MOTHER JONES BY E-MAIL

«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»

White House Admits It Is Missing Email Backup Tapes From Start of Iraq War

The White House acknowledged in a court filing last night that it no longer has backup tapes of email from between March 1 and May 22, 2003, a period that includes the beginning of the Iraq war.

Yesterday's filing (PDF) is the latest development in the ongoing White House emails lawsuit, in which two non-profits, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) and the National Security Archive (NSA), are suing to force the administration to recover any missing emails and institute a more effective email archiving system. (For the full story on the missing emails, check out our missing White House emails index.) The filing comes on the heels of several seemingly contradictory statements by administration officials about whether the allegedly missing emails are available on backup tapes. The court had asked the administration to clear up the confusion by clearly stating which backup tapes it does and does not have for the period between March 2003 and October 2005.

In their filing, administration officials claim they have 438 backup tapes for the period between May 23, 2003 and September 29, 2003. The White House stopped its foolish policy of recycling backup tapes in early October 2003, so all the backup tapes made after that date are supposedly preserved—some 60,000 of them. But even the emergency recovery backup tapes the White House does have are far from a fool-proof source for recovering missing emails. Any email that arrived and was deleted in between backups wouldn't be preserved, since backup tapes take a digital "picture" of the data on a drive at a given time. And while that problem applies to all the backups, it's especially concerning for the period between May 23 and September 29, 2003, for which the White House says it has 438 backup tapes. That is a low number of backup tapes per day for an entity as large as the Executive Office of the President, so backups may not have been made for all offices in the EOP on all days during that time. Even if backups were made every day for every component of the EOP, emails could still escape archiving if they were sent, received, and deleted in between backups.

All this doesn't even begin to address the period between March 1 and May 22, for which we now know for certain that no backup tapes exist. In an email to the press earlier today, Meredith Fuchs, the general counsel for the National Security Archive, wrote:

It seems clear now that the e-mail backups are spotty and that there is no guarantee that there are backup tapes for all of EOP during the period of concern, March 2003-October 2005. There are no tapes from earlier than May 23, 2003. So, anything deleted from the EOP network prior to May 23, 2003 (particularly between March 2003 and may 23, 2003) is missing from the back-up tapes.

The plaintiffs are hoping that the judge will issue a ruling forcing the White House to copy email archive .pst files from all sorts of electronic sources, including hard drives and portable devices, in an attempt to insure no more emails go missing. The administration's admission that its backup tape library is incomplete may be the justification the judge needs to do just that. A ruling is expected soon, but Fuchs told me she's worried it will all be for naught. "Here we are two and a half years after they realized there was a problem and they are not in a position to say whether anything is missing or not," Fuchs says. "I honestly think they are just trying to run out the clock, and then it's a huge mess. Maybe the court's going to act quickly and we'll get better preservation. That's what we'll hope for at this point."






Comments

I'm surprised to be the first to comment, because this missing e-mail scandal is huge. It's the biggest of the Bush scandals, which I realize means saying it's bigger than war, torture, or election fraud. I say that because the missing White House e-mail, along with the use of RNC domains for official e-mail, holds evidence for all the other scandals.

except GWB doesn't use email specifically for this reason.

Posted by: dubl on 05/07/08 at 6:27 AM  Respond

HRMM..OKAY FIRST OFF ITS EMAIL, WHICH ISN'T HARD TO SPOOF AND EASIER THEN A POST-IT NOTE TO LOSE. ITS AN ELECTRICAL DOCUMENT AND ONCE DELETED ITS GONE, IF BACKED UP ONCE THE BACKUP TAPES ARE GONE ITS GONE...GET OVER IT THERE IS MORE IMPORTANT THINGS TO USE FUNDS ON.

Posted by: hMM on 05/07/08 at 10:58 AM  Respond

I guess the questions then becomes; why did the White House knowingly break the law and who will hold them accountable?

I don't expect that either will be answered.

Hmm..Yea... This is Watergate in our era.

Posted by: A.Bizzie on 05/08/08 at 6:39 AM  Respond

Post a comment





 

RECENT COMMENTS

Guns Don't Kill People, Irresponsible Gun Dealers Do (5)
John wrote: Guav: "How is he an "irresponsible gun dealer"? Seng-Hui C... [more]

Starbucks' Slutty Mermaid Making Waves (14)
ChaxC wrote: I've quoted it before, and I'll quote it again, because it... [more]

Former NSC Aide on Clinton, 'Dual Containment,' and HRC's 'Obliterate' Iran Remarks (10)
DaveD wrote: "What if they do?" - winston Well and what if they do? It... [more]

A Vote For McCain Validates Bush (5)
DaveD wrote: Honorable? Perhaps at one time, but certainly no longer. H... [more]

'Merchant of Death' Viktor Bout Is Arrested in Thailand (3)
hediye wrote: nice article.Thanks,... [more]

Why Howard Dean's Blood Pressure Is Through the Roof (10)
hediye wrote: Democratic good will?... [more]

Day Three: No Straight Talk from McCain on Parsley's Call for Destroying Islam (7)
hediye wrote: it is really interesting.... [more]

Compromise in Michigan: Another Sign of Things to Come (9)
Kathy Giannini wrote: From what I gather, Clinton can't "catch" Obama even with ... [more]

Superdelegates for Hillary Wavering: A Sign of Things to Come? (2)
Kathy Giannini wrote: Sexism and racism are big sticks to wield in this presiden... [more]

With the Media Seemingly Decided, Clinton Faces Three Options (51)
Star Watcher wrote: Hillary has disgusted me with her comments about how Obama... [more]

XML RSS Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.33

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com

















bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN


This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2008 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS