Ms. Clinton wants to win, hence the human chameleon. This is nothing new in a politician. Ever notice that Bill Clinton and Bush Sr. are such good friends. That should tell you about the future.

I think Chris Dodd is right on target with decriminalization. Personally I think it should be fully legalized and regulated, like alcohol, but removing penalties for possession is a very good first step. Once people stop going to jail for it, people will start to understand how the effects of prohibition - the black market, low quality, high prices, high crime and violence - is not worth keeping that policy.

I, too, noticed Clinton's unsettling "me too" habit. The most disturbing moment was after she had given her own convoluted explanation and justification of her Kyk/Leiberman vote. Joe Biden followed with an excellent, educated and informative answer. Clinton immediately butted in with "I agree with Joe." What I found frightening was the look on her face. It appeared that Biden's far-reaching take on the Iranian situation had never occured to her.

I'm hoping both Clinton and Obama have peaked early.

They are already driving, give them a license so they can get a car insurance. Before 9/11 it was common practice. And the terrorists from 9/11 had FL licenses not fake ones. They flew into this country, they had visas, TODAY A TERRORIST OR ANYONE WHO FLIES INTO THIS COUNTRY WITH A VISA LIKE THE TERRORISTS DID BEFORE 9/11 CAN STILL GET A LICENSE. Nothing changed for the terrorists.

THIS IS BS. Illegals are not terrorists. Give them licenses.

I don't think Democrats will appreciate the campaign turning into a "trash-Hillary" party. There are ways to attack her on the issues, but most Dems will not cotton to personal attacks on Hillary: they know she has been fighting the Republicans for years, they know the GOP can't stand her because she is a strong survivor, and they appreciate her for that if nothing else. They may not agree with her on some issues, but Democrats do still admire her, as evidenced by her incredible leads in all polls despite all the naysaying. By bullying her, Obama and Edwards are not going to cause people who have supported Clinton all this time, through all the withering attacks over the years, to suddenly change their minds. They're just going to make Clinton Democrats rally around her, like they did for Bill during the impeachment witch-hunt. I admire Hillary more now than ever for her strength in weathering these attacks, because they make the attackers look like desperate losers to me. True or not, that's how I felt after last night. I have my reservations about Hillary, but I was not comfortable with last night's ambush at all. I suspect those who already support her feel the same way and will fight on her behalf even more strongly moving forward.

I fully agree with your articlce and I don't know why (I mean I do know why the media is propping her up) they are propping her up but, after last night she should have lost any commanding lead she had. Anyone who actually watched the debate last night should not be comfortable with her leadership desicions for the same reasons you mentioned in your article and her terrible descisions that were in turn used against her last night.

I've noticed this habit of hers for quite awhile.
that is why Obama waited so long to vote a while back. he knows clinton does the follow and me too with him like a little puppy. She does it to blur the lines between her and the others.
But, sometimes I think it's because she has no real idea where she really stands on issues and so, just follows whoever for direction.