Ron Paul beat Rudy Guiliani (a media favorite) in the Iowa, Michigan, Nevada and South Carolina primaries. Considering there has been almost a total media blackout of the Paul campaign yet he continues to beat Guiliani (and several other of the Republican 'frontrunners'), that has to be a sign of either how weak Rudy is, or how strong Paul's message is.

Rudy has earned exactly what he is getting.

The "top tier" GOP candidates are not much better.

We obviously have 5 corporations telling us who we want - maybe for better profit we could get one major private equity firm like Carlyle Group to buy all five so we can set aside any pretense?

Rudy will live to regret this strategy. It might have made sense around 20 years ago, but in the information age, if you're not being talked about, you aren't going to have a chance. McCain, Romney, and the other candidates are being covered by the media because they competed in the other states. Rudy waiting so long was a bad move.

Also, I love the poetic justice of Paul beating Rudy in the first states. I'll never forget his treatment of Paul in one of the debates, where Paul was critiquing our foreign policy and Rudy was being a bully, demanding that he "take it back".

"Also, I love the poetic justice of Paul beating Rudy in the first states."

Me too.

I am not a Ron Paul supporter but it was poetic justice without a doubt.

It makes perfect sense that he isn't doing well in New York, around these parts we all know first hand what a prick he is.