«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
Iraqi Parliament to Vote Today on "Status of Forces Agreement"
The Iraqi Parliament is expected to vote today on the "Status of Forces Agreement" (SOFA), a document that, if passed, will establish guidelines for US forces in Iraq and, more importantly, set a timetable for their withdrawal. Washington and Baghdad signed on to a draft of the agreement earlier this month. If it is accepted today by at least 138 of the 275 members of Iraq's parliament, the document will then go to the Iraqi presidential council for final approval. SOFA, which the Iraqis are already informally calling "the withdrawal agreement," mandates that US forces pull out of Iraqi cities by June 30, 2009, and leave the country entirely by December 31, 2011, effectively ending the US occupation of Iraq.
According to Peter Galbraith, a senior diplomatic fellow at the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, who has written extensively on the American occupation for the New York Review of Books, the agreement represents "a stunning and humiliating reversal of course by the Bush administration, which had vehemently opposed any timetable for withdrawal from Iraq." But things change, and especially with Barack Obama's impending inauguration, SOFA is perhaps more acceptable to the current administration than leaving the timetable for withdrawal entirely in the hands of its successor. "The signing of this agreement, along with the election of a new president who ran on a platform to end the war in Iraq, suggests that anti-Iraq efforts have not been in vain," says John Isaacs, executive director of the Council for a Livable World. "The agreement reflects the views held by the majority of Iraqis and Americans that it is time for US combat forces to start getting out of Iraq."
Still, not all Iraqis are eager to see US forces leave. A Sunni bloc within the Iraqi Parliament, joined by a few renegade Kurds, are said to be holding out on ratification of SOFA. Their primary concern is "how they'll be treated by the Shiite government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki" once US forces depart, according to today's Wall Street Journal. Iraqi Sunnis formed the bulk of the insurgency in past years, but have more recently become partners in the American occupation, primarily to counter the ascendance of Shiite parties. US and Iraqi officials have been negotiating for Sunni support in the final hours leading up to today's vote.
Galbraith shares in the Sunnis' concern. "For the last two years, President Bush has pretended that Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki is a democrat and an American ally," he says. "In fact, Maliki is a sectarian Shiite politician who heads a government dominated by pro-Iranian religious parties. The US presence is now no longer serves the interests of Iraq's ruling Shiite religious parties or their Iranian allies, so we are now being asked to leave."
UPDATE: The Iraqi parliament has decided to put off the vote until tomorrow morning, allowing more time for SOFA's backers to persuade opponents of the agreement.
Comments
Why are you not doing articles on the fact that Obama has stopped talking about taking our troops out of Iraq. Just today the Iraqi Government voted to keep US troops until 2012. Didn't Obama promise change? Didn't he tell all you liberals that he would take the troops out day 1???
Change? What does that mean? You all were LIED to. And the liberal media never asked Obama a damn question!!!! Fools!
When are morons going to realize that Obama isn't President yet, never promised to load our troops on the next plane and boat out of Iraq, and hasn't broken a single fucking campaign promise yet.
I know people really want to stir the turd, but it's customary to wait until one is dropped.
Posted by: jon on 11/29/08 at 8:28 AM Respond
Obama did indeed promise to get our troops out of Iraq. In fact he promised to do so when things were not going well in Iraq. Now that things are better in Iraq, he's forgotten all about it. Bush got the time he needed to make the situation on the ground in Iraq better and now there's practically no one screaming for us to get out anymore. Now that the SOFA agreement has been signed, the credit for the US leaving Iraq will go to Bush. He timed this perfectly so that he can now say that he was the one who made the agreement with Iraq about how and when our troops leave Iraq. Obama will have to tear up the SOFA to get them out sooner and he's not going to do that because he won't want to be accused of tearing up the agreement. Plus, now he has hired Clinton and Gates, both proponents of the Iraq war. Ames Tiedeman is correct, Obama lied to us.
Posted by: milano on 12/01/08 at 11:54 AM Respond
The Democrat and Republican choices were accurately described as Bush-Lite and Bush-Clone.
Why feign surprise when the one we voted in turns out to look and act a whole lot like Bush?
Posted by: GVC on 12/01/08 at 12:14 PM Respond
jon comments: Obama ... hasn't broken a single f'ing campaign promise yet.
That's because he never got specific enough to actually make one.
All we got was a bunch of generalities, and a chant of "The Change We Need".
OK, so Robert Gates and Hillary Clinton are "The Change We Need", according to Barack.
Whoop-De-F'ing-Do!
Posted by: Mr. Contrarian on 12/01/08 at 6:18 PM Respond
ARCHIVE
December 14, 2008 - December 20, 2008
December 7, 2008 - December 13, 2008
November 30, 2008 - December 6, 2008
November 23, 2008 - November 29, 2008
November 16, 2008 - November 22, 2008
November 9, 2008 - November 15, 2008
November 2, 2008 - November 8, 2008
October 26, 2008 - November 1, 2008
October 19, 2008 - October 25, 2008
October 12, 2008 - October 18, 2008
October 5, 2008 - October 11, 2008
September 28, 2008 - October 4, 2008
September 21, 2008 - September 27, 2008
September 14, 2008 - September 20, 2008
September 7, 2008 - September 13, 2008
August 31, 2008 - September 6, 2008
August 24, 2008 - August 30, 2008
August 17, 2008 - August 23, 2008
August 10, 2008 - August 16, 2008
August 3, 2008 - August 9, 2008
July 27, 2008 - August 2, 2008
April 20, 2008 - April 26, 2008
RECENT COMMENTS
More on the Rick Warren Wrangle: It's Not About Gay Marriage (1)
smitisan wrote:
Watching the Saddleback debate, it was fairly obvious to m...
[more]
Rick Warren?? (43)
TadCF wrote:
I think it's important to bring the right wing an the left...
[more]
Should We Get Hot and Bothered By Obama's Personnel Choices? (10)
dan wrote:
"Dan, I think that you are missing an important reason for...
[more]
Poll: American Public Opinion Deeply at Odds With Rest of the World (14)
fred t wrote:
Yeah, replacing the Shah with the Ayatollah - that worked ...
[more]
MOJO VIDEO: Rallying to Unelect Obama (72)
sa wrote:
how do you explain the black man then? i think social cons...
[more]
Hillary Clinton Talks Withdrawal (11)
pack wrote:
I saw your headline: "Hillary Clinton Talks Withdrawal"-- ...
[more]
Hilda Solis: A Nominee To Get Excited About (4)
The View From Out Left wrote:
["The Economist notes that with the Solis pick, the white-...
[more]
Clinton Foundation Donor Info: Playing Hard To Get? (2)
Strictly Speaking... wrote:
It depends upon what the meaning of the word "disclosure" ...
[more]
Obama Wins and Redefines Real America (63)
A Little History wrote:
Dr. Basu observes: Of course, Gandhi was a lawyer.
...
[more]
Palin Will Indeed Bring The Breast Pump (17)
Ameda wrote:
Well, that's probably the only positive thing Palin did du...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


Posted by: Ames Tiedeman on 11/27/08 at 8:44 AM Respond