MOTHER JONES BY E-MAIL
MoJo Blog Home

«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»

U.S.'s Dirty Work Behind Pakistani Political Crisis?

bush_musharraf.jpg

The New York Times reports today that Pervez Musharraf is acting quickly to release detainees who were held and interrogated with no paper trail or legal protections to get rid of evidence of the secret program. Detainees have been warned not to talk about their experiences, and in at least one case, an Arab man was released in Gaza, a direly impoverished region surrounded on all sides by Israel.

The Times article reveals that much of the ongoing political struggle in Pakistan stems from conflicts about the detention program. The political conflict began, you may remember, as a power struggle between Musharraf and Iftikar Chaudhry, the chief justice of the Supreme Court—who, in turns out, was attempting to force the dictator to bring the detainees into the court system. Musharraf subsequently removed Chaudhry, and lawyers took to the streets—lawyers who, in some cases, were attempting to represent the disappeared suspects.

One rationale Musharraf gave for imposing emergency rule in November was that the court was releasing suspected terrorists. In fact, it was simply demanding that detainees be charged or freed. You may also recall that Musharraf wasted no time rounding up and jailing human rights workers—who were also quite plausibly advocating for detainees. (The Times' sources are identified as "lawyers and human rights officials.")

A week into his emergency rule, Musharraf reinvigorated amended the 1952 Army Act "to allow civilians to be tried by military tribunals for general offenses. The tribunals are closed to the public and offer no right of appeal," according to the Times. For good measure, the amendment was made retroactive to January 2003, leaving no way to track any criminal charges since then.

To justify the move, a government spokesman said, "Sometimes it becomes difficult to prove a case, but you have reasons that a person poses a threat to humanity and to society."

Pakistan was almost certainly working with the United States in its efforts to interrogate, if not prosecute, the suspected terrorists. One recently released detainee reports that a white, English-speaking interrogator was in the room as his Pakistani captors tortured him.

Although the idea of U.S. officials presiding over the detention and torture of suspected terrorists may not scandalize you anymore, their participation in the detention and torture of ethnic minorities whose only crime is to support regional autonomy ought to. Among the disappeared are thousands of Baluchi and Sindhi nationalists who they have nothing to do with the war on terror.

Leave a Comment »

Posted by Cameron Scott on 12/19/07 at 1:38 PM | E-mail | Print | Digg | de.licio.us | Reddit | Newsvine | Yahoo! MyWeb | StumbleUpon | Netscape | Google |



Comments

NY times and other bleeding heart liberals ought to clarify their own ambiguous position on the grand GWOT.
Most of the past six years NYT has been lamenting that Musharraf needs to "do more" in terror war. It has quoted all kinds of Bush Staffers, Afghans and others. Now it comes out with this sensational disclosure that he actually was doing a lot more to his people than his own laws allowed so he had to go and change those laws in order to continue "doing more"....a pernicious demand from NYT. I mean give the poor guy a break. Does anyone on NYT ed. board have any idea what are the prevalent conditions in Indo-Oxiana heartlands? Do they even know where that is?

Posted by: Marc on 12/19/07 at 3:57 PM  Respond

U.S has been always involved in Pakistani politics to keep a grip on an ally, which it has cared only for when in need.

U.S policies had been destructive for itself and Pak. In 1980's after Soviet Union collapsed and Pak was left with millions of refugees, it changed a peace ful country into a terror bazar. United States should respect Pakistan for its role as an ally and as a friend. Some ignorant politicians in U.S talk about taking on Pak to remove nukes or enter to kill terroists, are counter productive.

Pakistani's are better in many ways than countries around them, making them a foe will be simply an error United States will regret. United States should earn respect of Pakistani's by giving them what it has denied in a long time a due recognition and respect.

Posted by: Waseem on 12/19/07 at 6:56 PM  Respond

The laws used by Musharraf to justify his dictatorial powers have been emulated by the Bush-Cheney regime; with the USAPATRIOT, Military Commissions and Protect America Acts, Congress authorized Bush's arrogation of powers. Like Musharraf, Bush has manipulated the Supreme Court by packing it with two more extremists. The RATS (Roberts, Alito, Thomas and Scalia) justices need only one swing vote, probably from Kennedy, to stymie any attempt to rein in the "unitary executive." Bush's assertion that Musharraf "believes in democracy" reflects their similar conceptions of governance.

Posted by: AlexLawyer on 12/19/07 at 8:06 PM  Respond

The Zionists are behind all of this. The Jews will not stop at anything to protect the land that they stole from the Muslims.

Posted by: Tarik Aziz on 12/21/07 at 4:45 PM  Respond

Musharaf says "Paksitan First" so he is ensuring the death of common Pakistanis "First" under Bush's secret plan. This will breakdown law and order to create wide spread CHAOS. Bush will then dispose off the Islamic Nukes and Musharaf for good as was done with Mr. Bhutto and Gen Zia etc. Murder of innocent people and destroying the lives of their families will be avenged by God Almighty. Amen. History will then declare Musharaf as the greatest traitor of the Muslim World.

Posted by: Mala Buzair on 12/27/07 at 7:23 AM  Respond

Post a comment





 

RECENT COMMENTS

U.S.'s Dirty Work Behind Pakistani Political Crisis? (5)
Mala Buzair wrote: Musharaf says "Paksitan First" so he is ensuring the death... [more]

Rotenberg Center Blasted By Gov. Eliot Spitzer and Media After A Prankster Gets Employees to "Accidentally" Shock Kids 100 Times: Will The "School of Shock" Finally Be Closed Down? (22)
Johan V. Tress wrote: Why is this story NOT on CNN??? How about Anderson 360???... [more]

Coming Soon to Texas: A Master's Degree in Creation Science (62)
from oldooooldeurope wrote: sic transit gloria mundi..... [more]

Santa's Reindeer: Not as Sprightly as They Used to Be (3)
capt wrote: Note to MoJo webmasters. Limit URL's in comments to one ... [more]

Why Not Smoke 'Em Since you Got 'Em?: The "Boys of Satire" Returning to Work Much, Much Too Soon (7)
capt wrote: "There is no need, or even point, to collective bargaining... [more]

Why the Dems Won't Fix Health Care (2)
DaveD wrote: Cheney's office is correct; it is outrageous. It's outrage... [more]

Florida Appeals Court Rules Against Girl Based On Fantasized Future Events (38)
tommy wrote: This more like a question to who can point me it the right... [more]

Huckabee: Shhhh, It's Between God and Me (3)
Stephen Cobb wrote: Where Huckabee sits on global warming I don't know, but th... [more]

Hillary, Romney Up in Iowa, We Think (1)
capt wrote: "Bottom line here is that polls are polls, and while they ... [more]

Missing a Testicle? Say Goodbye to That Tour in Iraq You Were Hoping For (12)
Dorey wrote: Ah yes - genetic screening. Sounds familiar. There w... [more]

XML RSS Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.33

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com

















bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN


This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2007 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS