«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
MEMO FROM STARR VALLEY, NEVADA
It’s mid-morning, and Republicans are caucusing all over Nevada. They’ve been doing so since 9am.
In Starr Valley, halfway between Elko and the wild-west town of Wells, in an epic snow covered landscape of ranches and soaring mountains, 43 Republicans are caucusing in the Starr Valley Progressive Club. It’s a huge turnout for a region this remote. Many of the caucus-goers have driven scores of miles to the old wooden building, with a small Mitt Romney sign outside and a herd of wooly cattle across the icy street to cast their votes.
The people here, a goodly number of them Mormons, have a keen sense of their region’s history. Many of their grandparents and great grandparents homesteaded the region in the nineteenth century, and stories of epic cattle drives “before the railroads” provide fodder for familial lore. Most of the men and women here live in the same houses their ancestors built and ranch the land as they did.
“My family homesteaded this area right about the turn of the century,” says Sheriff Dale Lotspeich, who is in charge of signing in the voters from his precinct. “My parents and I still live in the family homestead – 300 acres. We run about a dozen head of cattle and fifty head of sheep. People typically here are against higher taxes, are very self-sufficient, don’t believe in big government. We’re very down to earth. One of the big things we care about is the right to bear arms. Family values are very strong.”
Unlike the Democrats, who have a traditional form-and-reform caucus process in Nevada, with candidate supporters continually coalescing into new groups until “viability” has been reached for candidates, the Republicans have a simple ballot process. As the suns burns off the morning fog over the wilderness outside, they talk about party policies for the first half of the meeting, from abortion to tax cuts, from the sanctity of marriage to gun control, and then move on to the real business at hand – choosing the man they want to be their presidential candidate.
They discuss the merits and flaws of each candidate for half an hour, place their ballots in an envelope and wait for volunteers to count the votes.
Not surprisingly, since Romney’s the only Republican candidate to really woo Nevadans, and, in addition, since eastern Nevada has a large Mormon presence, two thirds of the caucus-goers choose Romney.
I’ve no idea whether Starr Valley will be representative of the rest of the state, in particular Las Vegas – though the last polls released did show Romney had a sizeable lead statewide and the Associated Press is already calling the race for Romney. Huckabee is seen as being honest and somewhat charismatic here, but voters seem to have been turned off by his lack of knowledge about the state. Thompson’s campaign has been so lackluster, few in rural Nevada support him even though they generally agree with his conservative positions. McCain curries favor for being a westerner; but, despite his win in New Hampshire, he doesn’t seem to have gotten enough traction here. People think he’s too liberal, too soft on push-button conservative social and economic issues they care about. Ron Paul – they like him, many of them an awful lot, but they’re pretty certain he’s not electable. As for Giuliani… big city, east coast; need we say more?
We’ll know more in a few hours. Right now, I’m off to the Democratic caucus in the tiny city of Wells.
-- Sasha Abramsky.
Leave a Comment »
Posted by Mother Jones on 01/19/08 at 10:51 AM | E-mail | Print | Digg | de.licio.us | Reddit | Newsvine | Yahoo! MyWeb | StumbleUpon | Netscape | Google |
Comments
Without a doubt, Huckabee is the most dishonest campaigner in either party. All the dirty tricks and lies that surrounded his campaigns in Arkansas have surfaced again in IA and SC.
Huckabee''s only honest statement so far is that he "must have done something right" to be re-elected twice in a Democratic state. The "something right" that he did was running his office like a Democrat and his campaigns like a Clinton.
Posted by: Allan Stewart on 01/19/08 at 11:15 AM Respond
Ron Paul is only not electable if the voters make him so.
If these people voted with their conscience and the future of this country in mind, there would be no doubt Paul would be our President.
This election is not a follow the leader contest. You want to vote for a winner? Only you can make him that winner.
Posted by: Garrett Gebhardt on 01/19/08 at 12:10 PM Respond
"Get all the fools on your side and you can be elected to anything."
~ Frank Dane
Posted by: capt on 01/19/08 at 12:41 PM Respond
ARCHIVE
January 13, 2008 - January 19, 2008
January 6, 2008 - January 12, 2008
December 30, 2007 - January 5, 2008
December 23, 2007 - December 29, 2007
December 16, 2007 - December 22, 2007
December 9, 2007 - December 15, 2007
December 2, 2007 - December 8, 2007
November 25, 2007 - December 1, 2007
November 18, 2007 - November 24, 2007
November 11, 2007 - November 17, 2007
November 4, 2007 - November 10, 2007
October 28, 2007 - November 3, 2007
October 21, 2007 - October 27, 2007
October 14, 2007 - October 20, 2007
October 7, 2007 - October 13, 2007
September 30, 2007 - October 6, 2007
September 23, 2007 - September 29, 2007
September 16, 2007 - September 22, 2007
September 9, 2007 - September 15, 2007
September 2, 2007 - September 8, 2007
August 26, 2007 - September 1, 2007
August 19, 2007 - August 25, 2007
August 12, 2007 - August 18, 2007
August 5, 2007 - August 11, 2007
July 29, 2007 - August 4, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
MEMO FROM STARR VALLEY, NEVADA (3)
capt wrote:
"Get all the fools on your side and you can be elected to ...
[more]
Eugene Debs, Meet Bobby Kennedy (22)
Nick Rackham wrote:
I canvassed for Edwards 4 years ago. I like him a lot, but...
[more]
A Problem for Barack Obama (42)
Robert Labelle wrote:
Are you kidding me? The basic premise of this article is w...
[more]
White House: What Missing Emails? (15)
iggy wrote:
We have no way of knowing that any emails are missing, is ...
[more]
5 Questions On Israel For The Next Debate (7)
ruforreal wrote:
Would it not be better to give detroit to the palestinians...
[more]
Shrub's Hot Air Economic Balloon (3)
Officer Thomas A. Porter D.P.O. wrote:
Emperor Bush and his so called 'Economic Stimulus Plan' re...
[more]
Mitt Romney's Lobbyist Connections (14)
Re-Al wrote:
Hey Wagner, get your grammar correct, man. It's, "Dude!!! ...
[more]
The Debate Over Virtual Schools (6)
Erica wrote:
My children attend the public virtual school in Wi that co...
[more]
Is Ron Paul a Bigot? (81)
capt wrote:
"accepted Ron Paul's self-characterization instead of appl...
[more]
Reporter Calls Romney On Lie in Mid-Sentence (2)
Jeff wrote:
Finally, a mainstream reporter with integrity and a pair ...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33



RECENT ENTRIES
Adelson Questioned by Israeli Detectives in Connection to Olmert Corruption Probe
McCain Confuses Voters (and Himself?) on Spending Cuts
Brent Scowcroft on the Cuba Embargo: "It Doesn't Do Anything"
Which Dictators Are Too Awful?
Obama Goes General
Clinton Campaign Keeps On Pushing Bogus Rationale
More on McCain's Climate Change Speech Today
China Outlaws Pringles and Fanta
The Weird McCain-Dictator Connection