MOTHER JONES BY E-MAIL
MoJo Blog Home

«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»

Senators Write Letters & Demand Torture Docs

The chairman of the Senate Intelligence committee Jay Rockefeller writes to acting attorney general Peter Keisler, asking why the New York Times has copies of secret torture memoes that the Justice Department has so far refused to turn over to the appropriate Congressional oversight committees, among them his.

Letter below:

October 4, 2007

The Honorable Peter D. Keisler
Acting Attorney General
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20530

Dear Mr. Acting Attorney General:

The New York Times published an article today entitled “Secret U.S. Endorsement of Severe Interrogations” that describes the classified opinions provided by the Department of Justice on the legality of the CIA’s interrogation practices, as well as the internal deliberations surrounding those classified opinions. As Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence I have repeatedly asked the Department of Justice to provide those classified opinions; the Department of Justice has never provided a formal response.

This letter reiterates my longstanding request for the opinions of the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel analyzing the legality of the CIA’s interrogation program. In particular, please provide the principal classified Office of Legal Counsel opinions issued since December of 2004 on the legality of CIA’s interrogation program. This should include Office of Legal Counsel opinions assessing the legality of the CIA’s practices under section 2340A of the U.S. criminal code, which implements the Convention Against Torture; the substantive provisions of Article 16 of the Convention Against Torture; the Detainee Treatment Act; Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions; and the War Crimes Act, as amended by the Military Commissions Act.


The Department of Justice’s failure to provide the Intelligence Committee with any of the Office of Legal Counsel’s opinions on the CIA’s interrogation program calls into question this Committee’s ability to oversee the CIA’s program. If the Department of Justice refuses to provide even those public officials charged with oversight of the program information that is critical to an appropriate assessment of the program, why should the public have confidence that the program is either legal or in the best interests of the United States? I find it unfathomable that the Committee tasked with oversight of the CIA’s interrogation and detention program would be provided more information by the New York Times than by the Department of Justice.

I appreciate your prompt response.

Sincerely,

John D. Rockefeller IV

Chairman

Leave a Comment »

Posted by Laura Rozen on 10/05/07 at 6:51 AM | E-mail | Print | Digg | de.licio.us | Reddit | Newsvine | Yahoo! MyWeb | StumbleUpon | Netscape | Google |

Technorati Tags: | | | | |



Comments

I don't suggest for second DOJ shouldn't hand that document to the Congress, but perhaps a journalist can answer this. Why doesn't the Times give a copy to the Congress?

Posted by: Eric Ferguson on 10/05/07 at 1:25 PM

I suspect that someone in DOJ wanted the word out on the real position of the Bush administration on torture. Perhaps whoever it is feels adverse to the public nature of congressional oversight and may be fearful of retribution from within the department or the White House if called forward by Congress. Bush has said very publicly "we don't torture." Like many other occasions that statement is obviously a word twist. Words used to create an impression but otherwise words that are meaningless. The DOJ is in a fix because they have in their hands potential criminal evidence. They are required to deal with it in a legal and public manner through the courts and congress. It will be interesting to see how DOJ gets around this one. Can anybody say "executive privilege?"

Posted by: williamf on 10/07/07 at 2:44 AM

Post a comment





 

RECENT COMMENTS

Superdome Redux, San Diego Style (8)
Elizabeth wrote: Carlos, your comment is uncalled for. Watch it or you'll g... [more]

Either Mike Huckabee is Really Bad at Math, or He Has His Facts Wrong (1)
yowoyemi wrote: Being clegy did not stop them from enslaving Native Americ... [more]

Title IX--35 Years Old And Still Misunderstood (10)
Goober wrote: irishgawdess: "Enjoy your time kicking back and living off... [more]

The Blackwater Suit You've Never Read About (1)
Dorey wrote: He seems to be a bit of a crackpot, but, heck, his heart i... [more]

Kurdish Guerrillas Are Out of Control, and We're Making it Worse (2)
Jonathan Stein wrote: Here's what the New York Times says about PKK vs. PJAK: "... [more]

Obama and McClurkin: Two for Which Road? (5)
August Bebel wrote: Gays are petite bourgeoisie not progressives according to... [more]

God Bless You, Jonathan Stein (1)
Circe wrote: I know most of you haveprobably read this, still fun thoug... [more]

That's Why It's Called the Nobel, Not the Noble (12)
Geri wrote: Fact Checker, you just proved Dr. Watson's point that Afri... [more]

The Onion Gets It Right Again (3)
kirkbrew wrote: Karl – Can not disagree more. The Neo-cons WANT people to... [more]

Black Macho and the Myth of the Super Predator: The PTSD connection (19)
lunanoire wrote: Scott I commend you for your achievements, but I also wond... [more]

XML RSS Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.33

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com

















bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN


This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2007 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS