MOTHER JONES BY E-MAIL

«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»

Why Banks Want Your Checks to Bounce

Back in the day, writing bad checks used to be a criminal offense. Now, it's a profit center. Banks make an eye-popping $17.5 billion a year by encouraging us to overdraw our checking accounts. Banks hold on to deposits and clear checks in a way that ensures the maximum number of bounces, regardless of when the checks were actually cashed. They let us use ATM and debit cards even when there's no money in our accounts. Then they charge us $34 a pop for the favor. Some banks even charge extra fees for every day an account is in the red, turning overdraft "protection" into a form of loansharking, with interest rates that would make Tony Soprano blush. Except when banks do it, it's all legal.

Tomorrow, the U.S. House Financial Services Committee will vote on a bill that might change some of this. Among other things, H.R. 946 would prohibit banks from manipulating check-clearing to enhance overdraft fees and require banks to warn customers that their accounts are overdrawn before allowing them to make a purchase with a debit card or make an ATM withdrawal. Seems sensible enough, but expect a major fight over this one, given the money involved. You can read more about overdraft abuses here.






Comments

Banks already create money out of thin air. ATM fees and bounced check fees are a drop in the bucket compared to what's really going on with banks and the Fed (an organization of private bankers, allowed to dictate monetary policy for the government)

Money that people and businesses OWE to banks is counted as "assets".
With the increased "assets" represented by the money they don't really have in the vault or in real reserves, they are legally allowed to loan out MORE money, and thereby create still greater "assets".

It's a brilliant Ponzi Scheme, and NO, you can't blame it all on Bush and the Republicans!
It's much older than that.

If and when it ever collapses, the "Great Depression" will look like it was a GREAT time to be alive.

Posted by: gvc on 09/24/07 at 9:39 AM  Respond

The neo-con talk radio and shill mill has focused America on cutting taxes that, in principle, help everyone, while ignoring bank fees, which only help the banks and their shareholders. America's tax cuts have merely been channeled to the banks and credit companies. Everyone needs to ask themselves: how much do I pay in taxes (state, federal, sales) and how much do I pay bankers (mortgage interest, credit card interest, fees and all the rest) I'd rather pay taxes, use no credit, and pay nothing to the banks. Every argument used against paying taxes could be applied toward paying banks.

Posted by: slanted tom on 09/24/07 at 9:45 AM  Respond

slanted tom said: "The neo-con talk radio and shill mill has focused America on cutting taxes..."

Tom, you really think that a majority of Americans actually LISTEN to those annoying, boring stiffs?
If they do, and if they're absorbing what comes out of their tinny little radio speakers, then the neocons ought to be winning elections by landslide margins.

Maybe Americans just DO think their tax burden is too high, that government is funding too many stupid, costly and useless things at the citizens' expense, and talk radio is not so much a driving force in that thinking as you assume.

God, don't I miss the old "Proxmire Golden Fleece" award!

Posted by: jet on 09/24/07 at 11:37 AM  Respond

GVC - help me understand what is part of the Ponzi scheme? Should Banks not charge ANYTHING for their services? ATMs allow you to get cash practically anytime. If you don't want to pay the fee, go to the banking center and withdraw the money. Should the bank loan you whatever amount of money you want and you can use it for free and pay it back whenever you feel like? What do you consider fair?

"They let us use ATM and debit cards even when there's no money in our accounts. " I'm tired of people whining about fees for things that can be avoided if they take some personal responsibility. If you don't want overdraft fees, balance your checkbook and don't overdraw your account. Don't expect the Bank to be your babysitter. If you don't want to pay credit card interest, don't charge more than you can pay back in a month.

Posted by: The sister on 09/24/07 at 12:40 PM  Respond

I suggest renting a DVD called "Maxed Out" a real eye opener...something else to think about MBNA (Bank Of America) was the second largest contributer to the Bush Campaign..do you really think that Congress will pass a bill that would be fair to consumers....or that Bush wouldn't veto a bill that would go against Bank interests...?

Posted by: chabuka on 09/24/07 at 1:09 PM  Respond

I once asked my bank why they let me draw out more money from my account from an ATM then I had in it. They told me, "Its your responsibility to maintain your balance, not ours." Yet, two years later when a teller accidentally deposited $30,000 into my checking account, I wasn't allowed to keep it...

Posted by: Colton on 09/24/07 at 2:07 PM  Respond

To The sister:
The way government banking rules allow banks to create "assets" from thin air is a ponzi scheme.

Check this out when you've got time:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-9050474362583451279

It SHOULD scare the crap out of you.
Bounce fees and ATM fees won't seem like much to worry about.

Posted by: gvc on 09/24/07 at 2:26 PM  Respond

chabuka:
Bush isn't the only one in gov't taking massive handouts from bankers and financiers.

Check out Pelosi:
"Real Estate" her top industry, followed by "Securities & Investments"
http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/indus.asp?CID=N00007360&cycle=2006

Hillary:
"Lawyers" followed by "Securities & Investments"
http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/indus.asp?CID=N00000019&cycle=2006

Mitt:
"Securities & Investments" again
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/indus.asp?id=N00000286&cycle=2008

Rudy:
"Securities & Investments" and "Lawyers"
(Getting a bit predictable by now, isn't it?)
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/indus.asp?id=N00009908&cycle=2008

How 'bout Barak:
Gee..., who'd have guessed? "Lawyers" followed by "Securities & Investments"
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/indus.asp?id=N00009638&cycle=2008

But LOOK WHO LIKES Ron Paul:
US Navy, US Army and US Air Force are among his top five (has to be service MEMBERS, cause the services themselves can't be involved in politics)
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/contrib.asp?id=N00005906&cycle=2008

WHO SAYS the troops want to stay in Iraq?!?!

Posted by: gvc on 09/24/07 at 2:47 PM  Respond

i dig where you're coming from, sister, but holding people accountable for screwing up is one thing, while blatantly taking advantage of them is another. banks know what a hassle it is to switch banks, so they take advantage of that and maximize fees, based not on what's reasonable, but how how far they can push you. additionally, banks are more than happy to babysit, offering every stupid, pointless service imaginable, but they also gauge you every chance they get (in my recent experience at least). i hate my bank, as you can see.

Posted by: gonz on 09/24/07 at 3:00 PM  Respond

Tell your bank you want to "opt out" This means that if there are not adequate funds to cover your debit card purchase, the purchase will reject. It can cause a bit of embarassment at the checkout at times, but can save you a bundle in the long run.
Also, keep in mind that the best way to avoid bank fees is to keep your eyes on your fries. I work in a call center and the major reason for people getting in this bind is not paying attention to their balance.

Posted by: thinkgra on 09/24/07 at 3:52 PM  Respond

This is the most pathetic era in our presidential history.With a president if ever diasected for unscrupulous monetary transactions he would be #1.Therefore he is laughing all the way to the bank. With legalized extortion, rampid corruption and unaccountability and irresponsibility this president is the worst example of ethics in history.
Especially when the free for all taking place has no rules..

Posted by: MAKESENSEOFIT on 09/25/07 at 5:06 PM  Respond

MAKESENSEOFIT, I Know how rewarding it is to throw a dart at Dubya's photo, and have it nail the forehead, dead center..., nice & deep, but did you bother to check out all those "opensecrets.org" links that show you how just about ALL the top tier politicians from BOTH Big parties are hip deep in money from big financial interests?
In SPITE of all the Grandstanding you'll see from the Dems on this issue, if you look at where their campaign money is coming from, it's hard to believe that:
A - THEY didn't have a hand in creating the situation we've got.
and
B - THEY're about to do anything REAL to correct it.

Posted by: gvc on 09/26/07 at 7:34 AM  Respond

I've just directed a film about the whole mess, called Overdrawn!, with Ralph Nader and Joel Bakan ("The Corporation"). We need to encourage people to call their representatives to support Maloney's bill!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUXRBehEuH0

The subject of a very wonderful and distinct

I thank you for continuing excellence

Thank you

Post a comment





 

RECENT COMMENTS

Why Banks Want Your Checks to Bounce (14)
ليبيا wrote: The subject of a very wonderful and distinct I thank you... [more]

Nebraska Teacher Taken Out Of Classroom For Showing Iraq Documentary (42)
برامج wrote: The subject of a very wonderful and distinct I thank you... [more]

Women's News: Sublime and Heinous (7)
tallie wrote: It always amazes me how the comments associated with blog ... [more]

One Problem With Hillary as VP (6)
MarthaA wrote: Hillary Clinton is too wild eyed when talking about her ho... [more]

Is Clinton Staying In To Say, "I Told You So"? (168)
greg grant wrote: I don't understand... How can race be an issue? Blacks cla... [more]

John McCain and the Dictator Money Trail (16)
Jack Ryan wrote: It is doubtful that McCain knew of this, while Saint Obama... [more]

State Pols: Kill Child Molesters (7)
Rachel wrote: Porno doesn't cause child molestation, nitwit, and child p... [more]

Hillary: Too Old For High Court (13)
Michael L. Wagner wrote: Well apparently someone missed my point with WILL--it's li... [more]

Pelosi Throws Down Gauntlet on Contempt (3)
Francis Jens Erickson wrote: If only there existed a rule of law within the white house... [more]

Obama and Clinton in Withdrawal Talks (16)
MarthaA wrote: EXTREMIST George W. Bush was RIGHT WING selected -- not el... [more]

XML RSS Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.33

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com

















bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN


This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2008 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS