«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
Some Surprising New Findings on GIs, PTSD, and Crime
A while back, I waxed all sympathetic about GIs getting what I assumed was all too needed special consideration for post-discharge, surely PTSD-based offenses. Now comes a Sacramento Bee year-long study of GI's, 'shell shock', and crime. As usual, it's far from a simple situation.
Read their findings here, here, here, and here.
Turns out that some of these supposedly-traumatized-by-war defendants had a 'war or jail' option, with serious charges hanging over their heads, and appear to have taken their criminal dispositions to war with them. Some of these folks had colorful rap sheets long before they ever donned combat boots. Of course, as Kathy Griffin would say: allegedly.
Surely, the programs I praised earlier are taking such factors into consideration in deciding how to deal with these vet offenders, but damn this makes things murky.
Kudos to prison shrink and columnist John Schwade for the hat tip.
Comments
When I was in basic back in 71, we had a lot of guys claiming to have been given the army or jail choice. Most of us just assumed they either wanted to be looked on as badasses or were trying to pretend they had no other choice but to be there. I also met men who joined just to find out what it's like to kill somebody. You get all kinds, and it doesn't look to me like the percentage of prior bad eggs is really any greater than in the population at large, and maybe even less. In a lot of cases, it's kids who grow up straight A students with no history of troubles who end up with PTSD from participating in horrendous actions their first time away from home under a command structure that seems to be an excuse for amoral idiots to run amuck. And that goes all the way to the top. It didn't take me long to find out why my dad, a lifer with tours in Korea and Nam, told me that the army I was getting into disgusted him, and was nothing like the army he had been proud to serve. So sure, some of these guys aren't the cream of the crop, but if the government's going to keep on torturing people and invading countries for no good reason, it's going to need some thugs.
If they serve they earned treatment for what ails them.
Period.
Pre-existing conditions, mental, physical, legal problems or arrest history are all considered BEFORE they serve.
If the military accepts their service and they serve with honor - there is no other meaningful measure.
To try to discount their service is despicable.
Shame on you.
Posted by: capt on 07/28/08 at 4:19 AM Respond
Capt is absolutely right...I think we should knock out the walls between two cells and give them more room. Perhals privacy curtains across thier cell doors. A criminal, is a criminal, is a criminal; notwithstanding, prior or current military service. I do believe they deserve the same final judgement as anyone person who kills another, albeit, in the name of god, country or apple pie )or what ever your vice).
Posted by: MEJ on 07/28/08 at 5:42 AM Respond
So you liberate a country from a criminal dictator utilising - some - criminals who are now soldiers...
Capt portrays a romantic picture of men who've paid their dues to society and return with a clear conscience - the reports suggest this isn't quite the case; these thugs come home to commit more crime.
Posted by: Fair Trade on 07/28/08 at 2:02 PM Respond
The DoD policy, abetted by Congress, of actively recruiting convicted felons & other criminals, psychiatric patients, and social malcontents is absurd when viewed in comparison with our policy of excluding and discharging gay & lesbian military servicemembers. Gays have served in armies since ancient Greece, and have been noted as fierce warriors. They serve in uniform in most of our allies, including NATO forces and the superior British & Israeli forces. We're reaping what we have sewn.
Posted by: bob zuley on 07/28/08 at 5:46 PM Respond
I remember when I was fresh out of high school, the Viet Nam war was still going strong. Quite a few of my classmates who were busted for minor pot charges and the like, were also given the choice to go to war or jail. I don't believe any of them where chrged with a serious or violent crime.
Then again, they had a draft then. So war was inevitable.
Sorry to say, but if McShame gets in the W.H., he probably will bring back the draft.
Posted by: mary beaulieu on 07/29/08 at 8:25 AM Respond
Serving in 67 68 in the Nam' I was not given a choice and was drafted. It did not influence how I conducted myself and carried out my duty. Call it murder, call whatever the F**** you want. We did what we had to in a split second decision. Killed some that didn't need to be killed and still suffer with the demons of PTSD and have been since the 70's. Now as outpatient at the VA Northport. If you haven't walked in my shoes shut the Fu*** up. I may troubled and have my problems however, I'm still alive and so are my fellow combat veterans. Don't like war than stop invading countries that are nothing but a f***** lie. War Sucks, ask anyone who's been in one.
Posted by: Bob DiLorenzo on 08/02/08 at 9:05 AM Respond
ARCHIVE
November 9, 2008 - November 15, 2008
November 2, 2008 - November 8, 2008
October 26, 2008 - November 1, 2008
October 19, 2008 - October 25, 2008
October 12, 2008 - October 18, 2008
October 5, 2008 - October 11, 2008
September 28, 2008 - October 4, 2008
September 21, 2008 - September 27, 2008
September 14, 2008 - September 20, 2008
September 7, 2008 - September 13, 2008
August 31, 2008 - September 6, 2008
August 24, 2008 - August 30, 2008
August 17, 2008 - August 23, 2008
August 10, 2008 - August 16, 2008
August 3, 2008 - August 9, 2008
July 27, 2008 - August 2, 2008
April 20, 2008 - April 26, 2008
April 13, 2008 - April 19, 2008
April 6, 2008 - April 12, 2008
March 30, 2008 - April 5, 2008
March 23, 2008 - March 29, 2008
March 16, 2008 - March 22, 2008
RECENT COMMENTS
Wanna Work for Obama? Prepare for a Strip Search (1)
Paul Miller wrote:
Debra, I really appreciate your posts and I've read enoug...
[more]
Public School For the Obama Girls, Please? (113)
bcos wrote:
IMO using the Obama children to make a political point is ...
[more]
Hedge Fund Managers To Congress: Go Ahead, Regulate Us (3)
John wrote:
Brilliant and cogent criticism, Phillip. This sort of comm...
[more]
Court Smacks Down Bush Administration in White House Emails Case (12)
Dick Day wrote:
Does this mean that the Bush Administration has erased all...
[more]
I Was Right to Worry About Black Homophobia (58)
Paul Miller wrote:
Jason and many others who've made a similar point are righ...
[more]
Mormon Church GOTV for Prop 8: "Do All You Can" (106)
Patrick Henry wrote:
Brother Wiggins:
You gave us a sequence of historical eve...
[more]
Responding to Obama's Win, Michael (Son of) Reagan Says, Go After Dems on Sex (47)
Bob wrote:
Tell the son-of-the-guy who raised my taxes 7 times to goo...
[more]
Does That Make McCain Emperor Palpatine? (3)
Paul Miller wrote:
A Handmaiden's Tale was such a creepy book. No doubt tha...
[more]
David Plouffe For Democratic Party Chief? (17)
Alice wrote:
Oh dear god NO!! NOT David Plouffe! The D.N.C. needs someo...
[more]
Report: Rove Talks "Fairly Regularly" With McCain Camp; Getting Six Figures From Freedom's Watch (15)
Alice wrote:
Alot of things have "rove" written all over them. Like the...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


Posted by: smitisan on 07/26/08 at 9:22 AM Respond