«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
Obama Touches the Third Rail, Sort Of.
On "Meet the Press" this weekend, Barack Obama struck out at Hillary Clinton over her refusal to commit to raising the cap on payroll taxes to help keep Social Security solvent. Obama's focus on payroll taxes was refreshing after all the recent focus on the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT). The AMT is the 1960s measure designed to catch a handful of super-rich tax cheats that now ensnares a lot of ordinary upper-class people and which Congress has pledged to fix.
Payroll taxes, which fund Social Security and Medicare, only apply to the first $94,200 of a worker's wages. Income from investments and other passive earnings that make up a lot of the super-rich's income aren't subject to payroll taxes at all. That's why Obama was suggesting raising the income cap, a reasonable idea given that the number of people in the upper tax bracket has soared under the Bush administration. John Edwards has also said he'd support such a measure. But Clinton is on the fence.
Which is too bad, because payroll taxes are highly regressive. More than half of wage-earning Americans pay more in payroll taxes than they do in income taxes, and they fall heaviest on people earning less than $40,000 a year, eating up more than 15 percent of a minimum-wage workers paycheck. The AMT, though, only hits people who make more than $100,000 a year. If Obama is serious about taking on payroll taxes, he ought to consider giving them a major overhaul, not just to fix Social Security, but to relieve some of the burden on the working poor.

Comments
What "problem" is Obama trying to solve? Social Security is one of the few government programs that actually works. With that in mind, I see his proposal as a Trojan Horse designed to re-open debate on scrapping Social Security.
Since he's claiming to have solutions to problems that don't exist, why doesn't some enterprising journalist ask him about his proposals to protect Planet Earth from giant asteroids.
If he wants to talk about regressive taxation, he should start by bringing up the total tax burden faced by Americans. Add them all up - payroll, income, sales, excise, property...... and it's easy to see that the only one that isn't regressive is the income tax.
In other words, Obama's a moron.
http://www.tinyrevolution.com/mt/archives/001859.html
Posted by: Bruce F on 11/13/07 at 3:09 PM Respond
ARCHIVE
January 27, 2008 - February 2, 2008
January 20, 2008 - January 26, 2008
January 13, 2008 - January 19, 2008
January 6, 2008 - January 12, 2008
December 30, 2007 - January 5, 2008
December 23, 2007 - December 29, 2007
December 16, 2007 - December 22, 2007
December 9, 2007 - December 15, 2007
December 2, 2007 - December 8, 2007
November 25, 2007 - December 1, 2007
November 18, 2007 - November 24, 2007
November 11, 2007 - November 17, 2007
November 4, 2007 - November 10, 2007
October 28, 2007 - November 3, 2007
October 21, 2007 - October 27, 2007
October 14, 2007 - October 20, 2007
October 7, 2007 - October 13, 2007
September 30, 2007 - October 6, 2007
September 23, 2007 - September 29, 2007
September 16, 2007 - September 22, 2007
September 9, 2007 - September 15, 2007
September 2, 2007 - September 8, 2007
August 26, 2007 - September 1, 2007
August 19, 2007 - August 25, 2007
August 12, 2007 - August 18, 2007
August 5, 2007 - August 11, 2007
July 29, 2007 - August 4, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
Saddam's Interrogator Speaks (2)
Anonymous wrote:
Obviously, the news that Saddam Hussein wanted the world t...
[more]
Thinking About Endorsements: Do They Matter? (2)
Will wrote:
Big endorsements (like Ted Kennedy) matter because it's an...
[more]
Just as Ted Kennedy Endorses Obama, RNC Discovers—Omigod!—TMK Is a Liberal (8)
dj spellchecka wrote:
after eight years of bush and 16 years of republican contr...
[more]
Fred Thompson Exits, Stage Right (7)
rage wrote:
He was still in it? How could they tell?...
[more]
South Carolina's Lasting Impact (36)
Sharon Ash wrote:
Paul Miller: Bullet point one: When Obama was elected to...
[more]
Clinton Smears Obama on Iraq — Again (87)
about politics wrote:
if i was to vote.i would vote for a demacrat.i like hilary...
[more]
GOPers Debate (Nicely) in Florida; Here Are the Whoppers of the Night (34)
capt wrote:
"Nice if our own leaders followed Sun-tzu's plan, huh, cap...
[more]
McCain in NH: Would Be "Fine" To Keep Troops in Iraq for "A Hundred Years" (64)
Peter wrote:
If we elect McCain, we deserve every thing we get. He's a...
[more]
Edwards v. Dellinger: Gossip Over The Next AG (1)
capt wrote:
"despite what Bob Novak says"
Novak is a fabricator and a...
[more]
Obama Wins South Carolina; Plus, Bill's Jesse Jackson Comparison (8)
Gary wrote:
Quit jumping all over race! Perhaps he was implying that y...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


RECENT ENTRIES
Misleading Headline of the Week: This. Is. Obama!
Now on the San Francisco Ballot: The George W. Bush Sewage Plant
AFRICOM: State Dept., USAID Concerned About "Militarization" of Foreign Aid
Messiah Watch: Obama as Neo
Obama Loses One Fundraising Advantage
Part of a Peace Group? Might Want to Take a Look Around...
Air Force Design Divas Request First Class 'Comfort Capsules'
Next Week: The Overseas Obama Extravaganza
An All-American Advertisement