«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
Edwards and Obama Draw Contrasts on Health Care Reform
In my most recent article on John Edwards, I wondered if Edwards' strident anti-corporate message, courageous and admirable as it may be, would turn off voters in the general election.
Yesterday, Jonathan Alter of Newsweek answered with an emphatic yes.
How many 20th Century American presidents have been elected on a populist platform? That would be zero... millions of Americans still work for corporations or aspire to do so and bashing them wholesale is a loser politically. It works sometimes in Democratic primaries with a heavy labor vote (though not for Dick Gephardt). But not in general elections. The last two Democrats elected president—Jimmy Carter in 1976 and Bill Clinton in 1992—also campaigned during recessions. Both were smart enough to reject populism in favor of a responsive but upbeat message.
Alter also discusses the differences Obama and Edwards have on health care. Obama says that he will initiate health care reform by sitting down at a big table with patients' advocates, health care economists, insurance companies, and other interested parties. Everyone would have the right to state their priorities, but the meeting would be CSPAN and the American people would know who is motivated by greed, who is negotiating in bad faith, and who is working against the interests of everyday Americans. Alter writes, "having triumphed over the drug and insurance companies in the court of public opinion, the legislative victories will follow."
Edwards says it is "a fantasy" to expect insurance companies and drug companies to negotiate their power away at a table such as Obama's. The only real option, Edwards says, is to exclude these corporate interests from the discussion and "take" their power away. How he plans on doing that is never quite articulated.
It's worth pointing out that Edwards and Obama have managed to have this debate without going negative. The debate over which approach to health care reform is less realistic continues, but gently...
Leave a Comment »
Posted by Jonathan Stein on 12/20/07 at 8:19 AM | E-mail | Print | Digg | de.licio.us | Reddit | Newsvine | Yahoo! MyWeb | StumbleUpon | Netscape | Google |
Comments
Nice mischaracterizations. Edwards is not and does not claim to be anti-corporate. He is, rather, against corporate malfeasance in rigging the system by using our government as a means for entrenchment and enrichment to the detriment of average citizens.
If corporations behaved ethically we wouldn't be having this discussion. And Obama is hopelessly naive to think that he can sit down with these powerful interests and convince them to give their power away. That is indeed fantasy, CSPAN or not.
Posted by: DJS on 12/20/07 at 12:11 PM Respond
"To call Obama 'anti-change,' as Paul Krugman does, is anti-common sense. Leadership requires a mixture of confrontation and compromise, with room for the losers to save face. 'They have to feel the heat to see the light,' LBJ liked to say. That heat is best applied up close. In public. Across the big table." http://www.newsweek.com/id/80882/page/1
Posted by: a naughty moose on 12/20/07 at 12:17 PM Respond
"How many 20th Century American presidents have been elected on a populist platform? That would be zero."
Wait, what? That's not true at all. TR in 1904, FDR in 1936, and Truman in 1948 won on what are generally considered populist platforms. (Those were all re-election campaigns, though, unlike this one.)
More importantly, isn't the first half of this post the kind of "electability" stuff that you just criticized a couple days ago?
Posted by: Dan on 12/20/07 at 9:11 PM Respond
We can't simply exclude the insurance companies from the discussion, as Edwards suggests. But merely televising the debate--which is going to be arcane even to most CSPAN viewers--will only lend itself to grandstanding, not solutions. Instead, we need to put forth real, workable models, allow the players to have their input, and then submit the best model to a vote, after substantial public education about the issues. That's what's going to happen in California, and the nation should follow suit.
Posted by: Ken Terry on 12/21/07 at 6:37 AM Respond
ARCHIVE
December 16, 2007 - December 22, 2007
December 9, 2007 - December 15, 2007
December 2, 2007 - December 8, 2007
November 25, 2007 - December 1, 2007
November 18, 2007 - November 24, 2007
November 11, 2007 - November 17, 2007
November 4, 2007 - November 10, 2007
October 28, 2007 - November 3, 2007
October 21, 2007 - October 27, 2007
October 14, 2007 - October 20, 2007
October 7, 2007 - October 13, 2007
September 30, 2007 - October 6, 2007
September 23, 2007 - September 29, 2007
September 16, 2007 - September 22, 2007
September 9, 2007 - September 15, 2007
September 2, 2007 - September 8, 2007
August 26, 2007 - September 1, 2007
August 19, 2007 - August 25, 2007
August 12, 2007 - August 18, 2007
August 5, 2007 - August 11, 2007
July 29, 2007 - August 4, 2007
April 22, 2007 - April 28, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
Edwards and Obama Draw Contrasts on Health Care Reform (4)
Ken Terry wrote:
We can't simply exclude the insurance companies from the d...
[more]
Huckabee: The Search for a Sobriquet (13)
capt wrote:
Gawd-dawg
***
Except dyslectic atheists’ believe there ...
[more]
Coming Soon to Texas: A Master's Degree in Creation Science (5)
ZaphodBebblebrox wrote:
I'm "from" Texas. Left for college and never went back. No...
[more]
Crazy As They Need To Be: Circumcised Women Who Support The Practice (69)
sjp wrote:
While this author claims that female circumcision is unspe...
[more]
Al-Qaeda's Number 2 Answers Journalists (1)
Colin wrote:
To borrow a line from "Charlie Wilson's War"
"Excuse me, ...
[more]
Does Huckabee Believe Angels Intervene in Hunting Contests? (38)
Huckmaniac wrote:
Probably Lee Harvey Oswalds' same line of thought. Man it ...
[more]
The Edwards Love-Child Non-Story... So Far (3)
Pope wrote:
It is also reported that the Andrew Young who is an offici...
[more]
Al Sharpton Under Investigation. Again (2)
dave wrote:
i was wondering why i didn't see "al sharpton's face" on t...
[more]
Mitt Romney's Father Never Marched with Martin Luther King Jr. (3)
EvilPoet wrote:
“We Believe in Being Honest”
http://www.lds.org/ldsorg/v/i...
[more]
Banning Gay Adoption Would Cost Foster Care System $130 Million (11)
Irritated In Wisconsin wrote:
I think that gay and lesbians should boycott doing foster ...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33



RECENT ENTRIES
McCain & Co. Find New Ways to Circumvent Campaign Finance Laws McCain Wrote
Will Trouble in Afghanistan Become a Tough Campaign Issue for McCain?
MoJo Convo: Iran Panic? A Follow Up Question for the Experts
Blogger Brian Beutler Shot, Expected to Make Full Recovery
Video: DNC Hammers McCain on Economic Double Talk
McCain Denies Ever Saying He Lacks Expertise on Economy
Report: Interrogation Instructors at Gitmo Taught Communist Tactics from 1950s
One More Clinton Campaign Post-Mortem: No Hierarchy, No Trust, No Comity
How to Think about Immunity