And what of Barry Bonds? Yesterday was likely not a heroic day in the Bonds household— he's on the list, though he's facing perjury for swearing he didn't use—but this dispels the Bonds-as-the-root-of-all-steroid-evil myth. The whole asterik hubbub around his home-run record, how about stars next to some of Roger Clemens' seven Cy Young awards?

And to all those fans who want users punished and who hope this ushers in a new era of the sport, I say uh-uh. You don't want to see baseball without steroids, for the same reason you don't want to stop shopping at Costco. We like to feel like we're getting a bargain for big packages. I don't blame the fans, it's what we've come to expect, the good deal in exchange for accepting the ridiculously high salaries and bulging box-seat prices. We expect nothing less than big time.

Of course, there are those (and I, being a San Francisco Giants fan, swear I loved Barry Bonds as a base-stealing Pirate much more than as a hometown slugger) who would say that if the entire league gets clean we again have an even playing field, that home runs will rocket again, that pitchers will still prove remarkable. Sure, eventually. But my hunch is that Americans just don't want to wait around for that to happen, nor do ballclubs want to risk that adjustment period.

And one last thing to consider: With baseball being raked over the coals as being the dirty, disgraced sport, what could be going through the minds of the other professional league players, managers, coaches and owners? Football? Hello, are we going to really consider that steroids and baseball are the only alluring match? If we really want pure sports we can't pick and choose which ones, can we? I mean football is about brutal contact, brute strength at its finest, so we're going to let the juice slide? I haven't heard calls yet for the NFL two-year investigation. But if we're serious about wanting honest professional sports then it should only be a matter of time.

Yeah, we'll see.