MOTHER JONES BY E-MAIL
May 13, 2008

«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»

Hillary Clinton Talks Withdrawal

Hillary Clinton delivered a major speech on the Iraq War this morning. She didn't say anything groundbreaking, but the speech did provide her with a nice opportunity to reiterate her support for a sensible and well-planned withdrawal, the bread and butter of many Democratic voters. Here are chunks of a summary the Clinton campaign blitzed out to reporters.

The basics of her plan have been known for months:

As President, one of Hillary's first official actions will be to convene the Joint Chiefs of Staff, her Secretary of Defense, and her National Security Council. She will direct them to draw up a clear, comprehensive plan for withdrawal that starts removing our troops within 60 days...
Hillary knows that as we bring our troops and contractors home, we cannot lose sight of our very real strategic interests in this region. Al Qaeda terrorist cells continue to operate in Iraq, cells that did not exist before President Bush’s failed policy. Under Hillary’s plan the United States will retain counterterrorism forces in Iraq and the region to fight al Qaeda and will not permit terrorists to have a safe haven in Iraq from which to attack the United States or its allies.

According to the speech, Clinton will ensure that for every month a member of the military spends in the field, they get one month here at home. She will reign in the use of no-bid contracts and private contractors will get the boot:

As U.S. troops begin to withdraw, we should not be leaving unaccountable, often irresponsible private military contractors to carry arms and engage in combat-oriented missions and security functions. Hillary has co-sponsored the Stop Security Outsourcing Act, which seeks to end this practice. As President, Hillary will work toward a ban on armed private military contractors providing security for diplomatic personnel and performing mission-critical functions.

She wants to bring the U.N. in to jump start political conciliation. She wants to ensure Iraq's reconstruction money is being spent well by appointing a special counsel. She will provide funds to protect and resettle Iraq's refugees. And most of all, regional diplomacy will be a key focus:

As President, Hillary will have a unique opportunity to reach out to our allies and partners in the region and press them to take greater responsibility for what happens in Iraq. She will hold a major regional stabilization meeting early on in her Presidency. This group will be composed of key allies, other global powers, and all of the states bordering Iraq.

Two things should be obvious. First, Clinton doesn't want to simply "wave the white flag of surrender," like John McCain alleges. She has a sensible plan for withdrawal that carefully weighs several crucial factors and chooses the option that is best for us and for the country we are leaving. (The same, of course, can be said for Barack Obama.) Second, no matter who you support in the Democratic Party, if you support ending the war you have to acknowledge that Clinton intends to do so. I think it's fair to say that Clinton has been more hawkish than Obama in the past (supported the Iraq War, voted to classify Iran's Revolutionary Guard as a terrorist organization), but if you take this plan to be an honest representation of her current views in Iraq, she's solid on the issue.

That, of course, is what her campaign is trying to explain to people. In recent primaries, Obama has done better among war voters. The Clinton campaign is trying to attack his strength, suggesting that he isn't prepared to be commander-in-chief and suggesting that his record on Iraq is "just words" (in fact, they sent out a memo to reporters this morning alleging just that). If it can weaken Obama on the issue and convince voters that Clinton is just as serious about withdrawal as he is, the campaign will have neutralized one of Obama's most important selling points.






Comments

So what has she been doing about this for the last 5 years? Now that it's important to her campaign to look as if she is against the war, she sings a different song from the one she sang when she voted Bush unprecedented powers to destroy our country's standing and good will around the workd.

Posted by: Bill G on 03/17/08 at 8:11 AM  Respond

What has she been doing for the last 5 years? Do you mean the five years when the Republicans (including Joe Lieberman) were either in the majority or could muster enough votes to filibuster any meaningful discussion of withdrawal?

Too bad she couldn't use all those super-powers Hillary-haters claim she has.

And, the crap about her voting for the AUMF: Most of us Democrats don't approve of it, but if you're too dense to at least understand her reasoning, then you're not qualified to make any kind of political judgments.

And remember: almost 50% of the Democrats have voted for Senator Clinton in this very tight race. If Senator Obama wins the nomination, we're going to need her support and her voters. Unless you want to try to keep your "ideological purity" under President McCain, you should try to keep your hatred in check.

Posted by: evano on 03/17/08 at 9:20 AM  Respond

"If it can weaken Obama on the issue and convince voters"

IF the "memo" sent to reporters "alleging" anything is just parroted by "reporters" I guess it could convince voters of most anything. That is if the "reporters" are just a transfer point for whatever BS is alleged by whomsoever has some allegation at the moment.

Man you gotta love the label "reporter" it is exact.

Where are the journalists on this?

Posted by: capt on 03/17/08 at 10:18 AM  Respond

Hillary Clinton's speeches are just words which change with every poll. If tomorrow the voters were in support of the war, she'd start chattering about how she voted for it and her opponent was against it from the beginning.

Posted by: Judy on 03/17/08 at 10:19 AM  Respond

Nice one Judy

Posted by: brightledge on 03/17/08 at 12:07 PM  Respond

"the United States will retain counterterrorism forces in Iraq"

" if you support ending the war you have to acknowledge that Clinton intends to do so."

Um, no. It sounds as though she intends a continued occupation.

Posted by: JG on 03/17/08 at 12:08 PM  Respond

"...if you take this plan to be an honest representation of her current views in Iraq, she's solid on the issue."

That's a pretty big IF. Given her bad judgement about invading Iraq in the first place, I think voters have good reasons to be skeptical about her. And is her position that solid? What will make Hillary Clinton's "anti-terrorism force" different from the current ocupation? Which terrorists will they fight, al-Qaeda or the Shia death squads? I say it's time to quit Iraq, completely and permanently.

Posted by: Eric on 03/17/08 at 1:57 PM  Respond

This is for Hillary Bashers, You better check out Obama and McCain before you start bashing. I just read a lot of things about Obama from the Chicago area. Better check into his Rezko friend and money dealings. It is available.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rDHsHM0laT8&feature=related

Also if you like War go for McCain. He will carry on the Bush War and it is being called the 100 year war.

Posted by: Freda on 03/17/08 at 2:58 PM  Respond

I was so excited when I saw your headline: "Hillary Clinton Talks Withdrawal"-- I thought finally, against all expectations, she was thinking of the Democratic Party and the will of the people! But no, it was just more doublespeak from one of the two pro-war candidates. What a let down.

Posted by: Peace Nick on 03/17/08 at 3:58 PM  Respond

The most convincing Democratic contender on Iraq was neither Clinton nor Obama but Biden. Both the remaining Democratic hopefuls talk about withdrawal in terms of schedules as if they were leaving summer camp. Biden went into the complexity of the situation by suggesting a federatio of substates which could each accommodate one or other of several seemingly irreconcilable ethnic and/or religious groups. Obama seemed less than versed on these problems during the early presidential debates.

Posted by: Kathy Giannini on 03/17/08 at 5:41 PM  Respond

Post a comment





 

RECENT COMMENTS

Careful, Obama. Humorless Feminists Are Watching (14)
Lynda in Denver wrote: Might want to check this out as well: http://www.commondr... [more]

Pennsylvania Voters: Not So Comfortable With Obama Anymore (29)
Justin wrote: To Bill, and all you other white cronies, It's not a matt... [more]

The John Edwards Endorsement: A Last Chance To Prove He's No Phony (154)
star555 wrote: I do not care who Edwards supports. ... [more]

Mike Huckabee Seems Like a Reasonable Dude (6)
MR wrote: Huckabee's statement, 'And I think that you have to cut so... [more]

Two Inconsistencies from Obama's Past (7)
Gil Reed wrote: Can you imagine what Republicans will do to Obama in Novem... [more]

Cheney on America's Opposition to the War: "So?" (14)
geezer wrote: As horrible is it to admit, Cheney is probably the most ho... [more]

Day Nine: No Straight Talk from McCain on Parsley's Call for Destroying Islam (9)
Muslim wrote: Bill/SFCMAC: I am a Muslim. Do you want to destroy me? ... [more]

"Black and More Than Black": Obama's Daring and Unique Speech on Race (244)
Purple State Pundit wrote: Obama has never praised Farrakhan. And he has strongly con... [more]

Geraldine Ferraro: Obama Is Lucky to Be Black (53)
kayman wrote: interesting, however obama only considers himself black in... [more]

Replaying the Iraq War's Greatest Hits, Five Years On (5)
kat wrote: Remember, the Republicans (read: right wing conservatives)... [more]

XML RSS Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.33

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com

















bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN


This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2008 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS