«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
Carbon Offsets For Tummy Tucks?
Plastic surgery has long posed serious risks for many of its vain victims: death from infection, bursting boobs, migrating silicone and the like. But who knew it was also bad for the environment? The Washington City Paper reports that disposing of all the fat sucked out of people during liposuction and tummy tucks puts 1,000 tons of carbon into the atmosphere every year, largely because the fat (which is 78 percent carbon) is incinerated.
Since belly fat as biodiesel is a tough sell, a local upscale plastic surgery practice is now buying carbon offsets to cover disposing of its nips and tucks. The surgeons tell CP that while jogging would be a healthier alternative for shedding all that fat, it wouldn't make much difference on the environment because the exercise would still "liberate" carbon into the atmosphere. I find this claim somewhat dubious (especially given the self-interest of the source), but since I'm too science challenged to work this out on my own, I'll put this to you, dear readers: Are joggers really the human versions of farting cows, huffing out more carbon that fat incinerators?
Comments
ok, I am not science challenged to figure this out. But, I am more inclined to wonder when all these various carbon impacts for everything is added up we may very well reach a figure that is far beyond the number of miles driven by us. At that time, we will need to another baseline to compare the carbon impacts of everything.
Though, from a process standpoint, the tummy tuckee has to drive to the clinic where the tummy tuckers have to drive there too. Then once the deed is done, a bunch of things have to happen to actually move the tummy fat somewhere. Obviously, such packaging and transportation is more involved than dropping the fat in a baggy and hauling it off. Anyhow, once it gets to the incinerator, I assume there are checks and balances in place that kick in to ensure that such fat is actually incinerated. Anyhow, the backend billing systems do kick in too and further drive the "servers" eating power and spewing heat and whatnot.
So, there you go, that is a carbon footprint of some type. After all, whenever we move a carbon atom from point A to point B there is an equal reaction happening (at least, as in physics).
So, everything is connected. But, we can never create any more carbon in this infinite world. We can definitely move them around in a more beneficial manner that ensure us mere mortals go extinct. Either way, the carbon will still be around.
ARCHIVE
April 20, 2008 - April 26, 2008
April 13, 2008 - April 19, 2008
April 6, 2008 - April 12, 2008
March 30, 2008 - April 5, 2008
March 23, 2008 - March 29, 2008
March 16, 2008 - March 22, 2008
March 9, 2008 - March 15, 2008
February 24, 2008 - March 1, 2008
February 17, 2008 - February 23, 2008
February 10, 2008 - February 16, 2008
February 3, 2008 - February 9, 2008
January 27, 2008 - February 2, 2008
January 20, 2008 - January 26, 2008
January 13, 2008 - January 19, 2008
January 6, 2008 - January 12, 2008
December 30, 2007 - January 5, 2008
December 23, 2007 - December 29, 2007
December 16, 2007 - December 22, 2007
December 9, 2007 - December 15, 2007
December 2, 2007 - December 8, 2007
November 25, 2007 - December 1, 2007
November 18, 2007 - November 24, 2007
November 11, 2007 - November 17, 2007
November 4, 2007 - November 10, 2007
October 28, 2007 - November 3, 2007
October 21, 2007 - October 27, 2007
October 14, 2007 - October 20, 2007
October 7, 2007 - October 13, 2007
September 30, 2007 - October 6, 2007
September 23, 2007 - September 29, 2007
September 16, 2007 - September 22, 2007
September 9, 2007 - September 15, 2007
September 2, 2007 - September 8, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
Obama: Wright is "Wrong" and His Statements Contradict "My Public Life" (23)
James wrote:
Svend,
You could do that but it will only work if you're...
[more]
It's a Boondoggle: the Gas Tax Holiday (2)
mitrebox wrote:
So one must ask Mr Obama which is worse; Pandering to vote...
[more]
John McCain's Miserable Record on Hurricane Katrina (19)
z wrote:
To Eric Ferguson:
"you should pick candidates who support...
[more]
Rev. Wright: A Neverending Cross for Obama To Bear (54)
Dane wrote:
I'm a white 40-something male and I LOVE REV. WRIGHT!!!
H...
[more]
Fox News: Stephen Douglas and Frederick Douglass, What's the Difference? (3)
ananymous wrote:
Wonder what the IQ requirements are to be employed by FOX ...
[more]
Clapping Along With Bush at the White House Correspondents' Dinner (32)
JD wrote:
What is the purpose of this dinner and why does anyone go ...
[more]
Carbon Offsets For Tummy Tucks? (1)
Derik wrote:
ok, I am not science challenged to figure this out. But, I...
[more]
Another Prominent Republican Screwing With the Democrats (5)
sal wrote:
Dan - wtf are you talking about? You're a wreck. Where's y...
[more]
Clinton Stuns With $2.3B in 2009 Earmark Requests (4)
Paul Miller wrote:
Count me in, kirkbrew. Although we're up against a monstr...
[more]
Clinton Smears Obama on Iraq — Again (106)
結婚相 wrote:
thanks nice blog...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


Posted by: Derik on 04/30/08 at 8:46 AM Respond