«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
House Dem Bill Would Deny Telcos Retroactive Immunity for Domestic Snooping
Congressional Quarterly's Tim Starks reports:
Intelligence Chairman Silvestre Reyes, D-Texas, said Thursday that the bill [governing electronic surveillance] would not grant retroactive liability protection to telecommunications firms that cooperated with government surveillance efforts since the Sept. 11 attacks, which Republicans say is essential.
Reyes also said he favors a requirement that intelligence agencies secure a warrant for monitoring communications involving U.S. citizens in the United States beyond a short emergency period, even if the target of the surveillance is a foreigner located outside the country.
But Reyes did not specify whether the legislation would mandate individual warrants in all cases, as civil liberties advocates are seeking, or broader, programmatic court approval for international surveillance. ...
But, Starks reports, Senate Dems may cave:
Senate Intelligence Chairman John D. Rockefeller IV, D-W.Va., is negotiating legislation with Christopher S. Bond, R-Mo., with an eye toward marking up legislation Oct. 18. No details have been made available about that bill, but civil liberties advocates are worried that the Senate measure will include retroactive liability protection for telecommunications firms.
Leave a Comment »
Posted by Laura Rozen on 10/05/07 at 2:40 PM | E-mail | Print | Digg | de.licio.us | Reddit | Newsvine | Yahoo! MyWeb | StumbleUpon | Netscape | Google |
Technorati Tags: intelligence | telecommunications | domestic spying | reyes | rockefeller | congressional quarterly | civil liberties
Comments
you suppose they'll be as successful at passing this as they have been at making Bush stop the unconstitutional spying in the first place, and bringing the occupation of Iraq to a conclusion?
[Senate Intelligence Chairman John D. Rockefeller IV, D-W.Va., is negotiating legislation with Christopher S. Bond, R-Mo., with an eye toward marking up legislation Oct. 18. No details have been made available about that bill, but civil liberties advocates are worried that the Senate measure will include retroactive liability protection for telecommunications firms.]
my bet is that the "John D. Rockefeller IV - Christopher S. Bond" bill will be what we'll get from the Democrats and their bosom buddies, the Republicans, and the rule of law and the 4th amendment can take a hike
don't you just love this part of how the Dem majority is doing business:
"No details have been made available about that bill"
so exactly what is different about the way the Dems are running government than the way the Bushwackers have done it?
Posted by: jet on 10/05/07 at 3:03 PM
Call me a broken record, but
I firmly believe we'd have
our moon base today and more
if it wasn't for these people
sitting around on the government dime reading other people's email...then, you
get into this really interesting issue called 'intellectual property', and EMPLOYERS
snooping down on their employees, nevermind 'the government', it really gets
fun when you start talking
about private companies.
Don't record your personal
inventions, something you might try to patent, on a
computer connected to th'innirnit...
Posted by: Bert on 10/06/07 at 10:13 AM
ARCHIVE
October 21, 2007 - October 27, 2007
October 14, 2007 - October 20, 2007
October 7, 2007 - October 13, 2007
September 30, 2007 - October 6, 2007
September 23, 2007 - September 29, 2007
September 16, 2007 - September 22, 2007
September 9, 2007 - September 15, 2007
September 2, 2007 - September 8, 2007
August 26, 2007 - September 1, 2007
August 19, 2007 - August 25, 2007
August 12, 2007 - August 18, 2007
August 5, 2007 - August 11, 2007
July 29, 2007 - August 4, 2007
April 22, 2007 - April 28, 2007
April 15, 2007 - April 21, 2007
April 8, 2007 - April 14, 2007
March 25, 2007 - March 31, 2007
March 18, 2007 - March 24, 2007
March 11, 2007 - March 17, 2007
March 4, 2007 - March 10, 2007
February 25, 2007 - March 3, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
Superdome Redux, San Diego Style (8)
Elizabeth wrote:
Carlos, your comment is uncalled for. Watch it or you'll g...
[more]
Either Mike Huckabee is Really Bad at Math, or He Has His Facts Wrong (1)
yowoyemi wrote:
Being clegy did not stop them from enslaving Native Americ...
[more]
Title IX--35 Years Old And Still Misunderstood (10)
Goober wrote:
irishgawdess: "Enjoy your time kicking back and living off...
[more]
The Blackwater Suit You've Never Read About (1)
Dorey wrote:
He seems to be a bit of a crackpot, but, heck, his heart i...
[more]
Kurdish Guerrillas Are Out of Control, and We're Making it Worse (2)
Jonathan Stein wrote:
Here's what the New York Times says about PKK vs. PJAK:
"...
[more]
Obama and McClurkin: Two for Which Road? (5)
August Bebel wrote:
Gays are petite bourgeoisie not progressives according to...
[more]
God Bless You, Jonathan Stein (1)
Circe wrote:
I know most of you haveprobably read this, still fun thoug...
[more]
That's Why It's Called the Nobel, Not the Noble (12)
Geri wrote:
Fact Checker, you just proved Dr. Watson's point that Afri...
[more]
The Onion Gets It Right Again (3)
kirkbrew wrote:
Karl – Can not disagree more. The Neo-cons WANT people to...
[more]
Black Macho and the Myth of the Super Predator: The PTSD connection (19)
lunanoire wrote:
Scott
I commend you for your achievements, but I also wond...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33



RECENT ENTRIES
McCain Confuses Voters (and Himself?) on Spending Cuts
Brent Scowcroft on the Cuba Embargo: "It Doesn't Do Anything"
Which Dictators Are Too Awful?
Obama Goes General
Clinton Campaign Keeps On Pushing Bogus Rationale
More on McCain's Climate Change Speech Today
China Outlaws Pringles and Fanta
The Weird McCain-Dictator Connection
Bob Barr Throws Down Gauntlet to Ron Paul