«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
Citing Fort Bragg Conditions, U.S. Army Broadens Barracks Inquiry
In case you haven't seen it, check out the video to the right for a look at the conditions of the 82nd Airborne Division's barracks at Fort Bragg. The footage was taken by Ed Frawley, the outraged father of one of the soldiers living there—a soldier who, along with the rest of his unit, had just returned from a 15-month deployment in Afghanistan, most of it spent at a remote firebase in the mountains. I hazard to guess that upon their return to North Carolina, some of the soldiers may have experienced pangs of nostalgia for the relative comfort of a combat post.
In response to the controversy brought on by the Fort Bragg video, the Army has announced an audit of all its barracks worldwide. According to Brigadier General Dennis Rogers, the officer in charge of barracks maintenance, initial inspections were carried out last weekend. The results have not yet been released. According to the Associated Press:
Rogers said it was too soon to know whether the Fort Bragg problem was an isolated incident. He acknowledged the revelations from a video shot by the father of an 82nd Airborne Division soldier showing poor conditions such as mold inside the barracks, peeling interior paint and a bathroom drain plugged with sewage...
"We let our soldiers down, and that's not like us," Rogers told reporters. "We let our soldiers down. That's not how we want America's sons and daughters to live. There's no good excuse for what happened."
He said the problems in that building have been fixed and that a final paint job is in the works. It is one of 24 barracks at Fort Bragg that were built in the 1950s and are scheduled for demolition by 2013. The barracks singled out by Frawley had been remodeled in April 2006, Rogers said.
Rogers said the Army's standard procedure is to inspect a barracks building to verify that it meets Army standards before it is occupied by soldiers returning from an overseas deployment. For reasons he was unable to explain, that apparently did not happen in the Fort Bragg incident.
On that note, the mystery of how things do or do not happen within the Pentagon bureaucracy is the subject of a piece by Scott Paltrow in the May issue of Portfolio magazine. In a nutshell, says Paltrow, the Pentagon can't keep track of its money, leaving billions of dollars of expenditures undocumented... every year. An excerpt from the piece:
Since 2004, the Pentagon has spent roughly $16 billion annually to maintain and modernize the military's business systems, but most are as unreliable as ever—even as the surge in defense spending is creating more room for error. The basic defense budget for 2007 was $439.3 billion, up 48 percent from 2001, excluding the vast additional sums appropriated for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. According to federal regulators and current and former Pentagon officials, the accounting process is so obsolete and error prone that it's virtually impossible to tell where much of this money ends up. While the department's brass has made a few patchwork improvements, billions are still unaccounted for. The problem is so deeply rooted that, 18 years after Congress required major federal agencies to be audited, the Pentagon still can't be...
For the first three quarters of 2007, $1.1 trillion in Army accounting entries hadn't been properly reviewed and substantiated, according to the Department of Defense's inspector general. In 2006, $258.2 billion of recorded withdrawals and payments from the Army's main account were unsupported. It's as if the Army had submitted multibillion-dollar expense reports without any receipts.
With problems like this, is it any wonder that someone in the Army's sprawling infrastructure forgot to inspect the Fort Bragg barracks before populating it with weary combat veterans?
Comments
"Support the troops" .... just like at Walter Reed.
"Rogers said the Army's standard procedure is to inspect a barracks building to verify that it meets Army standards before it is occupied by soldiers returning from an overseas deployment. For reasons he was unable to explain, that apparently did not happen in the Fort Bragg incident."
Or maybe it did "happen", but it's probably been outsourced. Perhaps to Halliburton? And who performed the "remodeling" in 2006?
But not to worry; that's not how we treat our troops, it was the fault of a few bad apples is all.
ARCHIVE
April 20, 2008 - April 26, 2008
April 13, 2008 - April 19, 2008
April 6, 2008 - April 12, 2008
March 30, 2008 - April 5, 2008
March 23, 2008 - March 29, 2008
March 16, 2008 - March 22, 2008
March 9, 2008 - March 15, 2008
February 24, 2008 - March 1, 2008
February 17, 2008 - February 23, 2008
February 10, 2008 - February 16, 2008
February 3, 2008 - February 9, 2008
January 27, 2008 - February 2, 2008
January 20, 2008 - January 26, 2008
January 13, 2008 - January 19, 2008
January 6, 2008 - January 12, 2008
December 30, 2007 - January 5, 2008
December 23, 2007 - December 29, 2007
December 16, 2007 - December 22, 2007
December 9, 2007 - December 15, 2007
December 2, 2007 - December 8, 2007
November 25, 2007 - December 1, 2007
November 18, 2007 - November 24, 2007
November 11, 2007 - November 17, 2007
November 4, 2007 - November 10, 2007
October 28, 2007 - November 3, 2007
October 21, 2007 - October 27, 2007
October 14, 2007 - October 20, 2007
October 7, 2007 - October 13, 2007
September 30, 2007 - October 6, 2007
September 23, 2007 - September 29, 2007
September 16, 2007 - September 22, 2007
September 9, 2007 - September 15, 2007
September 2, 2007 - September 8, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
Citing Fort Bragg Conditions, U.S. Army Broadens Barracks Inquiry (1)
DaveD wrote:
"Support the troops" .... just like at Walter Reed.
"Roge...
[more]
Fox News: Stephen Douglas and Frederick Douglass, What's the Difference? (5)
DaveD wrote:
I was just down in the cafeteria getting a cup of coffee, ...
[more]
Obama: Wright is "Wrong" and His Statements Contradict "My Public Life" (45)
MrX wrote:
The people here who are calling Rev. Wright a racist are m...
[more]
Clapping Along With Bush at the White House Correspondents' Dinner (36)
Barfbag wrote:
dear Angi, certain issues do not have anything to do with ...
[more]
Lou Dobbs, Racially Sensitive Verbal Magician (8)
Nancy wrote:
I'm no Lou Dobbs fan, but I use cotton-picking when I get ...
[more]
John McCain's Miserable Record on Hurricane Katrina (22)
Randy T wrote:
Correct we can not depend on government to protect us from...
[more]
Freedom's Watch Finds Its Inner Mother Theresa (3)
Michael L. Wagner wrote:
Cor Blimey Mate: Doesn't this takes you back to the days w...
[more]
Rev. Wright: A Neverending Cross for Obama To Bear (63)
Rowan Berkeley wrote:
You guys just threw the next election, to McCain. But then...
[more]
Another Prominent Republican Screwing With the Democrats (6)
Doris wrote:
Kristol is a NeoCon. A Zionist of the worse sort. This jus...
[more]
Freedom's Watch Attacks Nancy Pelosi -- for High Gas Prices? (3)
Nancy wrote:
It's Bush and his buddies's faults. He's attempting to bla...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


Posted by: DaveD on 05/01/08 at 4:52 AM Respond