«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
White House Admits It Is Missing Email Backup Tapes From Start of Iraq War
The White House acknowledged in a court filing last night that it no longer has backup tapes of email from between March 1 and May 22, 2003, a period that includes the beginning of the Iraq war.
Yesterday's filing (PDF) is the latest development in the ongoing White House emails lawsuit, in which two non-profits, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) and the National Security Archive (NSA), are suing to force the administration to recover any missing emails and institute a more effective email archiving system. (For the full story on the missing emails, check out our missing White House emails index.) The filing comes on the heels of several seemingly contradictory statements by administration officials about whether the allegedly missing emails are available on backup tapes. The court had asked the administration to clear up the confusion by clearly stating which backup tapes it does and does not have for the period between March 2003 and October 2005.
In their filing, administration officials claim they have 438 backup tapes for the period between May 23, 2003 and September 29, 2003. The White House stopped its foolish policy of recycling backup tapes in early October 2003, so all the backup tapes made after that date are supposedly preserved—some 60,000 of them. But even the emergency recovery backup tapes the White House does have are far from a fool-proof source for recovering missing emails. Any email that arrived and was deleted in between backups wouldn't be preserved, since backup tapes take a digital "picture" of the data on a drive at a given time. And while that problem applies to all the backups, it's especially concerning for the period between May 23 and September 29, 2003, for which the White House says it has 438 backup tapes. That is a low number of backup tapes per day for an entity as large as the Executive Office of the President, so backups may not have been made for all offices in the EOP on all days during that time. Even if backups were made every day for every component of the EOP, emails could still escape archiving if they were sent, received, and deleted in between backups.
All this doesn't even begin to address the period between March 1 and May 22, for which we now know for certain that no backup tapes exist. In an email to the press earlier today, Meredith Fuchs, the general counsel for the National Security Archive, wrote:
It seems clear now that the e-mail backups are spotty and that there is no guarantee that there are backup tapes for all of EOP during the period of concern, March 2003-October 2005. There are no tapes from earlier than May 23, 2003. So, anything deleted from the EOP network prior to May 23, 2003 (particularly between March 2003 and may 23, 2003) is missing from the back-up tapes.
The plaintiffs are hoping that the judge will issue a ruling forcing the White House to copy email archive .pst files from all sorts of electronic sources, including hard drives and portable devices, in an attempt to insure no more emails go missing. The administration's admission that its backup tape library is incomplete may be the justification the judge needs to do just that. A ruling is expected soon, but Fuchs told me she's worried it will all be for naught. "Here we are two and a half years after they realized there was a problem and they are not in a position to say whether anything is missing or not," Fuchs says. "I honestly think they are just trying to run out the clock, and then it's a huge mess. Maybe the court's going to act quickly and we'll get better preservation. That's what we'll hope for at this point."
Comments
I'm surprised to be the first to comment, because this missing e-mail scandal is huge. It's the biggest of the Bush scandals, which I realize means saying it's bigger than war, torture, or election fraud. I say that because the missing White House e-mail, along with the use of RNC domains for official e-mail, holds evidence for all the other scandals.
except GWB doesn't use email specifically for this reason.
Posted by: dubl on 05/07/08 at 6:27 AM Respond
HRMM..OKAY FIRST OFF ITS EMAIL, WHICH ISN'T HARD TO SPOOF AND EASIER THEN A POST-IT NOTE TO LOSE. ITS AN ELECTRICAL DOCUMENT AND ONCE DELETED ITS GONE, IF BACKED UP ONCE THE BACKUP TAPES ARE GONE ITS GONE...GET OVER IT THERE IS MORE IMPORTANT THINGS TO USE FUNDS ON.
Posted by: hMM on 05/07/08 at 10:58 AM Respond
I guess the questions then becomes; why did the White House knowingly break the law and who will hold them accountable?
I don't expect that either will be answered.
Posted by: chicofaraby on 05/07/08 at 4:44 PM Respond
Hmm..Yea... This is Watergate in our era.
Posted by: A.Bizzie on 05/08/08 at 6:39 AM Respond
ARCHIVE
April 20, 2008 - April 26, 2008
April 13, 2008 - April 19, 2008
April 6, 2008 - April 12, 2008
March 30, 2008 - April 5, 2008
March 23, 2008 - March 29, 2008
March 16, 2008 - March 22, 2008
March 9, 2008 - March 15, 2008
February 24, 2008 - March 1, 2008
February 17, 2008 - February 23, 2008
February 10, 2008 - February 16, 2008
February 3, 2008 - February 9, 2008
January 27, 2008 - February 2, 2008
January 20, 2008 - January 26, 2008
January 13, 2008 - January 19, 2008
January 6, 2008 - January 12, 2008
December 30, 2007 - January 5, 2008
December 23, 2007 - December 29, 2007
December 16, 2007 - December 22, 2007
December 9, 2007 - December 15, 2007
December 2, 2007 - December 8, 2007
November 25, 2007 - December 1, 2007
November 18, 2007 - November 24, 2007
November 11, 2007 - November 17, 2007
November 4, 2007 - November 10, 2007
October 28, 2007 - November 3, 2007
October 21, 2007 - October 27, 2007
October 14, 2007 - October 20, 2007
October 7, 2007 - October 13, 2007
September 30, 2007 - October 6, 2007
September 23, 2007 - September 29, 2007
September 16, 2007 - September 22, 2007
September 9, 2007 - September 15, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
Guns Don't Kill People, Irresponsible Gun Dealers Do (5)
John wrote:
Guav: "How is he an "irresponsible gun dealer"? Seng-Hui C...
[more]
Starbucks' Slutty Mermaid Making Waves (14)
ChaxC wrote:
I've quoted it before, and I'll quote it again, because it...
[more]
Former NSC Aide on Clinton, 'Dual Containment,' and HRC's 'Obliterate' Iran Remarks (10)
DaveD wrote:
"What if they do?" - winston
Well and what if they do? It...
[more]
A Vote For McCain Validates Bush (5)
DaveD wrote:
Honorable? Perhaps at one time, but certainly no longer. H...
[more]
'Merchant of Death' Viktor Bout Is Arrested in Thailand (3)
hediye wrote:
nice article.Thanks,...
[more]
Why Howard Dean's Blood Pressure Is Through the Roof (10)
hediye wrote:
Democratic good will?...
[more]
Day Three: No Straight Talk from McCain on Parsley's Call for Destroying Islam (7)
hediye wrote:
it is really interesting....
[more]
Compromise in Michigan: Another Sign of Things to Come (9)
Kathy Giannini wrote:
From what I gather, Clinton can't "catch" Obama even with ...
[more]
Superdelegates for Hillary Wavering: A Sign of Things to Come? (2)
Kathy Giannini wrote:
Sexism and racism are big sticks to wield in this presiden...
[more]
With the Media Seemingly Decided, Clinton Faces Three Options (51)
Star Watcher wrote:
Hillary has disgusted me with her comments about how Obama...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


Posted by: Eric Ferguson on 05/06/08 at 2:09 PM Respond