MOTHER JONES BY E-MAIL

Home Sour Home

Page 3 of 3


TOOLS

EmailE-mail article
PrintPrint article




BACKTALK

E-mail the editor





Google


RELATED ARTICLES

Middle-aged, Republican homemakers are not normally found protesting in the street, which is why Jordan Fogal made such an effective street protester.

"Lady, I had to stop," people would say. "Somebody must have really pissed you off."

"Oh my God! That's an area we're looking at! Oh my God! And they're not doing anything to help you?"

"I had no idea! I thought when you spent that kind of money..."

"Here," Jordan would say, "take another flier. I've got 10,000 more."

She was on television, in the papers. City Council members told her they would be watching for this builder, come permit time. ("It's terrible she paid a lot of money for a house she can't live in," council member Carol Alvarado says.) Prospective buyers at Tremont Tower looked at the pictures and got back in their cars. The staff at Tremont Tower called the police, she says, tried to have her car towed, and fenced in the area where motorists had pulled over to talk. When word came that she was being dragged into arbitration, Jordan realized she had "finally gotten their attention." Her fight was about to grow much larger.


THE BUILDERS' LAWYERS had filed a claim through the country's oldest and largest arbitration firm, the nonprofit American Arbitration Association. They sought declaratory relief from any complaint about "alleged construction defects"—past, present, and future—in Jordan Fogal's home.

Jordan still remembers her pleasant illusions of arbitration—how much "more civilized and nice" it sounded than just suing someone, "like a mom who sits down with her children and says, ‘Now, this is the way I see it. Now you two go do what's right.'"

What she found instead seemed neither pleasant nor fair. The Arbitration Association informed her that she would be expected to pay half of the arbitrator's fees— roughly $1,500 a day for the arbitration itself and $750 for a preliminary study of the problem—plus half of the charges to rent the hearing room and hire the stenographer; plus the cost of expert witnesses, if any; plus, if she wanted one, the cost of an attorney. Plus, since the proceeding would conclude all disputes against the builders, if she wished to file a counterclaim seeking reimbursement for the cost of her property, there would be an additional filing fee of $8,500.

The arbitrator would be chosen from a list of lawyers and mediators. His decision would not be required to have any basis in law, could nowhere be appealed, and would likely come with a gag order. Jordan filed for hardship relief, but her builders' lawyer, William S. Chesney III, insisted that she get none. She wrote long, emotional letters to her "solutions manager" at the arbitration firm, who shared them with Chesney and began sending her bills. It was like reasoning with a machine, she says, and in her letters and fliers she let the world know about her outrage—about the "shocking costs" of binding arbitration, the "stacked deck" of the arbitrator, that "henchman for torturing victims [of] the builders."


"MRS. FOGAL HAS BECOME rather high-profile," observed Charles Turet, the lawyer for Thibodeau, when I visited his office. "This is the first time we've encountered anything of this magnitude."

The magnitude was such that Turet's client had found the need to talk after all. Turet said they were certainly not afraid of the facts of the case, "as long as all of the facts get out." Then he added they really couldn't discuss the facts in detail. It was therefore left to Thibodeau, a glaring, goateed man, to explain that he thought Jordan was being quite unfair. "She's gone out and created this frenzy!" he said. "This crusade—calling radio stations, sitting on the corner with lemons." And "if she thinks the way to solve problems is to extort money with lemons, fine! But I'm not going to play that game."

So did Thibodeau stand behind his work? Thibodeau paused. Yes, he answered: He would always ask his customers to do a thorough walk-through, and they wouldn't close the deal if the customer had an issue. "Our goal is not to have to go back into someone's house after closing," he said. Or, as the lawyer Chesney put it, not to "be held hostage to every little thing Mrs. Fogal claims."

"You know," Chesney went on, "it is absolutely amazing how many people out there don't have the problems Mrs. Fogal has."

Told of the lawsuit brought against them by the residents of Hyde Park Crescent two months earlier, Turet said, "That's news to us." Chesney said to me, "You'd better see the letters they wrote to us, because we never got them."

And Thibodeau said he really had to go.


"THOSE LYING SACKS OF...,"said William Ferebee, the lawyer representing the Fogals' neighbors. In his office across town from Turet's, he produced a sheaf of court documents that had been sent by certified mail to the builders' lawyers, as well as the responses, signed by William S. Chesney III.

The case is likely to drag out for a while. Facing lawsuits, builders often drain their companies of assets and start anew under a different name. Thibodeau and Casimiro have both recently started new companies, and Chesney claims Thibodeau's new company isn't liable for work done by the old company.

But neither Thibodeau nor Casimiro can get rid of Jordan Fogal. Whichever business names they travel by, she continues to dog them. Already she has helped to get their companies ejected from the Better Business Bureau. Unable to sue their builders, the Fogals are now being sued for "business disparagement" by a builder with connections to Casimiro and Thibodeau. They face arbitration, foreclosure, bankruptcy—"more legal troubles than you can shake a stick at," says Jordan's lawyer. But after what she's been through, Jordan says, "I don't think you can ever walk away."

In her apartment, Jordan Fogal points to an ancient photo and says, "This is what Mr. Thibodeau doesn't know about me." It's a picture of several old men—her great-uncles from Alabama. They decided that until the South rose again, they would never shave their beards. "And they were all buried with very long beards."

Randall Patterson is a freelance writer based in Asheville, North Carolina.

Photo: Getty Images



 

Post a Comment

Your Name: 

Your Comment: 
 
Please press "Submit" only once to avoid double-posting.
All HTML formatting is removed from comments.
Read the Mother Jones community rules here.

Comments:

Our builder threatens us with a lawsuit for speaking to the Building and Development in our county. We know they have no ground on the lawsuit, but they could drain us financially.
Posted by:Home OwnerJune 11, 2007 6:13:18 AMRespond ^
Thank you for attention to this bad business. I waqs just 10 seconds away from signing a new home contract with the Mandatory Arbitration clause... A point should be made. It appears that about 15% of the houses are really bad..so 85 houses are ok...but heaven help the buyers of the other 15 houses. Really big losses, not only the house, legal fees, loss of domicile, loss of money, but also all those "consequent" damages that are denied, your furnoishings, your photos, your heritage keepsakes. And most of all your self respect due you in justice. If it didn't matter, and I have asked new home builders, just remove that mandatory arbitration clause from the contract, and I will trust the American civil courts open justice. They refuse. Genevieve Lesiak Rhode Island. I almost bought new home in Florida...4 years ago. I find the same story in new home contracts from large buiders here, too. I will wait and buy from a reseller and have complete inspections done even if its a month old.
Posted by:Genevieve LesiakJune 11, 2007 6:48:54 AMRespond ^
If I could be of help in your quest for justice I would. I am in the process of fighting with Perry Homes for misrepresenting the town home I purchased (built from the ground up). I do not have the funds that Perry has or the connections in politics, but misrepresentation is mirepresentation no matter who does it. I wish you the best.
Posted by:Bobbi TemplinJune 11, 2007 7:12:55 AMRespond ^
I am a Lennar homeowner living a similar nightmare. I bought my nightmare in Commerce City colorado 1 year ago, and have just got the go ahead for mediation. Numerous water leaks, improper electrical wiring, missing support pole(22 feet unsupported home-18 feet is the max amount alloted) missing insulation, incomplete duct work, $742 water bill not paid by Lennar that I had to pay to prevent a lien against me and also stop the water from being turned off. Lennar has some serious issues as published in defectivehomes.com. Their promise to outstanding quailty and customer care is a joke. Not only should we hold homebuilders accountable, but also the city for their failed inspections. We as customers should have a voice to expose these homebuilders who have cut corners to make a profit. My Lennar Lemon should be demolished and my investment returned. Lennar has a double standard. Their executives would not accept this shoddy construction but expect us to feel safe and secure in our investment. Lennar needs to be exposed for their lack of integrity and ownership to their homeowners. Their profits are falling as is the number of home sales. With further exposure they will have to own up to their inequities and either provide the quality they promise or continue to lose the home sales resulting in declining profits.
Posted by:Carol SimmonsJune 13, 2007 7:55:19 AMRespond ^
At present my family is 5 years into litigation with our home builder TK Constructors, who build in Indiana, Kentucky and Ohio. I am a Realtor and that title means that I represent my clients best interest. Arbitration takes away civil rights and that is not in the best interest of anyone. All the while realizing that I am not an attorney but I wouldn't advise signing builder contracts without first taking the contract to your lawyer so that he can explain exactly what you are getting yourself into. My brother n law who is also involved is a paralyzed veteran, whos' dreams have also been shattered. He was supposed to build on the land also but instead of building he's funding a lawsuit. We are both heading to Washington for the press conference in July. Whatever it takes, but this is consumer abuse and must be quickly delt with and ended. Our lives are in limbo, ever since about two months after moving in we saw water entering over the sill plate and in an instant my heart sank as I knew this was very bad. My children have suffered at the hands of my builder for 5 long years and we just want it over and behind us.
Posted by:Kathy StutlerJune 25, 2007 2:55:48 PMRespond ^
I was just on a Jury where SCI was suing the roofer in the Hyde Park project (Aztec Roofing) It seemed very early in the trial that SCI was a very poor home builder. They want to blame others for not over seeing a proper project. While it appeared that all the roofing companies were sub standard, the lack of care on the part of SCI was inexcusable. Very BAD People, concerned with just more money.
Posted by:RSVJune 29, 2007 2:50:32 PMRespond ^
Sadly, the Fogals also suffered from an acute case of Republican Syndrome. RS can be recognized by a number of symptoms. Chief among these is a lack of empathy, or the inability to put oneself in another person's shoes. This leads to a lifetime of making selfish choices, often characterized by harshly punitive measures aimed at those who are "so stupid that they are getting what they deserve". Most sufferers of RS never gain awareness of their ailment until they are personally afflicted by the results of their prior choices, and votes. Put more simply, the Fogals are living in the world they voted for and now they don't like it. Ms. Fogal speaks approvingly of her racist ancestors. I'm sure she never thought that she herself would someday be in the position of a powerless minority, a victim of people with more power, privilege and money than she has.
Posted by:JRAugust 20, 2007 7:08:54 PMRespond ^
JR, You, my friend, are point on.
Posted by:CTAugust 21, 2007 3:24:34 PMRespond ^
We are dealing with the same situation in NC except our home was an existing home and we discovered the water intrusion problems after only two weeks of living in the house. We are now in an apartment and the mortgage company is trying to force us into foreclosure since we can't afford litigation at over $100,000 legal fees and only a 5% chance to win as per attorneys we have spoken with. It astonishes us that there are no "lemon laws" for houses. It isn't fair that our builder is still able to build by just changing his company name and was not required to carry insurance while he built our home to cover builder defects. It also isn't sure that homeowner's insurance companies can get out of paying anything in these situations, that's why we have insurance at the outragous rates they charge. It isn't fair to our children to have to live in a tiny apartment with none of their belongings because everything we own is contaminated with mold spores! There has to be a way through this without destroying our credit, where is the justice?
Posted by:AGAugust 23, 2007 4:29:16 AMRespond ^
This artical was clearly written from a political point of view. Calling her a republican, hitting Mr. Perry, calling the TRCC a builder lead group,..., it is not a balanced artical, period.
Posted by:WillAugust 23, 2007 9:20:07 AMRespond ^
well said - the horrors of an unjust society where the right to trial by jury is taken away and only the fat cats have the remaining tools- Clearly an indictment of the Republican party's un-American--justice "for sale" ways- and Texas is their playground!
Posted by:rickAugust 23, 2007 9:46:52 AMRespond ^
Shoddy Construction - Everyone Pays Except those with Sovereign Immunity What do you call 50 plus Connecticut Building Code Violations, water coming through your garage for months on end, ice 4 plus inches thick on your driveway, septic vent pipe venting into an attic, open junction boxes and getting called ignorant or threatened by Portland, CT Official? We call is Collins Hell. 8/22/07, Maya Roney wrote an article discussing the issues of shoddy construction and how this is impacting homeowners. I can speak of this issue first hand. We purchased our brand new home in September, 2003 only to find out that it was built by an unlicensed builder and the home was not inspected prior to the CO being issued. We have a brand new home that is riddled with code violations (over 50 documented Connecticut State Building Code violations) that present safety issues. The cost to fix these ticking time bombs? Over $100, 000. While we have sued the unlicensed builder and have a judgment against him – collecting is another story. We are currently suing the Town of Portland, CT as well as the Public Works Director and the Ex-Building Official (who resigned and then went to work as the Building Official in a neighboring town). We were lied to, threatened, and now the town’s employee’s are claiming sovereign immunity. So in other words, it’s ok not to do you job and put people at risk. It's ok for them not to do their jobs, but we still have to pay our sky high taxes and suck up the damages that were caused by their gross AND I MEAN GROSS NEGLIGENCE. Everything we have is documented to the letter. What did we do wrong other than expect to have the home of our dreams? We can't afford to pay for our house twice. Why do shoddy builders and shady town officials get away with this?? To learn more about our story, visit www.collinshell.com
Posted by:CollinsHellAugust 27, 2007 1:35:24 PMRespond ^
Lennar Nightmares...here are countless stories..www.huttoparke.com
Posted by:anonymousSeptember 20, 2007 6:38:44 PMRespond ^
I have first hand knowledge of this case and can tell you it is racially motivated. She reference this herself in arogant manner with her own statement, ." It's a picture of several old men—her great-uncles from Alabama. They decided that until the South rose again, they would never shave their beards. "And they were all buried with very long beards." When Ms. Fogal discovered that her builder are Jewish and Hispanic she became in raged. She then began her quest.
Posted by:Marcus SlistinoSeptember 30, 2007 7:50:00 AMRespond ^
This is what happens when the house you buy its build SCAB/Rat. Low paying job or piece work. The faster you build it, the faster you can cash your money. This is why we should support Unions and defeat Right to Work Laws. Not good for Americans
Posted by:JAMDecember 1, 2007 9:25:22 AMRespond ^
Anyone that buys a house in a developement from a mass builder is taking a big risk.If you can actually afford several hundred thousand dollars you are probably better off in the long run hiring your own architect and contractor.
Posted by:zqahttDecember 1, 2007 11:40:11 AMRespond ^
IT WAS A MISMATCH from the start—one mad-as-hell housewife against the entire construction-industrial complex. Home-building is a chief indicator of the economy's health, and politicians are rarely inclined to slow it down with regulation or oversight. Reinforcing that impulse is an extremely well-funded, organized builder lobby whose focus, according to Janet Ahmad of the watchdog group HomeOwners for Better Building (HOBB), has never been "on how to build a house correctly, but on how to limit regulations and liability." Isn't this the Republican philosophy, government can't actually do anything, let the "free market" solve the problems, and the lawyers don't need to get involved, at least not on the side of regular citizens but the corporations can have and use them all they want, because their frivilous lawsuits just drive up the cost of everything.
Posted by:zqahttDecember 1, 2007 2:15:12 PMRespond ^
I was recently shopping for a condominium in the Houston area and had particular interest in the Tremont Tower, however, after reading this piece I will obviously stike it from my list possibilities. It's beyond me that these men aren't in jail. What's more baffling is why they wouldn't build a sound product in the first place and avoid all of this arbitrary headache while nurturing a continually growing positive business and constuction reputation. Is all these cutting corners and cheating really worth it? I don't know where they learned business, but it's obvios they wouldn't survive in the world of big time, international commerce with this approach. I hope they get what they deserve and I will certainly avoid any of their products in the future.
Posted by:Lauren MooreDecember 6, 2007 10:48:34 AMRespond ^
Now my builder is suing me for the bad house that he sould me look for no help from the state builder the state loves home onwers they dont love we dont pay the lobbiest my house is built by Choice Homes was a bad choice on my part
Posted by:MOJanuary 29, 2008 10:35:57 AMRespond ^
Excellent article. Any update/ How can issue be legally changed to true legal justice/?
Posted by:Genevieve LesakMarch 29, 2008 8:14:02 AMRespond ^
Sad that you would think that you have first hand knowledge of this. Please learn your history and quit thinking everything is about race.
Posted by:Innocent BystanderJuly 11, 2008 7:58:28 PMRespond ^
Sounds like a disgruntled evil democrat who doesn't know what it means to work all your life to just see it go down the drain because there are no standards....something the demoncrats know all too well. NO standards.
Posted by:Dale HeathOctober 1, 2008 9:02:47 AMRespond ^

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com

Real Viagra, Cialis Levitra Deal
Dare to compare our competitive prices. Free overnight delivery to new patients in the US. No catch 22!

Bob's Red Mill Organic Flaxseed Meal
In addition to its great nutty flavor, our flaxseed meal is high in fiber and packed with essential Omega-3 Fatty Acids.

PEACEFUL HOLIDAY GIFTS
Items featuring the 1958 peace symbol shirts, buttons, hoodys, signs, stickers pins...more. union made • detroit peacebuttons.info

End the genocide in Darfur
Every day, Darfuris face rape, murder, and starvation. Be a Voice for Darfur: tell Obama to end the suffering.
















Car Tax Update

Apple Woes

Blog Bleg

More CDS Chatter


More MoJo voices...



bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN

Advertise Liberally

This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2005 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS