«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
Ted Stevens Takes Aim At Exxon
Alaska Senator Ted Stevens is a busy guy, what with the FBI raiding his house and all. But recently he took time out of his regular pork-barrel business to return to the practice of law. Stevens is a Harvard Law school grad, and was a practicing lawyer before he was elected to Congress in 1964. He recently dusted off his law books and wrote an amicus brief on behalf of Alaska fisherpeople who sued Exxon after a drunk sea captain crashed its oil tanker, the Valdez, into Prince William Sound in 1989, spilling 11 million gallons of crude oil into the delicate ecosystem.
An Alaska jury hit Exxon with a $5 billion verdict in 1994, but Exxon hasn’t paid a dime of it. Instead, it has appealed the case for so long that 8,000 of the original class members in the lawsuit have since died without seeing the case resolved, according to the Anchorage Daily News.In the latest installment of the long-running litigation, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed in October to hear the case.
Sen. Stevens has written an amicus brief in support of the plaintiffs, drawing on his vast knowledge of maritime law that includes a law review article he wrote back in 1950, which is cited in the brief, according to the Wall Street Journal. Stevens told the Journal that he didn’t think the justices would actually look up his article, but that he wanted to establish that he had some expertise in the area. “I don’t imagine the justices look at these amicus briefs that much,” he said.
Comments
it's a series of tubes!
I'll be darned. First good thing Ted Stevens has ever done?
Posted by: Rawlston on 02/06/08 at 9:23 AM Respond
Wow, thank you, Senator, for actually doing something for your constituents, in between drafting proposals for the next Bridge to Nowhere. Kudos, sir.
Posted by: Charity on 02/06/08 at 9:28 AM Respond
I understand the attorney on the short list for Attorney General if Hillary wins is a lawyer defending Exxon in this suit.
Love it when Hillary stands up for the little guy.
Posted by: elydog on 02/06/08 at 11:25 AM Respond
If, Senator Stevens knew anything about the law maybe
he would had something done
to Exxon For sure.
But, I laughed at how little
he knew about the internet,
so I suppose he came out about
the same on Exxon.
He really should retire, like some of the others up there.
Posted by: Virgie on 02/06/08 at 11:35 AM Respond
Drunk captain is not the true story. The captain was drunk but was not on the bridge at the time.
Further, Exxon was in direct violation of the agreement they signed with respect to safety precautions. This agreement was a requirement in order to use Valdez as the port for their oil.
Check out the real story about Exxon (and BP) with respect to Valdez at my blog. It's pretty shocking how foreseeable and avoidable this was.
tinyurl.com/39j9rz
Don't believe blogs? Neither do I. So, I provided links to real information in my post.
Posted by: Misanthropic Scott on 02/06/08 at 2:02 PM Respond
ARCHIVE
February 3, 2008 - February 9, 2008
January 27, 2008 - February 2, 2008
January 20, 2008 - January 26, 2008
January 13, 2008 - January 19, 2008
January 6, 2008 - January 12, 2008
December 30, 2007 - January 5, 2008
December 23, 2007 - December 29, 2007
December 16, 2007 - December 22, 2007
December 9, 2007 - December 15, 2007
December 2, 2007 - December 8, 2007
November 25, 2007 - December 1, 2007
November 18, 2007 - November 24, 2007
November 11, 2007 - November 17, 2007
November 4, 2007 - November 10, 2007
October 28, 2007 - November 3, 2007
October 21, 2007 - October 27, 2007
October 14, 2007 - October 20, 2007
October 7, 2007 - October 13, 2007
September 30, 2007 - October 6, 2007
September 23, 2007 - September 29, 2007
September 16, 2007 - September 22, 2007
September 9, 2007 - September 15, 2007
September 2, 2007 - September 8, 2007
August 26, 2007 - September 1, 2007
August 19, 2007 - August 25, 2007
August 12, 2007 - August 18, 2007
August 5, 2007 - August 11, 2007
July 29, 2007 - August 4, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
Ann Coulter Is Insane Over McCain, Supporting Hillary (15)
jj wrote:
Hey all! Actually, I said the same thing earlier today wit...
[more]
Which Dem Is Better Able to Beat John McCain? (62)
macduck wrote:
To those of you who say you'll vote for McCain because you...
[more]
Romney Out; What Will Huckabee Do? (15)
Dana Ward wrote:
Strikes me that the far more logical choice is Leiberman a...
[more]
Is it Time To Worry about Superdelegates in the Clinton-Obama Contest? (8)
Thom Tibor wrote:
I think that the Super Delegate plot is the Democratic Par...
[more]
OSC's Investigation of Rove May be Legit. Very Legit (2)
iyinet webmaster forumu 2008 seo yarışması wrote:
Yorumsuz....
[more]
Time for A Superdelegate Pledge (3)
denis wrote:
I respectfully disagree. It is probable that almost 1/2 o...
[more]
Attorney General John Edwards? (28)
Elaine N. Ramey wrote:
I have said it many times before and I will say it again, ...
[more]
CPAC's Coulterkampf (13)
Dave P. wrote:
What I don't understand is why she insists on putting her ...
[more]
Can Hillary Stop Obamamentum? (38)
patti wrote:
I think a lot of people are underestimating the JR Senat...
[more]
How Will Ron Paul's Libertarian Fans View His Big Anti-Abortion Endorsement? (17)
Unbelievable wrote:
Wow, I never knew that being a Libertarian meant we all ha...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


RECENT ENTRIES
Canadian Corporal Killed by "Roommate's Rifle" in Afghanistan, Case Goes to Court Martial
Is Blackwater Leaving the Security Biz?
Some Inconvenient Truths About The Olympics
Liberal Lawyer Helping Louisiana Kill That Guy
Fifty Years Without Running Water
While Troops Travel in Squalor, Air Force Brass Choose Swatches for First Class Cabins
Iraq: Provincial Elections Could Be Delayed
Minimum Wage Goes Up Thursday
Phil Gramm: Gone But Not Forgotten