MOTHER JONES BY E-MAIL

The Fate of the Ocean

Page 10 of 12


TOOLS

EmailE-mail article
PrintPrint article




BACKTALK

E-mail the editor





Google


RELATED ARTICLES

In the wake of the epidemic, filamentous algae, which the sea urchins ate, exploded across the reefs. St. Croix saw a 27 percent increase in algal biomass within five days of the sea urchin die-off. In the course of two years, Jamaica’s reefs increased in algal cover from 1 percent up to 95 percent. More algae left less room for new coral colonies to recruit; 23 years later, the reefs of the region still echo with the effects, appearing so radically redesigned that many no longer exist as coral-dominated systems at all but as seaweed-dominant systems akin to farms of undersea lettuce. Even more significant, these changes appear to be permanent, since the primary surviving predators of the filamentous algae—herbivorous fishes—have been, and continue to be, extensively overfished by humans in the region. Diadema antillarum has not recovered either, a victim apparently of too few animals scattered over too wide an area to effectively spawn.

Across the world ocean, marine diseases are on the rise, fueled by, among other things, the desertification of Africa, which raises huge volumes of dust that off-loads bacterial and fungal spores into the weakened seas. Many coral diseases have appeared more frequently in the past 10 years, including white-band disease, black-band disease, dark-spots disease, red-band disease, white plague, white pox, yellow blotch disease, and so on. Photographs of reefs from the 1930s show little or none of these infestations.

With or without pestilences, coral reefs are under assault, and the exhaustive 2004 Status of Coral Reefs of the World warns that global warming is the single greatest threat to corals, with 20 percent of the world’s reefs so badly damaged they are unlikely to recover and another 50 percent teetering on the edge. Within the next 50 years, massive coral bleaching events on the order of the 1998 El Nińo, which damaged or destroyed 16 percent of the world’s reefs, will become regular, possibly annual, occurrences. Sadly, most of the so-called nurseries of the sea face similar prognoses. Fifteen percent of the world’s seagrass beds have disappeared in the past 10 years alone, depriving marine species—from juvenile fish and invertebrates to dugongs, manatees, and sea turtles—of critical habitats. Likewise, kelp beds are dying at alarming rates; 75 percent are gone from Southern California alone—victims of, among other things, the demise of sea otters that regulate populations of kelp-eating sea urchins.

Among the most frightening news for coral reefs is the increasing acidity of the ocean as a result of rising levels of carbon dioxide. Scientists at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration recently estimated the ocean has absorbed 118 billion metric tons of CO2 since the onset of the Industrial Revolution—about half of the total we’ve released into the atmosphere—with 20 to 25 million more tons being added daily. This mitigation of CO2 is good for our atmosphere but bad for our ocean, since it changes the pH. Studies indicate that the shells and skeletons possessed by everything from reef-building corals to mollusks to plankton begin to dissolve within 48 hours of exposure to the acidity expected in the ocean by 2050.

Coral reefs, buffeted by so many stressors, will almost certainly disappear. But the loss of plankton is even more worrisome. Collectively, marine phytoplankton have influenced life on earth more than any other organism, since they are significant alleviators of greenhouse gases, major manufacturers of oxygen, and the primary producers of the marine food web. Yet because many phytoplankton produce minute aragonite shells, these pastures of the sea may not survive changing pH levels. Zooplankton, meanwhile, are largely composed of the larval forms of all the ocean’s other life-forms—from fish to squid to shellfish—whose calcium carbonate constructions are also unlikely to survive changed pH levels*. By facilitating radical changes in these, the immense populations of the very small, we might as well erase the world as we know it, one bone, one seashell at a time.


YEARS AGO, WHILE I WAS FILMING aboard a small sailboat in the Turks and Caicos Islands, someone on the crew found a message in a bottle floating miles from any land. Since we did not readily have the means to open the barnacle-encrusted cap, the skipper took it to the stern of the boat, steadied his aim against the rocking of the waves, and with one blow from a hammer knocked the glass neck off. Four of us crowded close, yet none could catch the paper as it accidentally slipped overboard. Four of us dove in, but none could find the note in the currents swirling underwater.



 

Post a Comment

Your Name: 

Your Comment: 
 
Please press "Submit" only once to avoid double-posting.
All HTML formatting is removed from comments.
Read the Mother Jones community rules here.

Comments:

How long do you it'll take before were at a point of no return?
Posted by:Melissa AlvarezJune 5, 2007 1:36:21 PMRespond ^
Thank you Julia Whitty for this very deep look into the Ocean, and the not so kind relationship we humans are so profoundly having on it. Your words are filled with wisdom to which we should all pay close attention to before it is to late.
Posted by:SashaJuly 17, 2007 5:40:33 PMRespond ^
What could be the last signs before life ends within Mother Sea ? What are the signs to watch for us who live and work ashore, especiallyfor us deep inside any continents? Life may well survive the Homo sapiens sapiens species. Yet I «pray» for a genetic mutation affecting the whole species, a miracle to have us learn not to polute and kill our only spaceship/home and all life that is connected and that is sustained by Grand Mother Earth, Grand father Sun, Mother Sea and Father Air . A miracle to have us be gardeners instead of suicidal abusers of our host, Grand mother Earth. Was'nt the Homo sapiens species a social animal, (like ants, thermites and bees) Yet survival of the strongest and /or the fittest seems to always bring the Homo sapiens and his developed mind, to use that tool more to eat up or ABUSE at hi$ profit the weakest link of the social chain than to support and reenforce it. Yet I believe we could think of our social chain of life as extending to all living beings ! We are not there yet Another thousand years ?...
Posted by:C C DUBUCAugust 11, 2007 5:08:17 PMRespond ^
Is this required reading for all our politicians and policy makers?
Posted by:Leslie ChristensenAugust 12, 2007 7:51:50 AMRespond ^
I'm sure that the fishing industry and its lobbyists can find experts that will dispute everything in this article.I'm afraid the only way humanity can learn any lessons will be the very hard way.
Posted by:Scott ParsonsAugust 12, 2007 3:42:04 PMRespond ^
How long do you it'll take before were at a point of no return? Posted by:Melissa Alvarez onJune 5, 2007 1:36:21 PM Mellisa, the answer to you question is simple. We're already there. Matt
Posted by:MattAugust 26, 2007 4:08:52 AMRespond ^
Unless the global energy consumption is reduced rapidly—by mid 2006—to levels below 60 exajoules (6E+19 joules) annually (this level is about 12.4 percent of global energy consumption in 2005), our studies show that the runaway positive feedback loops that are destroying Earth’s ecosystems including ozone holes, global heating, extreme climatic events, toxic pollution, resources depletion, war, unethical behavior, and disease pandemics would reach the point of no return and overwhelm our life support systems rendering most of our cities uninhabitable by as early as 2015, possibly earlier. Failure to rein back the global energy consumption to the levels below 60 exajoules annually by June 2006 would render the concept of sustainable management redundant (it seems highly unlikely that post industrial civilization would voluntarily sacrifice its perceived privileges and values in favor of sustaining life on Earth). MSRB is replacing its current program with a disaster rescue operation. http://msrb.wordpress.com/stop-burning-earth/
Posted by:MSRBSeptember 7, 2007 10:39:02 PMRespond ^
The MSRB Index of Human Impact on Nature (HIoN) currently stands at a terminally high level of 171.40 that is 71.4 percent higher than the planet could cope with resulting in the collapse of the population centers by as early as 2015, possibly earlier. http://msrb.wordpress.com/its-1100pm/
Posted by:MSRB -2September 7, 2007 10:41:32 PMRespond ^
Time for us all to think of all life on our planet as one being - LIFE - and for us to realize that we all live together, essentially in one house - one habitat - inter-related, interdependent, and that we all need to : stop breeding, since human overpopulation is the sole reason for the loss of quailty of life on Earth and for the massive and growing pollution (greening a few things won't help at all unles we all go vegan) and also - go vegan - the more people going vegan, the more chance we have for life to continue with any quality at all. Read this: http://environment.newscientis t.com/channel/earth/mg18825304 .800-its-better-to-green-your-diet-than-your-car.html
Posted by:Jake MooreSeptember 10, 2007 2:19:07 PMRespond ^
Great informative & heartfelt program by Julia Whitty. Along with the stark reality of the downfall of nature & our environment here are two thoughts that could be brought into the equation of saving our planet (of course there are many others also!) There are two vital changes for mankind to begin to address these huge problems. One is reduce our population. The second is to convert to vegan, vegetarian diet. I am vegan & know that it is a challenge, but the benefits & increased health are worth the perceived sacrifice. It is the ethic of "ahimsa" or non-violence toward all creatures that share our beautiful planet. It is good for us, the dear creatures & our environment. Thank you all for presenting this vital information. larryskanda@yahoo.com
Posted by:Larry GibsonOctober 31, 2007 9:12:36 AMRespond ^
Thank you for expanding my horizons on the wonderful oceans and what damage has been done by irresponibility, may we all wake up and smell the salty air before it is too late.
Posted by:Paul GrinderJanuary 3, 2008 3:16:39 PMRespond ^
Science has shown the success of no fish zones. These zones repopulate the rest of the ocean. Also, large fish need to be thrown back. They have healthier roe and produce exponentially more roe. By throwing these large healthy fish back we preserve a superior gene pool, produce more fish, and avoid the more polluted older fish as is seen from the contamination of the large and old blue fin tuna. The younger fish also taste better.
Posted by:skarpknutJanuary 27, 2008 11:03:38 PMRespond ^
I had a little casa on the Baja just south of San Felipe Mexico. In the early '80s The brilliant Government of Mexico, for unknown monies, let the Japanese come into these pristine waters with processing ships and trawlers, and within six months you couldn't catch a decent mess of fish. The local Mexican fisherman would go out in their boats to their fishing grounds they had fished for generations and return with only a minuscule remnant of what they had been harvesting for decades. World focus on the endangered oceans is desperately needed but it will be a monumental task to get all the parties in agreement
Posted by:Gary HansonJanuary 29, 2008 2:49:38 PMRespond ^
Oceans need to be stop being polluted!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by:Breanna HauseFebruary 6, 2008 8:04:37 AMRespond ^
why are we not doingany thing to help our oceans
Posted by:kassiApril 25, 2008 10:16:46 AMRespond ^
we aren't doing anything because our goverment sucks
Posted by:loriApril 25, 2008 10:18:04 AMRespond ^

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com
















bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN


This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2006 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS