«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
Thinking About Endorsements: Do They Matter?
David discusses Obama's endorsement from Teddy Kennedy below; it will be valuable to BHO if Kennedy can campaign effectively amongst older voters, Latinos, and labor. Those are three constituencies in which Kennedy has some real juice, and Obama trails Clinton. Also, it gives Obama some old-guard cache.
But color me dubious. I'm just not sure endorsements matter. Imagine the thought process that would be necessary: "Well, I've seen these candidates in debates, on the late night talk shows, on the front page of my newspaper, on the internet, in their ads, on cable TV—I've seen these candidates everywhere in the last few months and have all the information I could possibly need to make a decision. But I'll just do what Teddy Kennedy says." Really? In this supersaturated news environment?
I may be wrong. There may be a number of what political experts call "low-information voters" who use things like endorsements as shortcuts. And perhaps there is a generation of Americans whose allegiance to the Kennedy brothers is so strong that an endorsement matters. I'll concede that—but does anyone care who Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI, if you were wondering) supports?
While we're on the topic, here is how Clinton's and Obama's Senate endorsements break down:
Clinton: Robert Menendez (NJ), Diane Feinstein (CA), Evan Bayh (IN), Debbie Stabenow (MI), Maria Cantwell (WA), Barbara Mikulski (MD), Sheldon Whitehouse (RI), Bill Nelson (FL), Chuck Schumer (NY), Daniel Inouye (HI), and Mark Pryor (AR).
Obama: Claire McCaskill (MO), Patrick Leahy (VT), Dick Durbin (IL), John Kerry (MA), Ben Nelson (NE), Tim Johnson (SD), Kent Conrad (ND), and Ted Kennedy (MA).
Here's how the Kennedy family endorsements play out:
Clinton: Kathleen Kennedy Townsend (RFK's daughter), Bobby Kennedy Jr. (RFK's son), and Kerry Kennedy (RFK's daughter).
Obama: Ted Kennedy, Patrick Kennedy (Ted's son), and Caroline Kennedy (JFK's daughter).
Also, Magic Johnson supports Hillary while Charles Barkley and Toni Morrison support Barack. Just so you know.
Update: Most people don't know this, but MLK III wrote a glowing letter to John Edwards recently. It falls short of a direct endorsement, but it signals King's support of JE's candidacy pretty strongly.

Comments
" I'm just not sure endorsements matter."
I think you're right.
How much "old guard cache" does the agent of change want?
BHO has to walk a fine line.
Most younger folks have no idea who most endorsers are (Kennedy being an exception) so they only react to the dynamic.
Posted by: capt on 01/28/08 at 9:01 AM Respond
Big endorsements (like Ted Kennedy) matter because it's another news cycle where media says "_______ fat cat is throwing his/her support behind candidate ___."
Let's say an undecided Kennedy democrat saw Ted supporting Obama, it may inquire Kennedy democrat to learn why.
No - they aren't the end-all-be-all, but they do matter. Look at the news explosion that is the Teddy endorsement. Imagine what Al Gore's endorsement is going to do.
Posted by: Will on 01/28/08 at 10:42 AM Respond
Endorsements mattered this morning when Obama's name was able to run in the media in bigger letters next to Kennedy's than next to Rezko's:
http://americansineuropeforronpaul.blogspot.com/2008/01/this-mornings-news.html
Also, it's a long held concept in marketing. You sell
product by
1. Making it look popular
2. Making it look like popular people like it.
If someone I respect endorses someone, surely it matters.
Posted by: Allan on 01/28/08 at 12:09 PM Respond
I think endorsements may influence some people who are into celebrities, but as far as Senator Kennedy's endorsement, he has too many skeletons in his own closet to be an asset...way too many. Hillary should be grateful and Obama should run the other way. I can't imagine being influenced by such an endorsement.
Posted by: silverlucie on 01/28/08 at 1:17 PM Respond
I was seventeen when JFK was assassinated, and 24 when Robert was gunned down.
They were both inspiring leaders. As I remember, they were able to interject ALTRUISM into the concept of Patriotism.
It felt good to an American and the future seemed bright with promise.
I felt that Obama evoked my memories of the Kennedys the first time I heard him speak.
The Kennedys wealth and status seemed to be directed to public service, rather than greed and enrichment of the few at the expense of the many.
The endorsement does reinforce my intention to vote for Obama.
Posted by: MaryMomgret on 01/28/08 at 1:17 PM Respond
I was seventeen when JFK was assassinated, and 24 when Robert was gunned down.
They were both inspiring leaders. As I remember, they were able to interject ALTRUISM into the concept of Patriotism.
It felt good to an American and the future seemed bright with promise.
I felt that Obama evoked my memories of the Kennedys the first time I heard him speak.
The Kennedys wealth and status seemed to be directed to public service, rather than greed and enrichment of the few at the expense of the many.
The endorsement does reinforce my intention to vote for Obama.
Posted by: MaryMomgret on 01/28/08 at 1:17 PM Respond
I was seventeen when JFK was assassinated, and 24 when Robert was gunned down.
They were both inspiring leaders. As I remember, they were able to interject ALTRUISM into the concept of Patriotism.
It felt good to an American and the future seemed bright with promise.
I felt that Obama evoked my memories of the Kennedys the first time I heard him speak.
The Kennedys wealth and status seemed to be directed to public service, rather than greed and enrichment of the few at the expense of the many.
The endorsement does reinforce my intention to vote for Obama.
Posted by: MaryMomgret on 01/28/08 at 1:18 PM Respond
Endorsements matter because they come with access to donor lists. So, yes, they still matter.
Posted by: Zack on 01/28/08 at 1:58 PM Respond
Endorsements like the Ted Kennedy one certainly matter. Since my man Bill Richardson dropped out, I've been having a hard time deciding who to support. Being that I am a liberal in the Ted Kennedy tradition, his endorsement speaks volumes to me. I respect his opinion anyway, but even more so given the fact that he knows both Obama and Clinton far better than I do.
On the other hand, I really don't care who Oprah supports.
Posted by: phd on 01/28/08 at 2:12 PM Respond
The Republicans are nearing the PERFECT STORM! Will we be ready if the magic 70% is reached to affect permanent structural changes. We will only have about six years before they regroup and launch a counterattack. Who is the Democratic President is really marginal. Its the CONGRESS my dear friend. A big problem Democrats, many, who run Democrat and vote Republican. They have also got to go. The tide is on our side let's get organized!
Posted by: Jam on 01/28/08 at 2:34 PM Respond
Well, Ted Kennedy's endorsement matters to me. Of course, I am in that old New Deal category having voted in every election since 1950.
I had issues with both Clinton and Obama. She, like Bill, is a member in good standing of the DLC which is part of the reason I didn't vote for him in '96. His recent reckless or malicious behavior on her part got me to worrying what he would do if she were elected.
I had issues with Obama too. There is a distinct odor of snake-oil about him. Running against Washington is an age old populist method of garnering votes but it is a bad idea once in office. Remember Jimmy Carter?
In the end, the Chronicle's editorial endorsement which I found well considered and Ted Kennedy's endorsement tipped me over - I sent in my absentee ballot for Obama this morning.
Posted by: Roger Kovach on 01/28/08 at 3:46 PM Respond
I believe a person tells you who they are according to his or her friends. Did any body see who Bush had around him or did you all miss that? As a african-american who suffers no matter who is in the white house, should vote "Republicain and leave all you people swing in the air.
Posted by: GerriG on 01/28/08 at 5:18 PM Respond
It coudin hoit!!
Posted by: Richard C.Marsh on 01/28/08 at 6:53 PM Respond
It coudin hoit!!
Posted by: Richard C.Marsh on 01/28/08 at 6:54 PM Respond
It coudin hoit!! this is my first
Posted by: Richard C.Marsh on 01/28/08 at 6:56 PM Respond
It goes beyond the endorsement. Kennedy's energetic campaigning for Obama can help w/ the latinos, older folk, women and Boomers; Dems who haven't decided who to vote for between the three frontrunners. Just look at the images of the State of the Union speech. Obama/Kennedy stole the show. It's tremendously significant not only for the support at fundraisers and access to the Kennedy network but for failing to support Clinton.
Posted by: bb2dp on 01/28/08 at 9:54 PM Respond
Of course, "endorsement, the news item" is not all there is to this. Kennedy has an organization and a community of supporters. Having another community of Democrats added to Obama's gives him more power and influence (that's what politics is really about power -- not air time or fame). It adds to the influence that is needed is among the Democratic superdelegates (read Democratic party powerful). Believe it or not, the "people" are a fraction of the power to make the choice. The superdelegates have the power to choose when there is a tight race between nomination candidates. They will choose our next President. These superdelegates don't count air time, but the size and influence of the community of supporters in the party. That is how the superdelegates make their choices. The superdelegates that see Kennedy as their source of power will follow his lead. Watch and see!
Posted by: Rich Williams on 01/29/08 at 4:54 AM Respond
Endorsements can certainly help to persuade people who are on the fence--the large group of voters who seem to be making up their minds in the last several days prior to each primary/caucus. Also, don't overlook the power of association. Barack is now coupled with the image and politics associated with not only Ted Kennedy and his illustrious career in politics, but also (through Caroline's endorsement) even more strongly with the legacy and mystique of the Kennedy name. As others have said, it certainly won't hurt him, and will bolster his liberal image.
Posted by: Mike Sosulski on 01/29/08 at 8:03 PM Respond
I think they should matter when you have the type of people that have endorsed Hillary and Huckabee.
Hillary has Jenna Jameson and O.J. Simpson and Huckabee has Ric Flair, Ted Nugent and Chuck Norris. Amazing.
Posted by: brianr on 01/30/08 at 5:46 AM Respond
ARCHIVE
January 27, 2008 - February 2, 2008
January 20, 2008 - January 26, 2008
January 13, 2008 - January 19, 2008
January 6, 2008 - January 12, 2008
December 30, 2007 - January 5, 2008
December 23, 2007 - December 29, 2007
December 16, 2007 - December 22, 2007
December 9, 2007 - December 15, 2007
December 2, 2007 - December 8, 2007
November 25, 2007 - December 1, 2007
November 18, 2007 - November 24, 2007
November 11, 2007 - November 17, 2007
November 4, 2007 - November 10, 2007
October 28, 2007 - November 3, 2007
October 21, 2007 - October 27, 2007
October 14, 2007 - October 20, 2007
October 7, 2007 - October 13, 2007
September 30, 2007 - October 6, 2007
September 23, 2007 - September 29, 2007
September 16, 2007 - September 22, 2007
September 9, 2007 - September 15, 2007
September 2, 2007 - September 8, 2007
August 26, 2007 - September 1, 2007
August 19, 2007 - August 25, 2007
August 12, 2007 - August 18, 2007
August 5, 2007 - August 11, 2007
July 29, 2007 - August 4, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
When and Where We Enter, Male Chauvinist Pigs Follow: Is 'Purdah' the Answer to Male Privilege? (17)
gene wrote:
Sorry, that last comment should have been "We AREN'T all j...
[more]
What Does the Edwards Withdrawal Mean? (16)
jes wrote:
Ultimately, I will support whoever wins the nomination. M...
[more]
"Mexican Americans...take Spanish...in Summer School...And Get B's"...: Or are we Buying Into The Hype? (17)
Real wrote:
Tyrone that is the problem you think everyone owes you som...
[more]
Edwards to Obama: "Our Voices Together Are More Powerful Than Our Voices Alone" (21)
Ebony wrote:
Lesley, that is just the way the real people talk. Get rea...
[more]
Blackwater's Disaster Movie! (3)
Chris morgan wrote:
First class propagnda! What I want to know is this"; do th...
[more]
Sex Slaves and Rape Victims: Feminist, Not Paranoid (2)
Stephen wrote:
You should really try to polish your vitriol into some sor...
[more]
The Unresolved Questions of the Florida Primary (6)
Bleeding-Heart Liberal wrote:
Voters to Rudy: get lost. Well, he's not the first candida...
[more]
Coalition Of The Dwindling—Australia Is Leaving; Who's Left? (2)
Tariq wrote:
No more wars for Zionism. (Steven Edwards, The Ottawa Citi...
[more]
In Endorsing Obama, Kennedy Anoints a Prince and Tells Clintons To Cool It (29)
Ian Tepoot wrote:
Sharon:
You are trying to dig up dirt where none exists. ...
[more]
First Kennedy, Now Kerry Blasts the Clinton Campaign (8)
soopermouse wrote:
How is this measure unlike the one that gave Bush the pres...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


RECENT ENTRIES
Obama Goes General
Clinton Campaign Keeps On Pushing Bogus Rationale
More on McCain's Climate Change Speech Today
China Outlaws Pringles and Fanta
The Weird McCain-Dictator Connection
Bob Barr Throws Down Gauntlet to Ron Paul
Obama-McCain Could Create Some Fun Moments
McCain Portrays Himself as Environmental Champion, but Record Undercuts Credibility
"Sacking" of Washington Mid East Hand Points Up Growing Rift Between D.C. Ideology and Israeli Pragmatism