Happy Anniversary, Colin Powell

Today is not only Super Tuesday; it's the fifth anniversary of Colin Powell's important speech to the U.N., during which he greased the way to George W. Bush's war in Iraq with his own prestige. In our book, Hubris: The Inside Story of Spin, Scandal, and the Selling of the Iraq War, Michael Isikoff and I detail how the speech came to be: how Scooter Libby and others at the White House tried to fill the speech with even more dubious allegations than it ended up containing, how Powell ignored complaints from State Department intelligence analysts who told him that parts of the speech were inaccurate, how Powell's claim of a "sinister nexus" between Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda was based on bad information obtained from an al Qaeda suspect during violent interrogations. We also published on-the-record comments from Powell, in which he complained he had been unfairly tagged by this speech. What about members of Congress? he asked. What about President Bush? They all said the same things that he had said. Why, he groused, do people still keep blaming him?

Fair or not, Powell went to bat for Bush's war at the United Nations. Every major WMD charge in that speech—not most, but every—turned out to be wrong. (Jonathan Schwartz details it all here.) And Powell then stuck by the president through the initial mismanagement of the war and through the election in 2004—helping Bush to win reelection. What a public servant.

Today is a good moment to reflect on where Powell is now: nowhere. He has largely left public life. He makes speeches at how-to-succeed conferences—no doubt, pulling in $50,000 to $100,000 (or more) a pop. But he has no voice in the national discourse. He barely weighs in on policy debates. He doesn't hit the op-ed pages much. He's not on television. He doesn't write books. Perhaps he's decent enough to feel shame over his role in the fiasco.

And are any of the candidates seeking his endorsement? Would it help any of them? Powell was once one of the most popular men in America. He seemingly could have waltzed into the White House, but chose not to run. Were he to endorse Barack Obama, that would clash with Obama's antiwar street cred. Were he to endorse John McCain, that would remind voters of the war's start—and two-thirds of Americans tell pollsters they believe the war was a mistake.

It's true that many others bear culpability for the war—Bush and Dick Cheney foremost among them. But Powell enabled them all. He was the front man. So if he did become the fall guy, he was a guilty one.

Comments

Yes, the W.H. used him just like they used us. It is time for a change in direction. We do not need anyone to run our country who is in the present administration and voted for that war.

Posted by: MSO on 02/05/08 at 10:20 AM Respond

I don't know how things are with members of the media, but with me, when someone--even someone in my own government--tells me to go kill an Iraqi or any other human being (and especially one who's a stranger to me, and one who hasn't been tried and, so, remains innocent), the least I expect to receive is the ability to see evidence in favor of the need for me (and maybe for anyone) to go and to do such a thing.

The media, and not excluding the non-MSM, didn't insist upon the government's sharing with me such info, not even if I was one of the troops who would be expected to carry out their desired deed for them. No way did Colin Powell accomplish what he did (and not excluding the perversion of our system of justice) and do it without the aid of a willing media.

More than 4,000 of us are dead, and the media still point to Colin Powell. My response to them is "Not this time, either."

Posted by: jeb on 02/05/08 at 2:19 PM Respond

"do it without the aid of a willing media."

*******

"The Press was protected so that it could bare the secrets of the government and inform the people. Only a free and unrestrained press can effectively expose deception in government. And paramount among the responsibilities of a free press is the duty to prevent any part of the government from deceiving the people."
~ Justice Hugo L. Black - (1886-1971) US Supreme Court Justice - Source: New York Times v. Unites States (Pentagon Papers) 1971

******

The media have MORE culpability (IMHO)

Posted by: capt on 02/05/08 at 3:06 PM Respond

The scary part is that we elect the President by thinking what a person is and not first finding out what a person is.
Collin is a example here so is Hilary the person she says she is and Obama? and therefore John Macain.
Scary is it Not? because this thime WE NEED THE RIGHT PRESIDENT.

Posted by: Sean Baines on 02/06/08 at 6:06 AM Respond

埼玉　ハウスメーカー

Posted by: 出会いサイト on 08/12/08 at 10:55 PM Respond