According to Brill, he has since received a letter from Issa and has been assured that the "hearing testimony will also receive an amendment clarifying the intent of the commentary about Lotus Notes." Several calls to Issa's office last week and today went unreturned, and Brill has also yet to respond to email and telephone inquiries.

Several IT experts I contacted vehemently disagreed with Issa's original evaluation of Lotus. David Gewirtz, a former computer science professor who now publishes industry magazines for Lotus Notes and Microsoft Outlook professionals, called Issa's statements an "absolute mischaracterization."

"Lotus Notes is an enterprise class, high performance, very, very up-to-date high-level software," Gewirtz says. "It went through its most recent upgrade 3 months ago, and it's deployed in some of the world's largest enterprises. It's one of the best."

Jeff Schiller, the Network Manager and Security Architect at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, agreed with Gewirtz's assessment. "There are some very innovative features to Lotus Notes that nothing else duplicates," he said. "I suspect it is actually superior technologically" to competing products.

While the merits of Lotus and other email software products can certainly be debated, even Theresa Payton, the White House Office of Administration's Chief Information Officer, seems to agree that any archiving program is better than the system (which has included manually saving emails) that the Bush administration put in place. Asked during last month's hearing whether she ever wished her predecessors hadn't scrapped the Lotus-based system, Payton, who went to work for the White House in 2006, said, "Obviously it would be nice."