«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
NYT Dumps on Giuliani in McCain Endorsement
Today, the New York Times endorsed Hillary Clinton and John McCain. They most certainly did not endorse Rudy Giuliani. From the McCain endorsement:
The real Mr. Giuliani, whom many New Yorkers came to know and mistrust, is a narrow, obsessively secretive, vindictive man who saw no need to limit police power. Racial polarization was as much a legacy of his tenure as the rebirth of Times Square.
Mr. Giuliani’s arrogance and bad judgment are breathtaking. When he claims fiscal prudence, we remember how he ran through surpluses without a thought to the inevitable downturn and bequeathed huge deficits to his successor. He fired Police Commissioner William Bratton, the architect of the drop in crime, because he couldn’t share the limelight. He later gave the job to Bernard Kerik, who has now been indicted on fraud and corruption charges.
The Rudolph Giuliani of 2008 first shamelessly turned the horror of 9/11 into a lucrative business, with a secret client list, then exploited his city’s and the country’s nightmare to promote his presidential campaign.
But really, are Republicans going to care about an endorsement that begins, "We have strong disagreements with all the Republicans running for president" and goes on to support a guy because he "is the only Republican who promises to end the George Bush style of governing"? Liberals love McCain! Time for a Michelle Malkin blog post!
(H/T Wonkette)
Update after the jump.
Looks like McCain is taking fire from the other Republican candidates for getting the endorsement of the liberal NYT. McCain's response:
"In the case of the (former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt) Romney campaign, which I understand is the one that is making most of it, in all due respect, I got the endorsement of both of his hometown newspapers. The Boston Globe, which is known to be liberal, and the Boston Herald, which is very conservative. We got the endorsement of all the people who know him best, in both New Hampshire and Massachusetts. I appreciate anyone’s endorsement."
Ouch.

Comments
Who in God's name is actually paying attention to Rudy Giuliani?! Anyone?! I've asked my co-workers if they even KNOW ANYONE who wants him to continue his political career, and they looked at me as if I were crazy, or asking a trick question.
Posted by: Daniel on 01/25/08 at 11:35 AM Respond
ARCHIVE
January 20, 2008 - January 26, 2008
January 13, 2008 - January 19, 2008
January 6, 2008 - January 12, 2008
December 30, 2007 - January 5, 2008
December 23, 2007 - December 29, 2007
December 16, 2007 - December 22, 2007
December 9, 2007 - December 15, 2007
December 2, 2007 - December 8, 2007
November 25, 2007 - December 1, 2007
November 18, 2007 - November 24, 2007
November 11, 2007 - November 17, 2007
November 4, 2007 - November 10, 2007
October 28, 2007 - November 3, 2007
October 21, 2007 - October 27, 2007
October 14, 2007 - October 20, 2007
October 7, 2007 - October 13, 2007
September 30, 2007 - October 6, 2007
September 23, 2007 - September 29, 2007
September 16, 2007 - September 22, 2007
September 9, 2007 - September 15, 2007
September 2, 2007 - September 8, 2007
August 26, 2007 - September 1, 2007
August 19, 2007 - August 25, 2007
August 12, 2007 - August 18, 2007
August 5, 2007 - August 11, 2007
July 29, 2007 - August 4, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
"The Man's" Morse Code and the Continuing Blight of White Racism (50)
Bobby Decker wrote:
BY THE TIME DR. FRANKENROVES
FINISHD WITH OBAMA........
51...
[more]
Fred Thompson Exits, Stage Right (6)
The Conservative Deflator wrote:
Thompson is about as qualified to be president as Pee Wee ...
[more]
GOPers Debate (Nicely) in Florida; Here Are the Whoppers of the Night (19)
Timmy Tweed wrote:
This criminal president has proven that Republicans are fi...
[more]
"Present" but Unaccountable: Senator Obama's Illinois Voting Record (10)
thomas j gildea wrote:
I think Obama is not experienced enough to be President al...
[more]
Blinded by McCain, Michelle Malkin Misreads MoJo (3)
Vicki Hampton wrote:
Can you even make yourself believe this crap? Because anyo...
[more]
The Dems Debate in South Carolina: Ugh (19)
joy s wrote:
Talk is cheap. And there’s a handshaking, backslapping war...
[more]
Saddam Gambled And Lost, Says FBI Agent (3)
Mr. Forward wrote:
No Kenrev, I meant what I wrote. Saddam is the vicious thu...
[more]
Parsing the Compromise Stimulus Deal (2)
evought wrote:
How exactly does dramatically increasing (doubling?) our n...
[more]
Maybe All the Campaigners Should Learn B. Clinton's Art of Napping (4)
michael Salling wrote:
MATT -- for more go to my blog -- www.teachlaw.blogspot.co...
[more]
Details Emerge About Padilla's Treatment in Confinement (5)
Francis Jens Erickson wrote:
And what about all the time Mr. Padilla was in custody bef...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


RECENT ENTRIES
McCain & Co. Find New Ways to Circumvent Campaign Finance Laws McCain Wrote
Will Trouble in Afghanistan Become a Tough Campaign Issue for McCain?
MoJo Convo: Iran Panic? A Follow Up Question for the Experts
Blogger Brian Beutler Shot, Expected to Make Full Recovery
Video: DNC Hammers McCain on Economic Double Talk
McCain Denies Ever Saying He Lacks Expertise on Economy
Report: Interrogation Instructors at Gitmo Taught Communist Tactics from 1950s
One More Clinton Campaign Post-Mortem: No Hierarchy, No Trust, No Comity
How to Think about Immunity