«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
Investigative Reporters Head to Alaska...And When Will Sarah Palin Meet the Press?

Alaska's getting pretty crowded...with investigative reporters and scandal-chasers. Last night, at receptions, hotel bars, and restaurants, journalists covering the Gustav-delayed Republican convention were chewing on nothing but the Sarah Palin soap opera and discussing which reporters had been deployed to the northernmost state to dig for more dirt on John McCain's not-so-vetted running-mate. What might be most frightening for the McCain camp is that the National Enquirer reportedly has dispatched a scandal SWAT team to Alaska. Given the tabloid's success with the John Edwards scoop (and its ability to pay cash for tips and information), should Palin fans be biting their nails?
It is, of course, possible for Palin to rise above all the recent unpleasantness by wowing the convention--and the viewing public--with a heckuva speech on Wednesday night. It will probably be the most anticipated vice presidential acceptance speech in decades. But there will still be another ritual for Palin to go through: her first press conference with the national media.
In past elections, controversial veep picks have not fared well during these coming-out sessions. In 1992, Dan Quayle raised more doubts about himself after his first grilling by the national press. In 1984, Geraldine Ferraro flopped during a press conference that focused on her husband's controversial business dealings.
As governor of Alaska, Palin has been quite accessible to the Alaskan media. But since McCain selected her, she has not. And the question is how soon after her acceptance speech will the McCain campaign make her available for questions. (And the questions ought to not focus on only the baby stuff; there's the investigation into whether she improperly applied to get her former brother-in-law fired as a state trooper, there's her connections to the Alaska Independence Party, which advocates Alaska's secession from the United States, there's her experience--or inexperience--in foreign policy, and much more.) Will the campaign let the media question her right after the convention? Or does it want to put this obligatory exercise off for longer?
On Monday night, I encountered Mark Salter, a top McCain adviser, outside the St. Paul Hotel, and I asked him when Palin's first press conference would be. He did not seem eager to talk about it. "After the convention," he said. Soon after the convention? "After," he repeated. Whenever it occurs, it will be some session.
Photo by Ryan McFarland used under a Creative Commons license.
Comments
"It is, of course, possible for Palin to rise above all the recent unpleasantness by wowing the convention--and the viewing public--with a heckuva speech on Wednesday night. "
That kinda depends on IF people even watch it? Then suppose the ratings are huge, that could be because of Obama supporters curiousity more than McCain/Palin support?
Just sayin'
Good piece.
Thanks!
Is she wearing a fur?
Where is PETA and why hasn't someone been dispatched to throw red paint on her?
A real outdoorsman she is, an oil drillin', shootin' wolves from planes sportsman and an environmentally conscious steward, who doesn't believe in global warming because that might get in the way of her fundamental beliefs.
Does that about cover it?
Posted by: elemental jim on 09/02/08 at 10:39 AM Respond
"In past elections, controversial veep picks have not fared well during these coming-out sessions."
You forget that these days the MSM just reads the questions that Bush/McCain writes for them.
Posted by: disdaniel on 09/02/08 at 11:59 AM Respond
Why did McCain pick the unknown Sarah Palin as his running mate? Was it to get the disgruntled Hillary votes? If so, that won't work because Palin's politics are the exact opposite of Hillary's politics. What kind of Hillary supporter could embrace Palin?
Did McCain pick Palin to shore up the conservative vote? If so, that's a questionable plan, especially since Palin wasn't properly vetted and already has enough political baggage to curtail undecided voters from jumping on the McCain bandwagon.
It certainly wasn't Palin's popularity that sparked McCain to pick her. Nobody outside Alaska had ever heard of her 2 weeks ago.
Or was it simply to say, "Hey look! I've got a woman Veep! See how progressive I am!" Naa, that won't work because everyone knows McCain isn't progressive. Besides, that strategy didn't work with Geraldine in '84. It's just not enough to get fresh votes.
Is it possible that McCain, a 72 year old 4-time cancer survivor thought that Sarah Palin would make a good president should anything happen to him? And if HE thought that, did he assume that we would too? And if so, doesn't that speak volumes about McCain's judgement?
Mr. McCain would have better off with Mitt. Shoulda, coulda, woulda...
Posted by: MacDuck on 09/02/08 at 12:12 PM Respond
I cannot still believe that Mccain is seriously going to pick this woman on his ticket. What kind of example is that for the GOP's crusade for Family Values? What values? James Dobson didn't want a Morman, Mitt Romney on his ticket, but the Focus on the family Superstar will probably now have a change of heart. How can Palin though not look like a hypocrite when she supports abstinance programs, when she can't even control her own daughter's sexual habits. This pick will give progressive sceptics like many of the readers of this magizine a chance to show we have values too. Obama and Biden show it and have demonstrated their integrity in this campaign, and I think that will come across to the American people this Fall.
Posted by: Dave Farley on 09/02/08 at 1:15 PM Respond
Yeah, more than lucky the fur coat comes from an endangered species. So much for being a good steward of the environment; she supports on shore drilling as well in Alaska that could exterminate thousands of wildlife species. To all you animal rights activists out there, it is time to get out there and fight. It doesn't matter if we are pro life or pro choice, if we have no respect for God's creation.
Posted by: Dave Farley on 09/02/08 at 1:19 PM Respond
Look at the clothing on the people behind her on the bleachers. Either this was taken at some kind of costume event, or Alaska is way weirder than I thought.
It still sucks if it's real fur, though.
Posted by: Karenna on 09/02/08 at 1:40 PM Respond
This is a good question: "Why did McCain pick the unknown Sarah Palin as his running mate?" I read that McCain met Palin last April. Didn't Sarah Palin give birth last April? Who introduced her to the presumptive nominee? Why did others say McCain couldn't have Lierberman on the ticket? Why did the "independent maverick" listen to them?
Posted by: Lorijen on 09/02/08 at 1:56 PM Respond
Let`s not linger on what has already been said about this
McCain-Palin-GOP ticket,here are some basic suggestions for both of them as to save this upcoming "Comedy Road Show".
John McCain should stop using this boring,silly :"My Friends" when starting a speech,worse when combining it with " let me tell you " ....seriously.
Reason:his phrase is typically
used in someones High School
time "after getting laid for
the first time" and then only
as to "acclaim the obvious " !
And as for Palin,who according
to various sources,has zero
experiences in foreign affairs
except being told "that Alaska
is next door to Russia",this
advise:gain some experience by
learning that there is in fact "some distinct difference between (Vladimir) Putin, the
Russian Minister and the quite
familiar "Put in",that she has
shown so well by "putting out"
some five (5) children !
McCain : but my Friends......
Posted by: Concernd Voter on 09/02/08 at 2:48 PM Respond
When will Sarah Palin meet the press??? Boy is that a legitimate, but loaded question!! If she has an ounce of respect for her family and herself, she will not accept the nomination and bow out gracefully. Being the pious, self-absorbed, fundamentalist twit that she is though, she won't.
Hypocrits, regardless of what political party, sexual inclination, or even their good intentions, deserve every moment under the magnifying glass they get.
Posted by: buzzbike on 09/02/08 at 3:37 PM Respond
Given the successive passes Obama got on his hate-America preacher as well as his dubious ties with Ayers and Rezko, I think the American public will be able to get past the fact that Palin's daughter is going to have a baby. She has already scored points by attracting attention to the sexist content of some blogs. She'll be able to capitalize on all of the resentment women feel at Hillary's not getting the nomination PLUS capitalize on all the crap we were fed about experience counting less than judgment at the beginning of Obama's campaign.
It reminds me of certain card games where to win you have to get rid of your cards. Obama's cards are coming back at him one after another and Palin is getting to play off of them.
Posted by: Kathy Giannini on 09/02/08 at 4:12 PM Respond
Has anyone looked into what the age difference is between Bristol Palin at the time of impregnation and the supposed father? If Governor Palin stands for law and order shouldn't she be seeking charges against him for statutory rape or contributing to the delinquency of a minor?
Posted by: Mark Farmer on 09/02/08 at 6:21 PM Respond
How did she know that the baby would not demand a lot of attention when she agreed to participate in the race? Giving birth at 44 is quite risky. What is known from her adventure on the eve of labor, when she took an 11 hour-long travel from Dallas back to Alaska to see her non-obstetrician doctor, looks as either she did not care for the life of the newborn or she was lying about the pregnancy.
Posted by: Maria on 09/02/08 at 6:24 PM Respond
"Obama's cards are coming back at him one after another and Palin is getting to play off of them."
Huh? This makes no sense. What cards of Obama's are you referring to, and how is Sarah "Eagleton '08" Palin playing off of them?
Posted by: Tata Toothy on 09/02/08 at 7:29 PM Respond
Palin has used lobbyist to get pork for her little town in Alaska and even had the lobbyist that work for Senator Stephens. That is a reformer? Oh, how about that fur she wears? Environmentalists and animals activist are you seeing this! And then there is Experience. Some school districts in Texas are twice the size of the number of people in Alaska. Give me a Break!
Posted by: lucero1946 on 09/02/08 at 8:59 PM Respond
Has anyone looked into what the age difference is between Bristol Palin at the time of impregnation and the supposed father?
I think it's a bit less than that between Obama's parents. His mother was also 17 and was pregnant when they married. I suspect that has something to do with his reticence,.
Posted by: MIke on 09/02/08 at 9:57 PM Respond
Wow, this women supported the independence of Alaska. No way average Americans will vote for McCain now.
Posted by: Seth on 09/02/08 at 10:11 PM Respond
The Maverick Party is here! (but don't ask any questions...)
Posted by: chris on 09/03/08 at 3:33 AM Respond
"What kind of Hillary supporter could embrace Palin?"
The same kind that swears to vote for McCain rather than Obama. The kind who doesn't really care about the consequences.
Posted by: DaveD on 09/03/08 at 5:07 AM Respond
Help me understand why anyone would be impressed if she delivers a good speech Wednesday night. She has a journalism degree and is a former sportscaster. She almost certainly did not write the speech herself.
So, what's the accomplishment? She didn't choke?
Posted by: BH on 09/03/08 at 7:14 AM Respond
My friens, I can't shtand her voish.
Posted by: ed on 09/03/08 at 7:28 AM Respond
The age of consent in Alaska is 16. Bristol is said to be 17. However, that claim should be checked out. Since the Palin children were supposedly home schooled, does she have school records which would give her age or is it in the county Birth records? Say, if she is sixteen she could have become pregnant when she was fifteen which would then be statutory rape and a felony.
Posted by: eliduc on 09/03/08 at 8:51 AM Respond
I was really excited about Mr. McCain's vice presidential pick until I realized that he had not chosen the intelligent and witty Michael Palin, but some woman named Sarah Palin. No relation, I guess.
Posted by: broo on 09/03/08 at 3:07 PM Respond
buzzbike,
Apparently the media will never meet Sarah Palin. It's official; the McCain campaign has requested that all inquiries about his veep be funnelled through them. Funny, I was under the impression we believed in free speech and free thought.
Posted by: Lyssa Barnes on 09/03/08 at 4:38 PM Respond
One needs only an IQ of 37 on a clear day to see that comments on the candidacy of Gov. Sarah Palin are as inapropriate as they are ignorant. But what has common courtesy to do with those who heap abuse and scorn on a woman they do not know, those who view the world from the passenger seat of a moving car?
Posted by: V. Fine on 09/03/08 at 4:57 PM Respond
For those fired up about her wearing fur please look a little further into it... Click on the photographer's name in the article (mine) and you 'll get a better picture of the story behind the photo. It is real fur...
Posted by: Ryan on 09/03/08 at 5:06 PM Respond
It has been evident for some time that after,(who said Bitch here)reckless,overly ambitious and foolish silly Hillary, was losing her nomination for president,hat those Repugs were going to seek and exploit Hillary`s " blind and stubborn feministic base" for the quite obvious.
Should these very same Hillary supporters actually going to betray and turn against their own party...
according to and in line with the before mentioned "just for sake of those "I'm tough, I'm ambitious, and I know exactly what I want. If that makes me a bitch, okay. ~Madonna Ciccone.....now that would give
indeed stupidity and ignorance additional dimensions.
As we all know by now,Palin got picked solely based that she will "hopefully" appeal to the Republican’s conservative base....and frankly,because for being a woman and Washington,DC outsider,according to the GOP
Nobody in his right mind,not even this senile,old
hypocrite McCain(who never ever spoke a word to her)
would have made her"the VP #1 Choice" as he had said,
but because of sheer "political purposes" the RNC-
Manipulators themselves picked that woman. Period.
And again,in fairness to that woman and the rest of those women who are the feministic base out there,it
would be foolish to believe that her choosing is that
of a concept of "equality between the sexes " ......
not at all,sorry to say that,Ladies ! It all came down to these very same " cheaters,womanizers and plain male chauvinistic pigs" in need for someone other than themselves,that those " morally unsuited unqualified bloody hypocrites"( who would have never,ever considered of selecting any woman in the first place)thought of this slick,dirty scheme and so they were plotting as they usual do,and went for this "I'm tough, I'm ambitious, and I know exactly what I want. If that makes me a bitch" kind of woman,in such a despicable act,that makes one vomit in disgust !
It would not come a a total surprise that during next several weeks we`ll find out her obvious lack of some real needed qualifications for being VP-material,but that she has rather been chosen for the convenience of some political slimy,sleazy calculations ......and the shameless exploitation of an ambitious,but yet naive,foolish woman.....who was morally raped by those very same men,she more or less trusted !!!
Posted by: Carlos on 09/03/08 at 9:09 PM Respond
I have one question!! When will Sarah Palin be talking with the national media about real issues?
The republicans really don't want her to speak. They want her to be the puppet dog. Speak when we say speak!! And no questions asked!! NOT!!
Posted by: Dana from Chi on 09/04/08 at 10:40 AM Respond
She will never meet the Press. The Press will ask a lot of questions. Like, Alaska seceding from the Union, pork barrel for a small city in Alaska, working with Ted Stephens lobbyists, banning books without authority, abuse of her powers without due process, and environmental insensitivity. The Republicans will protect her from the Press or make sure that the questions are screened and come from friendly reporters.
Posted by: lucero1946 on 09/04/08 at 11:37 AM Respond
There are so many hypocritical issues about this woman. However, the most dangerous is her end-times biblical ideology. Why isn't the corporate media slamming her and playing her minister's and her own words about Iraq being a mission from God, etc. (Why isn't it being put on a loop like Rev. Wright's sermon, played and played again and again).
You know, in a 1980's interview between the neo-con traitor Robert Novak and musician Frank Zappa...Novak scoffed at Zappa when the later talked about this country moving toward a fascist theocracy....Well folks....Whadda ya think, huh?
Posted by: Janet Gaudiello on 09/06/08 at 10:39 AM Respond
The media unjustly attacked Sarah Palin through her family and by unsubstantiated lies and innuendo. The left-wing media naturally subjectively attacks conservatives just as a matter of course. Any legitimate objective journalist (of which there are very few) would withhold open support and defense of her BECAUSE of their objectiveness. And there is certainly no support or defense for her at this site - there's not even any semblance of giving her the benefit of any doubt. These postings merely reflect last week's media attacks. So, the only one who can defend Sarah Palin is herself and the McCain campaign.
As many of the comments posted here are reflections of the media bias, it stands to reason that during any interview, there will be no objectiveness given toward Sarah Palin, simply because she is a conservative.
Many in the media are not any different than many of the posters here - they're just more "sophisticated" about how they twist comments and fabricate opinion.
Posted by: Rick from OK on 09/06/08 at 5:18 PM Respond
"morally raped"...WOW! Is there a definition for that in the dictionary, or Wikipedia? The last I remember learning is that to be president of the United States, one must be a natural born citizen and 35 years of age. It is the same for the vice president. Man, what a dirty trick that was, I mean picking someone with those very qualifications! May he rot in hell.
Posted by: Jimmy on 09/08/08 at 8:59 AM Respond
In the words of Sarah Palin when asked if she felt ready for the job of VP, (by People magazine) Yup, yup. We do expect her to talk to the national press. This is part of the election process, having the press disect a candidates life and (most importantly)their political views and intelligence. EVERY candidate has been through this and there is no reason that Sarah Palin should be treated any differently. Let her go on FOX news with Bill O'Reilly (Obama did this). She cannot expect to be a part of national politics and miss out on the vetting of the press and the populace for which they work. Even if you love this woman's story, you must admit the treatment from the press is the same as it's been for all major candidates. As Americans it is our expectation to hear from our political candidates in our media, not just scripted speeches.
Posted by: Barbara on 09/09/08 at 4:01 PM Respond
It's absolutely amazing how moronic and mentally handicapped you leftist swine are. You all have NO IDEA what reality is. Unless reality to you is a minimum wage job waiting around for false "hope, and change" or the government to come bail you out and pay for your healthcare, retirement, food and other expenses so you can be more "equal" to your wealthier counterparts in society. Get a life and a good job and STOP DREAMING ABOUT A MAKE BELEIVE SOCIETY WHERE WE ARE ALL EQUAL BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT SAYS WE HAVE TO BE. Geez does that sound like someone from the old Russian regime? Why dont you look at the records of your savior and his sidekick and see if they REALLY are for "hope and change"?! They are PIGS just like the rest of the politicians!!
Posted by: BT on 09/19/08 at 8:28 AM Respond
You know, BT, the simple fact that most of us are posting from work implies that we are not stuck in minimum wage jobs. Instead we recognize those around us who are stuck because of the unparalleled greed of those at the very top.
I should have stopped reading as soon as I saw that you think it's in good taste to refer to a person as "mentally handicapped" because of their political views. I hope I'm not insulting any selfish bigots when I say that you sir are a selfish bigot.
Posted by: anon on 10/16/08 at 10:26 AM Respond
ARCHIVE
November 9, 2008 - November 15, 2008
November 2, 2008 - November 8, 2008
October 26, 2008 - November 1, 2008
October 19, 2008 - October 25, 2008
October 12, 2008 - October 18, 2008
October 5, 2008 - October 11, 2008
September 28, 2008 - October 4, 2008
September 21, 2008 - September 27, 2008
September 14, 2008 - September 20, 2008
September 7, 2008 - September 13, 2008
August 31, 2008 - September 6, 2008
August 24, 2008 - August 30, 2008
August 17, 2008 - August 23, 2008
August 10, 2008 - August 16, 2008
August 3, 2008 - August 9, 2008
July 27, 2008 - August 2, 2008
April 20, 2008 - April 26, 2008
April 13, 2008 - April 19, 2008
April 6, 2008 - April 12, 2008
March 30, 2008 - April 5, 2008
March 23, 2008 - March 29, 2008
March 16, 2008 - March 22, 2008
RECENT COMMENTS
Wanna Work for Obama? Prepare for a Strip Search (1)
Paul Miller wrote:
Debra, I really appreciate your posts and I've read enoug...
[more]
Public School For the Obama Girls, Please? (113)
bcos wrote:
IMO using the Obama children to make a political point is ...
[more]
Hedge Fund Managers To Congress: Go Ahead, Regulate Us (3)
John wrote:
Brilliant and cogent criticism, Phillip. This sort of comm...
[more]
Court Smacks Down Bush Administration in White House Emails Case (12)
Dick Day wrote:
Does this mean that the Bush Administration has erased all...
[more]
I Was Right to Worry About Black Homophobia (58)
Paul Miller wrote:
Jason and many others who've made a similar point are righ...
[more]
Mormon Church GOTV for Prop 8: "Do All You Can" (106)
Patrick Henry wrote:
Brother Wiggins:
You gave us a sequence of historical eve...
[more]
Responding to Obama's Win, Michael (Son of) Reagan Says, Go After Dems on Sex (47)
Bob wrote:
Tell the son-of-the-guy who raised my taxes 7 times to goo...
[more]
Does That Make McCain Emperor Palpatine? (3)
Paul Miller wrote:
A Handmaiden's Tale was such a creepy book. No doubt tha...
[more]
David Plouffe For Democratic Party Chief? (17)
Alice wrote:
Oh dear god NO!! NOT David Plouffe! The D.N.C. needs someo...
[more]
Report: Rove Talks "Fairly Regularly" With McCain Camp; Getting Six Figures From Freedom's Watch (15)
Alice wrote:
Alot of things have "rove" written all over them. Like the...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


Posted by: capt on 09/02/08 at 9:39 AM Respond