MOTHER JONES BY E-MAIL
MoJo Blog Home

«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»

The Brother From Another Planet: Good, and Bad, Reasons why Blacks Aren't in Lock Step with Obama

I never cease to be amazed at how amazing it seems that blacks aren't in automatic, unthinking, en masse lockstep with Barack Obama. I did a BBC interview just after Obama's announcement from Springfield and nothing I said could penetrate that white woman's disgusted annoyance with me for pointing out that even black candidates have to earn black votes. I was only there to prove how baffling, and therefore ignoreable, Negroes are; she never heard a word I said. It was incomprehensible to her that we could at once do carthweels in the streets over him and keep our minds open about voting for him. Guess it's not just Asians who are inscrutable; it's all Others when they don't queue up in accordance with whites' lazy predictions about us.

This annoyance and assumption of black connivance (our coolness toward Obama can't possibly be defensible) against a shiny, clean black guy like Obama is particularly worrisome when it comes from other blacks. Most often, it's the same blacks who rail most vocally against white denial of black complexity, yet they know very well that you can't talk to any group of black folks without hearing a plethora of contradictory opinions (gee, just like 'real' people). We range from Bill Cosby to Michael Eric Dyson, Sec. Rice to Marian Wright Edelman. If we vote for any black just because they're black, we get dogged. If we vet all comers with equal scrutiny we're seen as, I dunno, stupid. Self-destructive. No need to pay us any mind; let the grown ups make the decisions.

The truth is that nobody weighs their vote as carefully as blacks, especially older blacks, and we've been voting for non-blacks a long time. You see, we want to see blacks get their due but, more than anything else, we get that we're minorities, often despised minorities, and that we'll only rarely be represented by folks who look like us. We wrote the book on making due and getting done what we can get done, symbolism aside. Without knowing more, black opposition to Obama is as worthy as black support of him regardless of what the black Politburo says.

Still, William Jelani Cobb, writing in The Washington Post, offers one of the few worthy versions of this argument re the civil rights establishment's ambivalence and hostility to Obama:

That's because, positioned as he is between the black boomers and the hip-hop generation, Obama is indebted, but not beholden, to the civil rights gerontocracy. A successful Obama candidacy would simultaneously represent a huge leap forward for black America and the death knell for the reign of the civil rights-era leadership -- or at least the illusion of their influence.

Cobb is still ignoring the obvious too much, I think, as to the role of black sagacity in weighing Obama, but his argument is among the most nuanced. I'm on record as highly critical of the Generation That Won't Go Away (Sharpton, Jackson, et al), much as I honor their role in my freedom. We'd still be in the back of the bus if I'd had to face Bull Connor. Still, I think they're getting something of a bum rap on Obama. And of course, Clinton shot herself in the foot with the dissing of MLK. Oh my, how the truth slipped out there. All you Negroes marchin' was fine, but it took white folks to seal the deal. Andrew Young et. al. will be thanking her for a long time for that one. And South Carolina's blacks have been given a little something to chew on while their hands are poised over the 'Clinton' button.

Leave a Comment »

Posted by Debra Dickerson on 01/14/08 at 1:39 PM | E-mail | Print | Digg | de.licio.us | Reddit | Newsvine | Yahoo! MyWeb | StumbleUpon | Netscape | Google |



Comments

The civil rights movement had MLK and many other leaders that had to march in the streets to convince the political leaders to enact civil rights legislation.

The political act was cowardly by comparison. I think the politicians prove again how full of themselves they really are.

Posted by: capt on 01/14/08 at 2:55 PM  Respond

Maybe because all blacks are not the same? I mean, why is everyone, regardless of race not in lock step with Obama? Frankly I think the fact that this is not the case proves that racism is much less a problem today.

Posted by: Rissoto 47 on 01/14/08 at 3:55 PM  Respond

William Jefferson and my own Henry Cuellar prove that blacks and hispanics still cast a race-biased vote. One got caught with his hand in the cookie jar and the other has a horrible voting record, both had worthy opponents, and both were re-elected. No reasonable explanation except color, surname, and voter ignorance.
There'll always be some who vote differently but the statistics doesn’t lie. Whites do the same thing and, with a few anomalies, most districts are probably color-matched.

Posted by: Riverman on 01/14/08 at 5:30 PM  Respond

Why on Earth should we assume that blacks should automatically vote for blacks, women for women, etc.? Clearly most white Democrats are far more attuned to the interests of most African Americans than Condoleezza Rice or Clarence Thomas.

Obama would make a major strategic error if he ran as a "black candidate" rather than as a candidate who happens to be black. His positions on the major issues are generally congenial to the African American community as a whole while being nonthreatening to most non-racist whites. He's smart not to touch the hot buttons and doom his candidacy.

Posted by: AlexLawyer on 01/14/08 at 6:26 PM  Respond

"The truth is that nobody weighs their vote as carefully as blacks," This is a racist statement. It is exclusive, it is not inclusive and it is divisive. If inflames racism and the great divide that we see today.

Posted by: Josh on 01/14/08 at 8:09 PM  Respond

yoowhoo!Is anybody out there? Has everyone forgotten that Barack Obama's mother is a caucasian. If the mother is caucasian then the child is caucasian. Where have you people been?

Posted by: Dianne on 01/14/08 at 9:17 PM  Respond

The comment from the Clinton camp that diminished the efforts of the Civil Rights activists in favor of the political leadershisp of the time may, in itself, be fatal to Hilary Clinton's chances in South Carolina at the very least.

Though I am not entirely sold on Obama, I do like him and the fact that we are both black does not hurt him in my eyes. Neverheless, I must admit that the positions of Kucinich and Edwards appeal to me more than either Clinton or Obama. Unfortunately, Kucinich cannot get enough people to take him seriously. Perhaps people resent Edwards success as a defense lawyer and resent their identification with the 2nd America that will never get rich.

Posted by: George Seals on 01/15/08 at 2:53 AM  Respond

The comment from the Clinton camp that diminished the efforts of the Civil Rights activists in favor of the political leadershisp of the time may, in itself, be fatal to Hilary Clinton's chances in South Carolina at the very least.

Though I am not entirely sold on Obama, I do like him and the fact that we are both black does not hurt him in my eyes. Neverheless, I must admit that the positions of Kucinich and Edwards appeal to me more than either Clinton or Obama. Unfortunately, Kucinich cannot get enough people to take him seriously. Perhaps people resent Edwards success as a defense lawyer and resent their identification with the 2nd America that will never get rich.

Posted by: George Seals on 01/15/08 at 2:54 AM  Respond

so you dont find it at all ironic that you make a blanket statement about all whites making blanket statements about blacks? nice touch with the 'lazy' part.

"The truth is that nobody weighs their vote as carefully as blacks"- according to whom?

According to the US Census:
In 2004, turnout rates for citizens were 67 percent for non-Hispanic whites, 60 percent for blacks

just sayin.

Anyway, I agree with what you say. But trying to get a point about being pigeon-holed as a race, by making racist comments about another is disingenuous (pardon my spelling! we hispanics are muy mal at the ingles!)

Posted by: yubi on 01/15/08 at 8:38 AM  Respond

Any comment I make would only echo George Seals' comment above - though I'll add that it's strange to see this "story" framed under two different headlines on the same site. We get it, you're trying to drive home a point here, and you've probably succeeded in convincing some blacks not to vote for Obama...congratulations?

Posted by: nic on 01/15/08 at 9:17 AM  Respond

If Obama is not the Democratic Party candidate, we will stay home and teach the Democratic Party a lesson.

Posted by: Jamahl on 01/15/08 at 10:08 AM  Respond

Post a comment





 

RECENT COMMENTS

Clinton Smears Obama on Iraq — Again (71)
Re: Stella wrote: It's a smear, not a reality check, when one candidate purp... [more]

Clinton Supporter Who Slammed Obama on Race, Drugs Has Not-So-Progressive History (16)
Kapman wrote: Bob Johson should read the speech given by William Lynch t... [more]

The Reverse Bradley? Might Blacks Lie To Pollsters? If so, Why? (1)
capt wrote: "The Reverse Bradley? Might Blacks Lie To Pollsters? If so... [more]

The Wrath of Hillary: Finally, She Really Fires Away at Obama (85)
capt wrote: "Everyone should know by now that our Republic is dead." ... [more]

Clinton Faces Trouble in South Carolina for MLK Remarks (20)
BLT wrote: Hillary's statement, was probably not intentionally racist... [more]

New Clinton Surrogate Raises Obama's Drug Use (15)
Bill VanLoo MSc(fp) wrote: Please read the Infidel and see how pervasive Muslims are ... [more]

Court Denies FTC Injunction Against Whole Foods Merger (1)
Maureen wrote: The following may draw attention to the clever and twisted... [more]

Be Careful, Kids — Monkey Business Can Start Wars (6)
Ira C. wrote: Iran hates Israel for no good reason. Iran wants to get nu... [more]

The Brother From Another Planet: Good, and Bad, Reasons why Blacks Aren't in Lock Step with Obama (11)
Jamahl wrote: If Obama is not the Democratic Party candidate, we will st... [more]

Experience This! Should Senator Clinton Join Senator Obama at the Kids' Table? (3)
nic wrote: Monica will be eligible to run for President in 2012. She... [more]

XML RSS Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.33

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com

















bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN


This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2007 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS