«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
GAO: U.S. Lacks Coherent Strategy in Pakistan's Tribal Areas

The GAO has released a new report (.pdf) that takes federal agencies to task for not coordinating their counter-terrorism efforts in Pakistan's Federally Administered Tribal Area (FATA)—the mountainous, fiercely independent border region where Osama Bin Laden is believed to be hiding and where Al Qaeda and Taliban insurgents have begun to rebuild their operational strength. The report, titled "Combating Terrorism: The United States Lacks Comprehensive Plan to Destroy the Terrorist Threat and Close the Safe Haven in Pakistan's Federally Administered Tribal Areas," is the first in a series that the GAO plans to release in the coming months, documenting American missteps in the region and suggesting fixes that might jump start a more focused strategy.
An excerpt from today's release:
The United States has not met its national security goals to destroy terrorist threats and close the safe haven in Pakistan's FATA. Since 2002, the United States relied principally on the Pakistan military to address U.S. national security goals. Of the approximately $5.8 billion the United States provided for efforts in the FATA and border region from 2002 through 2007, about 96 percent reimbursed Pakistan for military operations there. According to the Department of State, Pakistan deployed 120,000 military and paramilitary forces in the FATA and helped kill and capture hundreds of suspected al Qaeda operatives; these efforts cost the lives of approximately 1,400 members of Pakistan's security forces. However, GAO found broad agreement, as documented in the National Intelligence Estimate, State, and embassy documents, as well as Defense officials in Pakistan, that al Qaeda had regenerated its ability to attack the United States and has succeeded in establishing a safe haven in Pakistan's FATA.
No comprehensive plan for meeting U.S. national security goals in the FATA has been developed... Neither the National Security Council (NSC), NCTC, nor other executive branch departments have developed a comprehensive plan that includes all elements of national power—called for by the various national security strategies and Congress. As a result, since 2002, the U.S. embassy in Pakistan has had no Washington-supported, comprehensive plan to combat terrorism and close the terrorist safe haven in the FATA. In 2006, the embassy, in conjunction with Defense, State, and U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), and in cooperation with the government of Pakistan, began an effort to focus more attention on other key elements of national power, such as development assistance and public diplomacy, to address U.S. goals in the FATA. However, this does not yet constitute a comprehensive plan.
Given the lack of an overall strategy, the GAO goes on to recommend that the White House, the National Counter-Terrorism Center, USAID, the various intelligence services, and the departments of State and Defense ""work to develop a comprehensive plan using all elements of national power to combat the terrorist threat and close the associated safe haven in Pakistan's FATA region."
Now, is it just me or does this seem a bit late? Going on seven years since the attacks on New York and Washington... and after all of the subsequent debate over the U.S. government's disjointed approach to dealing with Al Qaeda in the run up to 9/11, the stove-piping of intelligence information, and the overall lack of communication between various parts of the executive branch... it seems we still can't get our federal agencies to play nice.
But fret not, for Congress is on the case. Earlier today, Rep. Howard Berman (D-Calif.), chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, announced a hearing to be held May 7, where members will examine the GAO's findings and "discuss actions that a new U.S. administration can take to reconstitute our foreign policy in this region, to refocus our efforts on eliminating terrorist threats there, and to rebuild our relationship with the Pakistani people."
Photo used under a Creative Commons license from soldiersmediacenter.
Comments
ARCHIVE
April 13, 2008 - April 19, 2008
April 6, 2008 - April 12, 2008
March 30, 2008 - April 5, 2008
March 23, 2008 - March 29, 2008
March 16, 2008 - March 22, 2008
March 9, 2008 - March 15, 2008
February 24, 2008 - March 1, 2008
February 17, 2008 - February 23, 2008
February 10, 2008 - February 16, 2008
February 3, 2008 - February 9, 2008
January 27, 2008 - February 2, 2008
January 20, 2008 - January 26, 2008
January 13, 2008 - January 19, 2008
January 6, 2008 - January 12, 2008
December 30, 2007 - January 5, 2008
December 23, 2007 - December 29, 2007
December 16, 2007 - December 22, 2007
December 9, 2007 - December 15, 2007
December 2, 2007 - December 8, 2007
November 25, 2007 - December 1, 2007
November 18, 2007 - November 24, 2007
November 11, 2007 - November 17, 2007
November 4, 2007 - November 10, 2007
October 28, 2007 - November 3, 2007
October 21, 2007 - October 27, 2007
October 14, 2007 - October 20, 2007
October 7, 2007 - October 13, 2007
September 30, 2007 - October 6, 2007
September 23, 2007 - September 29, 2007
September 16, 2007 - September 22, 2007
September 9, 2007 - September 15, 2007
September 2, 2007 - September 8, 2007
August 26, 2007 - September 1, 2007
August 19, 2007 - August 25, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
Clinton Bashes Obama's Weathermen Connection, But What About Her Own? (28)
pmet wrote:
Megan -
I wholeheartedly agree!...
[more]
New "Pro Israel, Pro Peace" Political Group Launches: J Street Hopes to Prod Washington MidEast Policy Towards Center (75)
Trollstein wrote:
Arron:
You wrote:
" . . .they {Greens} need not explain no...
[more]
The Smallness of Our Politics on Display at the ABC Debate (19)
Bill Nigh wrote:
???
Bill Ayers was not a terrorist. He (apparently) engage...
[more]
Warning Warning Warning: Nader at 8-10% in Michigan (17)
BlueBerry Pick'n wrote:
because NOBODY WANTS A POPULIST PLATFORM...
if they're a...
[more]
High Court Rules in Favor of Lethal Injection, But Throws the Debate Wide Open (5)
Bill Nigh wrote:
So, let me get this straight, you feel that when someo...
[more]
Your Weekly Joe Lieberman Outrage (31)
Marlene wrote:
I'm a registered Republican and I agree w/Mark E. Mr. McCa...
[more]
Protest the Olympics? The Conundrum for San Francisco Liberals (17)
Lucy Lu wrote:
"Splendid one", seems to me you have an ego as big as the ...
[more]
Prominent Irish Historian: Clinton Is "Silly" To Say She Was Instrumental in Peace Accords (25)
Dan Mortenson wrote:
Hillary thinks (with some justification) that the American...
[more]
Lindsey Graham Goes a Different Kind of Tax Cut Crazy (2)
DaveD wrote:
His statement is probably true as far as it goes. "Some" t...
[more]
McCain's Frightening Foreign Policy Vision From 2000 (8)
DaveD wrote:
Bill Nigh, what an enormous ego you have, thinking that *y...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


RECENT ENTRIES
McCain & Co. Find New Ways to Circumvent Campaign Finance Laws McCain Wrote
Will Trouble in Afghanistan Become a Tough Campaign Issue for McCain?
MoJo Convo: Iran Panic? A Follow Up Question for the Experts
Blogger Brian Beutler Shot, Expected to Make Full Recovery
Video: DNC Hammers McCain on Economic Double Talk
McCain Denies Ever Saying He Lacks Expertise on Economy
Report: Interrogation Instructors at Gitmo Taught Communist Tactics from 1950s
One More Clinton Campaign Post-Mortem: No Hierarchy, No Trust, No Comity
How to Think about Immunity