«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
Why Democrats Are Promoting Gingrich's Worries Regarding the 2008 Elections
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee--the Democratic Party entity responsible for supporting House candidates--is happy that Newt Gingrich is not happy. On Tuesday, it zapped around a piece that Gingrich wrote for the conservative Human Events magazine, in which he cited the Democrat's recent win in a congressional special election in Louisiana as one helluva warning for the Republican party. Gingrich wrote:
Saturday's loss was in a district that President Bush carried by 19 percentage points in 2004 and that the Republicans have held since 1975.
This defeat follows on the loss of Speaker Hastert's seat in Illinois. That seat had been held by a Republican for 76 years with the single exception of the 1974 Watergate election when the Democrats held it for one term. That same seat had been carried by President Bush 55-44% in 2004.
Gingrich notes that congressional Democrats lead congressional Republicans in generic polling by 18 points nowadays, "reminiscent of the depths of the Watergate disaster." And bashing Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton ain't gonna help the GOPers running for House and Senate seats:
The Republican brand has been so badly damaged that if Republicans try to run an anti-Obama, anti-Reverend Wright, or (if Senator Clinton wins), anti-Clinton campaign, they are simply going to fail.
This model has already been tested with disastrous results.
In 2006, there were six incumbent Republican Senators who had plenty of money, the advantage of incumbency, and traditionally successful consultants.
But the voters in all six states had adopted a simple position: "Not you." No matter what the GOP Senators attacked their opponents with, the voters shrugged off the attacks and returned to, "Not you."
So with congressional Republicans facing a possible "catastrophic election this fall," what's a GOPer to do? They must, Gingrich declares, "chart a bold course of real change." What would that "real change" entail? Gingrich has a list of nine items, including a gas tax holiday (isn't that old news already?), a moratorium on earmarks (which individually can be quite popular back home in the district), cutting the budget of the Census Bureau (an issue on the mind of so many Americans), implementing a spaced-based GPS-style air traffic control system (a good idea, or Beam me up, Scotty?), declare English the official language of government (which will surely help the party with Hispanic voters), and "remind Americans that judges matter" (for, obviously, most Americans have forgotten that).
Well, let's just say that Gingrich is better on the diagnosis than on the prescription. Which is why Democratic political operatives are delightfully promoting his worries about the upcoming election.
Comments
I wonder what Newt thinks about Giraffe hunting these days?
lol
Part of the reason that Republicans lost Illinois 14th is because of the guy they put up - Jim Oberweis. The guy has run for everything from gov, senate, house and even county chair - lost every election. I think that this was the 7th election that he lost.
Not that even the "conservative" Il 14th isn't totally pissed with the pseudo-conservative platform, but personality had a lot to do with this loss.
Posted by: kirkbrew on 05/06/08 at 12:34 PM Respond
What a clown.
Posted by: Reynaldo on 05/06/08 at 1:00 PM Respond
Well, Newt did give us "Had enough?" as a slogan for 2006. His solutions might suck, but he does see the political landscape clearly. He'll twist things like any Republican to promote a point of view, but he has a history of being clear in his analysis, and his assertions regarding polling data jibe with what I've read elsewhere. I could nitpick and say that the two special election Democratic wins were significantly due to local factors like weak Republican candidates, but when the GOP loses in the opinion polls not just on the usual domestic issues but on national security too, they are in trouble. Frankly, if there was ever a time to hit them where their strength is, it's now.
Posted by: Eric Ferguson on 05/06/08 at 3:03 PM Respond
Why does Newt even matter? He is a washed up has been liar and adulterer(sp?). Why the so-called liberal media even gives this guy the time of day is beyond me...
Posted by: Mike on 05/06/08 at 10:19 PM Respond
ARCHIVE
April 20, 2008 - April 26, 2008
April 13, 2008 - April 19, 2008
April 6, 2008 - April 12, 2008
March 30, 2008 - April 5, 2008
March 23, 2008 - March 29, 2008
March 16, 2008 - March 22, 2008
March 9, 2008 - March 15, 2008
February 24, 2008 - March 1, 2008
February 17, 2008 - February 23, 2008
February 10, 2008 - February 16, 2008
February 3, 2008 - February 9, 2008
January 27, 2008 - February 2, 2008
January 20, 2008 - January 26, 2008
January 13, 2008 - January 19, 2008
January 6, 2008 - January 12, 2008
December 30, 2007 - January 5, 2008
December 23, 2007 - December 29, 2007
December 16, 2007 - December 22, 2007
December 9, 2007 - December 15, 2007
December 2, 2007 - December 8, 2007
November 25, 2007 - December 1, 2007
November 18, 2007 - November 24, 2007
November 11, 2007 - November 17, 2007
November 4, 2007 - November 10, 2007
October 28, 2007 - November 3, 2007
October 21, 2007 - October 27, 2007
October 14, 2007 - October 20, 2007
October 7, 2007 - October 13, 2007
September 30, 2007 - October 6, 2007
September 23, 2007 - September 29, 2007
September 16, 2007 - September 22, 2007
September 9, 2007 - September 15, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
Why Democrats Are Promoting Gingrich's Worries Regarding the 2008 Elections (5)
Mike wrote:
Why does Newt even matter? He is a washed up has been lia...
[more]
Another Example of Why You Can't Trust the Right on Politics of the Left (6)
Michael Z. wrote:
Maybe you should stop trolling and prepare to start crying...
[more]
The Effect of Shifting Expectations (2)
Michael Z. wrote:
He never asked for that you dirty troll....
[more]
Clinton Continuing On... For Now (1)
capt - Hussein wrote:
Looks like IN by 4 without Gary. Less than 4 is doomsday. ...
[more]
Know Your Enemy: Heather Mac Donald (12)
Bill Nigh wrote:
mr paul,
Dude, you just can't handle the truth, can yo...
[more]
The Clinton War on Economists Continues (5)
Michael Z. wrote:
Ah the stench of hypocrisy when comparing Clinton campaign...
[more]
Happy 60th. Sorry About That Indictment. (3)
Rowan Berkeley wrote:
"Fevered speculation aside, Olmert could very well come ou...
[more]
Why Payday Loans Are Better Than Indentured Servitude (6)
Tracey wrote:
I totally agree with you. We are an actual payday loan co...
[more]
NC for Obama, Indiana Undeclared; Let's Look at the Exits (2)
Matt wrote:
I wish HRC would look at the exit....
[more]
Obama vs. Clinton on Social Security: An Actual Policy Difference! (8)
Mpearson wrote:
Bruce,
Your link doesn't take me directly to the fact sh...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


Posted by: capt - Hussein on 05/06/08 at 11:44 AM Respond