«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
D.C.'s Rich Get Richer (and Black Folks Get Nowhere)
If George Bush wanted to make record rates of income inequality a major legacy of his administration, he has succeeded wildly right here at home in D.C. A new study by the D.C. Fiscal Policy Institute shows that the nation's capital leads the country in both high poverty rates and the income gap between white and black people.

The median income for white people in the nation's capital has skyrocketed to $92,000 in 2006, from $55,000 in 1980. (Apparently all those lobbyists here are really bumping up the numbers!). But the city's black population (nearly 70 percent of city residents) has actually seen its median income fall since 1980, by .6 percent to $34,500. D.C.'s poverty rate is the highest it's been in a decade, and the unemployment rate among black adults is at a 30-year-high. These numbers are all the more stunning when you consider how bad things were ten years ago: the District government was creeping out of bankruptcy, Marion Barry was mayor, and the Redskins has just decamped for Maryland.
The latest bump in poverty and unemployment has occurred during a time of great prosperity in the city, and it's worse than nearly every other major city in America. I can never figure out why the political establishment isn't more ashamed about this. But I guess if you can let New Orleans drown, it's not that hard to ignore the starving masses in the shadow of the White House.
Leave a Comment »
Posted by Stephanie Mencimer on 10/24/07 at 11:33 AM | E-mail | Print | Digg | de.licio.us | Reddit | Newsvine | Yahoo! MyWeb | StumbleUpon | Netscape | Google |
Technorati Tags: poverty | d.c. | new orleans | unemployment | white house | george bush
Comments
Somebody's been working hard. Does the chart look at the self employed, like those selling contraband? Add that up and things are more equal.
Posted by: Willy on 10/24/07 at 3:24 PM Respond
While I like to blame everything on bush as much as the next guy, using numbers from 1980 is going a bit far. I suspect numbers from 2000 weren't used specifically because 1980 made the charts more dramatic.
Posted by: Gary on 10/25/07 at 4:31 AM Respond
This is a bad example to use in talking about rich and poor. D.C. is a company town. Powerful-- and wealthy, because the two go hand in hand-- people move there, skewing the numbers of rich upward. As the overall wealth of the U.S. increases, the median level of wealth of politicians goes up, too. Poor people stay the same.
Posted by: Forrest on 10/25/07 at 6:36 AM Respond
I'll leave Willy's idiocy aside. I think Forrest has a good point that can be tied to trends in gentrification, where the numbers are changing as more well-off white people who work in D.C. are deciding that it's actually cooler than VA and MD. But I agree w/ Stephanie that this is shameful and that it isn't as simple as D.C. just being a "company town."
Posted by: Kia on 10/25/07 at 8:20 AM Respond
ARCHIVE
October 21, 2007 - October 27, 2007
October 14, 2007 - October 20, 2007
October 7, 2007 - October 13, 2007
September 30, 2007 - October 6, 2007
September 23, 2007 - September 29, 2007
September 16, 2007 - September 22, 2007
September 9, 2007 - September 15, 2007
September 2, 2007 - September 8, 2007
August 26, 2007 - September 1, 2007
August 19, 2007 - August 25, 2007
August 12, 2007 - August 18, 2007
August 5, 2007 - August 11, 2007
July 29, 2007 - August 4, 2007
April 22, 2007 - April 28, 2007
April 15, 2007 - April 21, 2007
April 8, 2007 - April 14, 2007
March 25, 2007 - March 31, 2007
March 18, 2007 - March 24, 2007
March 11, 2007 - March 17, 2007
March 4, 2007 - March 10, 2007
February 25, 2007 - March 3, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
People Are Crazy, Mike Huckabee-Edition (4)
LANE HAGOOD wrote:
By the way, you sound like your are discriminating on the ...
[more]
Conservative Blog Bans Ron Paul Supporters (9)
Neil B. wrote:
Mitch - corporations only exist as entities with limited l...
[more]
52-Year-Old Scientific Paper Retracted Due to Enthusiam Amongst Creationists (1)
Neil Bates wrote:
Dr. Jacobsen shouldn't retract the paper unless it really ...
[more]
Fox News Speculates: al Qaeda Behind California Fires? (7)
Manuel Guzman Lopez wrote:
Sometimes we may have reason when making an observation o...
[more]
Superdome Redux, San Diego Style (33)
Katie wrote:
I think comparing New Orleans to San Diego is more than a ...
[more]
FEMA's Fake Press Conference (1)
blue wrote:
There are some resignations in order.
FEMA (and this admi...
[more]
U.S. Imposes Toughest New Sanctions on Iran Since '79 Embassy Seizure (4)
jet wrote:
at least 28 of the 51 democrats in the senate voted to urg...
[more]
That's Why It's Called the Nobel, Not the Noble (14)
Terri wrote:
First, someone needs to show me empirical evidence that an...
[more]
Stephen Colbert's Fictional Campaign Beating Real Republicans in South Carolina (2)
jimmy w wrote:
If they keep letting bush and republicans tell them what, ...
[more]
That Was Quick: Times Tackles Rudy Story (2)
Andrew Nordhausen wrote:
Anyone here notice that the same people
who complain the m...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33



RECENT ENTRIES
Canadian Corporal Killed by "Roommate's Rifle" in Afghanistan, Case Goes to Court Martial
Is Blackwater Leaving the Security Biz?
Some Inconvenient Truths About The Olympics
Liberal Lawyer Helping Louisiana Kill That Guy
Fifty Years Without Running Water
While Troops Travel in Squalor, Air Force Brass Choose Swatches for First Class Cabins
Iraq: Provincial Elections Could Be Delayed
Minimum Wage Goes Up Thursday
Phil Gramm: Gone But Not Forgotten