«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
Fred Thompson's Surprising Social Moderation
Fred Thompson had this to say on Meet the Press today, via Marc Ambinder:
MR. RUSSERT: This is the 2004 Republican Party platform, and here it is: "We say the unborn child has a fundamental individual right to life which cannot be infringed. We support a human life amendment to the Constitution"... Could you run as a candidate on that platform, promising a human life amendment banning all abortions?
MR. THOMPSON: No... No. I have always—and that's been my position the entire time I've been in politics. I thought Roe v. Wade was wrongly decided. I think this platform originally came out as a response to particularly Roe v. Wade because of that. Before Roe v. Wade, states made those decisions. I think people ought to be free at state and local levels to make decisions that even Fred Thompson disagrees with. That's what freedom is all about. And I think the diversity we have among the states, the system of federalism we have where power is divided between the state and the federal government is, is, is—serves us very, very well. I think that's true of abortion. I think Roe v. Wade hopefully one day will be overturned, and we can go back to the pre-Roe v. Wade days. But...
MR. RUSSERT: Each state would make their own abortion laws.
MR. THOMPSON: Yeah.
Bravo for not pandering, Mr. Thompson, though you've made your life just a little bit harder. Also, this is tricky issue on which to apply the old federalism argument. If you believe life begins at conception, it's hard to argue that states ought to make their own laws. Life ought to be protected everywhere. If you believe women have a fundamental right to control their own bodies, then you believe that right ought to be protected everywhere. This isn't like school vouchers or gun laws. Inalienable rights are in question.
Anyway, I also liked this from MSNBC's First Read:
We noticed more than 30 "umms" from Thompson before losing count and at least nine throat clearings -- often right before answering a difficult question.
Yeah, he's not the slickest guy in the world.
Leave a Comment »
Posted by Jonathan Stein on 11/04/07 at 2:27 PM | E-mail | Print | Digg | de.licio.us | Reddit | Newsvine | Yahoo! MyWeb | StumbleUpon | Netscape | Google |
Comments
sucks
Posted by: slanted tom on 11/04/07 at 3:38 PM Respond
The same argument was made by Southern States for Jim Crow and segregation. Bravo Thompson. You are back to your conservative roots!
Posted by: kirkbrew on 11/05/07 at 9:23 AM Respond
I'm always surprised to come across an actor who's a "conservative" of long standing, such as the Gipper, The Arnold, and now Fred Thompson. There is something innately liberalizing about working in a field in which you take on and drop personas on a daily basis. Not to mention working with a variety of women in explicitly equitable settings.
One quickly sheds large hunks of sexism when interacting professionally with women on a basis of equality; even if it's enforced equality according to Actor's Equity rules. One discovers that not only are women competent, but they can make their own decisions, and insist on doing so. Not only that, but it becomes plain that women think they are about more than reproduction, just as men are (despite the continuing focus of entertainment on that female role).
Any of these reflections would be a shock to many, both in Washington and in the Bible Belt. It's to Thompson's credit that he's willing to leave reproductive choices to those whose lives will be affected by them; rather than criminalizing those choices.
It could be that he's simply more intelligent than Dutch and the Gipper. If so, he's also too intelligent to be very attractive to "base" Republican voters. They want relatively mindless adherence to the party line, not actual considered stands on principle.
Oh yeah, they also want "folksy," which these days is pretty much down to Larry the Cable Guy. Only actors can deliver such a pitifully fake commodity.
Posted by: Dan Mortenson on 11/16/07 at 4:40 PM Respond
ARCHIVE
November 11, 2007 - November 17, 2007
November 4, 2007 - November 10, 2007
October 28, 2007 - November 3, 2007
October 21, 2007 - October 27, 2007
October 14, 2007 - October 20, 2007
October 7, 2007 - October 13, 2007
September 30, 2007 - October 6, 2007
September 23, 2007 - September 29, 2007
September 16, 2007 - September 22, 2007
September 9, 2007 - September 15, 2007
September 2, 2007 - September 8, 2007
August 26, 2007 - September 1, 2007
August 19, 2007 - August 25, 2007
August 12, 2007 - August 18, 2007
August 5, 2007 - August 11, 2007
July 29, 2007 - August 4, 2007
April 22, 2007 - April 28, 2007
April 15, 2007 - April 21, 2007
April 8, 2007 - April 14, 2007
March 25, 2007 - March 31, 2007
March 18, 2007 - March 24, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
Fred Thompson's Surprising Social Moderation (3)
Dan Mortenson wrote:
I'm always surprised to come across an actor who's a "cons...
[more]
Las Vegas Smackdown? Nah, Clinton, Obama and Edwards Play to a Draw (14)
MSM wrote:
[It is far past time to shift the majority of the tax burd...
[more]
Nixon on Tape: Reagan Was "Shallow" and of "Limited Mental Capacity" (16)
Jayne Marasa wrote:
I agree. Reagan just happened to be in office when the USS...
[more]
Bombs Sneak Past Airport Security? Shocking! (2)
State Security wrote:
The State was protecting us on Nyna Leven.
The State was ...
[more]
Stephen Colbert For President (Really! Maybe? Sorta?) (9)
Thomas wrote:
I would like to have Colbert
interview Pete Williams. Talk...
[more]
Ron Paul Refuses to Divest of Donations from Neo-Nazis (36)
ReadSomeHistory wrote:
@ nmc
"anybody care to defend the KKK as a respectable org...
[more]
Edwards Announces "Plants for Hillary" (4)
8apeach wrote:
If you think that's all he's doing, you aren't paying atte...
[more]
No One Wants to Blog for Bush Anymore (3)
GD wrote:
look, I'm a huge dem, hell I was linked here by Mic Check ...
[more]
Barry Bonds Going (Jail)Yard? (3)
Forrest wrote:
It's precisely that he was a great player before the other...
[more]
Elliot Spitzer Drops Plan To Issue Drivers' Licenses To Illegal Immigrants (Boy, I'll Bet Hillary's Pissed) (20)
Forrest wrote:
"But what about a step toward documentation? Accountabili...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33



RECENT ENTRIES
"Sacking" of Washington Mid East Hand Points Up Growing Rift Between Washington Ideology and Israeli Pragmatism
Harry Reid Promises Hearings on Pentagon Puppets
McCain's Surrogates Get Confused
In the Shadow of Mother's Day
At Least One Conservative Says McCain Should Renounce Rev. Parsley
John McCain, No Environmentalist
As Obama Takes Lead in Superdels, Clinton Makes Unlikely Bid for Popular Vote
The Paulites Aren't Done Yet
Starbucks' Slutty Mermaid Making Waves