afghanistan Wars (4)
Mildred wrote:
Vote third party. Vote green. ...
[more]
Nixon Hated the Jews: Even More Evidence (2)
Ira wrote:
Who cares. The Jews hate Christians and Muslims. Just read...
[more]
Sunni Insurgents Launch Assassination Campaign (3)
youtoob wrote:
bookworm, that didn't even make sense!...
[more]
"Stop Hillary Clinton" Now the Largest Political Facebook Group (18)
Stephen Fox wrote:
After everything is said and done in this election, a few ...
[more]
Hilarious Website of the Week: Cops Bitching About Other Cops (5)
JT Barrie wrote:
The problem is that police know how ridiculous their own...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


This just may not be quite as bad as it sounds. When we lived under MAD (mutually assured destruction, for any who don't remember), we weren't quite as cocky and heavy-handed as we are now, stomping into any country we feel like for any imagined reason. Perhaps, the world, including ourselves) really was safer with MAD. That doesn't mean this isn't scaring the screaming heebie jeebies out of me. It is, just possibly a bit less so than our current situation. Besides, it'll make for a nice round of midnight showings of Dr. Strangelove, possibly even a remake.
Of course, the global warming caused by this is still an obvious issue. Maybe they (and we) need alternate fuel bombers. How about electric ones with solar panels to increase range? I bet the defense contractors would have no problem competing for the contracts to build them.
If anyone can identify the parts of this that are humor vs. sarcasm vs. seriousness, please let me know. I'm not sure myself.
Posted by: Misanthropic Scott on 08/17/07 at 12:23 PM