what did we expect after a 76 to 22 vote in the Senate urging george dubya bullsh to designate a branch of Iran's military as "a terrorist organization"?

yes, a 76 to 22 vote would necessarily include over half of the Senate's democrats since Repubs Dick Lugar and Chuck Hagel voted 'no' on the resolution.
so tomorrow, when you hear Dems lay a bunch of blame on bullsh for this action, you know they're over half-way full of ****

Jet, your rant is incoherent.

I believe that the current administration will attack Iran in one way or another before the elections in 2008. I don't know how this will be justified or, or if the administration will even try. But justification matters very little, since it will be a flagrant attempt to influence those elections. It will be a shame that many people will have to die in an attempt by the Ruling Party of America to try to retain power.

at least 28 of the 51 democrats in the senate voted to urge George Dubya Bush to declare the Iranian army's revolutionary guard a foreign terrorist organization, thereby giving him all the political cover he needs to harrass Iran in whatever way his twisted little mind sees fit.
www.nytimes.com/2007/09/27/washington/27cong.html
if the dems turn around later and act like they had nothing to do with it, they're as full of shit as Karl Rove.

clear enough this time?

"Administration officials say that they are imposing new sanctions to demonstrate a commitment to diplomacy..."

isn't their "commitment to diplomacy" missing a key ingredient... namely; some diplomacy? maybe a diplomat or any contact with the Iranian government in say, the last thirty years?

Much better Jet. I agree with you.