«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
Live Blog from CA: Bring in the Big Guns!
SAN JOSE, CA — Just now I was reading the California newspapers from my fold-out table in Obama HQ when a woman sat down at my elbow and logged into a MacBook. She hunted and pecked, fretting over her email. I figured her for just another first-time volunteer. Turns out she was U.S. Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren, pecking out an email to the county's top voting official. You've got to love Lofgren--if not because she's campaigning for Obama, then for her ability to carry off the standard-issue DC pantsuit along with a very cool pair of blue-and-pink silk Chinese slippers.
Lofgren and her son had just come from eating lunch downtown at Teske's Germania, where she dines before every election. She'd ordered a gigantic pork shank. "It's kind of a good luck charm," she said. "I was going to actually order a salad because I've been trying to lose weight, but I didn't want to break the luck."
Lofgren has been in Congress for 14 years and has never seen an election bring in so many new volunteers. "In a Democratic event I walk in and I know everybody by name," she said, looking around the room. "These are all new people." Most volunteers didn't know her either--no crowd had gathered round until word got out who she was.
This is to be expected of a campaign that has harnessed a new wave of young voters. Several guys working the phones right now haven't even started growing facial hair. It's fun to watch these kids make things up as they go. This morning San Jose State student Sarah Bronstein was talking with another college kid about the Obama pitch they were reciting over the phone to voters. "It's a shitty script," she said. "They should write is as if someone is actually talking." So she tweaked it--one of countless of small examples today of DIY.
Excitement today goes beyond young people and Obama. This is the first time in recent history that California has played such a prominent role in choosing the presidential candidate, and the first time since the '50s that the election didn't feature an incumbent president or VP. Turnout is expected to resemble the much higher numbers of a general election. Of course, the bigger crowds at the polls have made snags more likely--which is why Lofgren has swooped in to fire off an email to the county elections chief. Obama staffers here had received a few reports that poll workers were incorrectly telling independent voters that they couldn't vote in the Democratic primary. If that problem becomes widespread, it would favor Clinton and hurt Obama, who polls better among independents.
Update: Lofgren's concern appears to have been merited. The Washington Post reports that confusion over independent voters and Democratic ballots has been widespread. Still, it does not yet appear to be a major factor in the race.
Comments
Keep the updates and observations coming. You are the MoJo eyes and ears for all of us.
"the first time since the '50s that the election didn't feature a White House incumbent."
Hmmm?
2000.
If Al Gore counted as a White House incumbent then, then I think Hill makes a case for a White House incumbent now...
She certainly touts her years in the WH as being more than just a bystander.
Posted by: GetReal on 02/05/08 at 4:38 PM Respond
Websters dictionary is not specific but I think "incumbent" means running for re-election to the same position so a VP running for president is not an incumbent.
******
Just voted (ABQ NM) - it took a few minutes and the lines were substantial - I hear some folks in Rio Rancho waited three hours.
I hope the numbers are huge - the more people the better.
Posted by: capt on 02/05/08 at 6:14 PM Respond
I've corrected the incumbent statement. I meant pres or vp, but such are the perils of live blogging on the fly
Posted by: Josh Harkinson on 02/05/08 at 7:25 PM Respond
I've corrected the incumbent statement. I meant pres or vp, but such are the perils of live blogging on the fly
Posted by: sohbet on 09/11/08 at 5:23 PM Respond
ARCHIVE
September 7, 2008 - September 13, 2008
August 31, 2008 - September 6, 2008
August 24, 2008 - August 30, 2008
August 17, 2008 - August 23, 2008
August 10, 2008 - August 16, 2008
August 3, 2008 - August 9, 2008
July 27, 2008 - August 2, 2008
April 20, 2008 - April 26, 2008
April 13, 2008 - April 19, 2008
April 6, 2008 - April 12, 2008
March 30, 2008 - April 5, 2008
March 23, 2008 - March 29, 2008
March 16, 2008 - March 22, 2008
March 9, 2008 - March 15, 2008
February 24, 2008 - March 1, 2008
February 17, 2008 - February 23, 2008
February 10, 2008 - February 16, 2008
February 3, 2008 - February 9, 2008
January 27, 2008 - February 2, 2008
January 20, 2008 - January 26, 2008
January 13, 2008 - January 19, 2008
RECENT COMMENTS
Live Blog from CA: Bring in the Big Guns! (5)
sohbet wrote:
I've corrected the incumbent statement. I meant pres or vp...
[more]
Ron Paul Rallies the Troops; What's His Next Move? (54)
sohbet wrote:
thank you...
[more]
Mathematical Model Predicts Obama Win by Ten Points (1)
Brian J wrote:
Hey, I still have a gut feeling Obama is going to win. I t...
[more]
DA Refuses to Prosecute Rape Case, Despite Eye Witnesses, DNA (73)
sohbet wrote:
thank you...
[more]
On Iran, Bush May Talk Tough, But the Results Are Lacking (13)
sohbet wrote:
Is this what 'supporters' of Israel have sunk to? Destro...
[more]
Turkey To Issue "Final Warning" to Iraq (3)
sohbet wrote:
thank you...
[more]
Bill Clinton to Continue Attacking Obama '08 for Acting Like Clinton '92 (18)
sohbet wrote:
thank you...
[more]
Taking a Look at Bush's Economic Stimulus (25)
sohbet wrote:
thank you...
[more]
The Hack Gap Revisited: "Lipstick on a Pig" Edition (39)
key ödemeleri wrote:
the real pig is Pelosi...
[more]
Sarah Palin on Russia (1)
Shaijinx wrote:
I know it is difficult to judge the tone of the written wo...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


Posted by: capt on 02/05/08 at 3:51 PM Respond