MOTHER JONES BY E-MAIL

«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»

Thompson Speaks With Substance. What?

In the speech he just gave to the assembled Christian politicos, Fred Thompson bucked the trend by actually laying out some positions and issue ideas. Revolutionary idea for a presidential candidate...

Mixed with a certain degree of pablum (Examples: "We live in the greatest country in the history of the world. Our obligation is to do everything we can to keep it that way." "We must pass good laws. We must stop bad laws."), Thompson took strong positions on the following issues: (1) Unborn babies. (2) Courts. (3) Gays. (4) National debt. (5) "Global conflict with radical Islam."

Those positions were: (1) Save 'em. When Fred Thompson saw the sonogram of his youngest daughter, he knew he could never be anything but pro-life.

(2) Stop 'em. "Too often, it is our judicial branch of government that violates our approved law." (I thought that was called a check and/or balance?) Courts make our social and cultural rules, Thompson argues, and that's just wrong. We need more judges like Chief Justice John Roberts.

(3) Don't let 'em marry. No elaboration needed.

(4) Fight it. We're leaving near-fatal levels of national debt to future generations, who are too young to have a seat at the table during this discussion.

(5) Win it. Duh.

I'll add three things. Because I like numbering, apparently.

(1) Thompson is a clumsy panderer. Witness how he closed his speech: "I don't really know what I would do in my first 100 days... I know what I would do the first hour that I was president. I would go into the Oval Office and close the door and pray for the wisdom to know what was right [cheers] and I would pray for the strength to do what is right."

That could have been phrased better.

(2) There was little excitement during Thompson's speech. Tancredo easily showed more fire and charisma than Thompson.

(3) There was a lot of talk of staying the course, from Thompson and the other candidates. "We will win, if we are persistent," said Thompson. He was referring to reforming the courts, but he could have been referring to inculcating the conservative ideology in American culture, or to the permanent Republican majority. It seems the Republicans here know their short-term prospects are dim. They're taking the long view. What else can they do?

Oh, and one other thing: this place is overflowing with Thompson volunteers. And while Thompson didn't strike out at his opponents, his staffers are handing out a flier that absolutely shreds Giuliani and Romney on their positions on abortion and gay rights. When I get back to the office, I'll try to scan it and post it as a pdf.

Thompson Speaks With Substance. What?

Leave a Comment »

RECENT ENTRIES

Comments

ARCHIVE

RECENT COMMENTS

THE CURRENT ISSUE

SEARCH MOTHER JONES

PHOTO ESSAYS

TODAY ON...

SPECIAL REPORTS

INTERVIEWS

LETTERS

BLOG LINKS

MOJO BLOGGERS

IN PRINT

DONATE TODAY