«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
NC for Obama, Indiana Undeclared; Let's Look at the Exits
If you're following the primary tonight, you've probably seen the news on TV: Obama has won North Carolina, in what appears to be a decisive victory, and Indiana is too close to call.
Here's what the exits are saying. In North Carolina, Clinton won white women 64-32 and white men 54-40. In Indiana, she won white women 61-39 and white men 58-41. Those numbers are roughly equivalent, and would suggest that the results from both states ought to be the same. The reason they likely will not be? The size of the black population. In North Carolina, blacks are 33 percent of the vote. In Indiana, they're just 15. In both states, they went for Obama by over 90 percent. The takeaway: racial voting blocks acted in consistent fashion across states today; it was their size that made the difference.
Comparing today's numbers to Ohio's should give us a fair sense of how the race has changed since March 4. In the Buckeye State, Clinton won white women 67-31 and white men 58-39. That means that Obama is doing slightly better nowadays with white women and roughly the same with white men. It's hard to read too much into these numbers, because the differences in question are probably just barely outside the margin of error, if they are at all. That said, the fact that Obama is doing as well with white voters as he did before the Reverend Wright situation really took off (he may even be doing slightly better!) is a sign of good things for Obama.
In both NC and IN, Obama won voters under 45 and Clinton won voters over 60. The middle-aged folks, though, were more volatile. In NC, the 45-60 age group went for Obama. In IN, it went for Clinton.
Income was not a useful metric today. In NC, Obama won voters who make less than $50,000 a year, as well as those who make more than that. In IN, Clinton won both groups.
Obama was also aided by college graduates today. In NC, a college education didn't matter much: Obama won those with college degrees 56-42 and won those without 55-40. But IN, it did matter: Obama won those with college degrees 56-44 and lost those without 44-56.
Obama is now speaking in North Carolina, by the way. He just said, "Tonight we stand less than 200 delegates away from securing the democratic nomination." Interestingly, he congratulated Clinton on her victory in Indiana, even though none of the networks have called it for her yet. He's also emphasizing that even though there are some "hurt feelings" on both sides of the Democratic race, the party will come together behind its principles and convictions in the fall. "This fall we intend to march forward as a unified Democratic Party." Is someone trying to play the role of the nominee?
By the way, need any more proof that this is a "change" election? When asked which "candidate qualities mattered most" when selecting who to vote for, 50 percent of respondents in both states said "can bring about needed change." By contrast, "cares about people like me" was most important to 15 percent of respondents; "has the right experience" was most important to 21-23 percent; and "has the best chance to win in November" was most important to just 9-10 percent.
And as Obama finishes up, he throws in one more dig at John McCain: "His plans for the future... are nothing more than the failed policies of the past." And he doesn't let Clinton off the hook, either. He says that Democrats know that Republicans will use attacks and smears in their campaign against either Hillary Clinton or himself. The only open question is what kind of campaign the Democrats will run against the Republicans. Will they "duplicate the same tactics and strategies of the other side" or will they choose instead to "tell the truth?"
On CNN, they're calling it the "first speech of the general election" and an "acceptance speech." Hard to disagree. The only problem is that Hillary Clinton isn't likely to go away after today; in fact, the Clintons get better when their backs get up against the wall.
Comments
These trends from partial results are very interesting. I've noted them to compare with final figures.
I wish HRC would look at the exit.
Posted by: Matt on 05/06/08 at 6:57 PM Respond
ARCHIVE
April 20, 2008 - April 26, 2008
April 13, 2008 - April 19, 2008
April 6, 2008 - April 12, 2008
March 30, 2008 - April 5, 2008
March 23, 2008 - March 29, 2008
March 16, 2008 - March 22, 2008
March 9, 2008 - March 15, 2008
February 24, 2008 - March 1, 2008
February 17, 2008 - February 23, 2008
February 10, 2008 - February 16, 2008
February 3, 2008 - February 9, 2008
January 27, 2008 - February 2, 2008
January 20, 2008 - January 26, 2008
January 13, 2008 - January 19, 2008
January 6, 2008 - January 12, 2008
December 30, 2007 - January 5, 2008
December 23, 2007 - December 29, 2007
December 16, 2007 - December 22, 2007
December 9, 2007 - December 15, 2007
December 2, 2007 - December 8, 2007
November 25, 2007 - December 1, 2007
November 18, 2007 - November 24, 2007
November 11, 2007 - November 17, 2007
November 4, 2007 - November 10, 2007
October 28, 2007 - November 3, 2007
October 21, 2007 - October 27, 2007
October 14, 2007 - October 20, 2007
October 7, 2007 - October 13, 2007
September 30, 2007 - October 6, 2007
September 23, 2007 - September 29, 2007
September 16, 2007 - September 22, 2007
September 9, 2007 - September 15, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
The Effect of Shifting Expectations (2)
Michael Z. wrote:
He never asked for that you dirty troll....
[more]
Clinton Continuing On... For Now (1)
capt - Hussein wrote:
Looks like IN by 4 without Gary. Less than 4 is doomsday. ...
[more]
Know Your Enemy: Heather Mac Donald (12)
Bill Nigh wrote:
mr paul,
Dude, you just can't handle the truth, can yo...
[more]
The Clinton War on Economists Continues (5)
Michael Z. wrote:
Ah the stench of hypocrisy when comparing Clinton campaign...
[more]
Happy 60th. Sorry About That Indictment. (3)
Rowan Berkeley wrote:
"Fevered speculation aside, Olmert could very well come ou...
[more]
Why Payday Loans Are Better Than Indentured Servitude (6)
Tracey wrote:
I totally agree with you. We are an actual payday loan co...
[more]
NC for Obama, Indiana Undeclared; Let's Look at the Exits (2)
Matt wrote:
I wish HRC would look at the exit....
[more]
Obama vs. Clinton on Social Security: An Actual Policy Difference! (8)
Mpearson wrote:
Bruce,
Your link doesn't take me directly to the fact sh...
[more]
Another Example of Why You Can't Trust the Right on Politics of the Left (5)
Bill Nigh wrote:
mr kirkbrew,
I think you have it a little low on the...
[more]
Politics, Pandering, and Policy at the Pump: Who Wins? (48)
just call me....roy wrote:
Oh yeah, almost forgot one thing. And as always there wil...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


Posted by: kathy giannini on 05/06/08 at 6:15 PM Respond