MOTHER JONES BY E-MAIL

The Fate of the Ocean

Page 11 of 12


TOOLS

EmailE-mail article
PrintPrint article




BACKTALK

E-mail the editor





Google


RELATED ARTICLES

As matters stand, we miss many messages, even those that wash ashore. Walk any beach these days and you’ll likely find miniature SOS signals littering the tide line: seabirds drowned in fishing nets, plastic flotsam, globules of oil, castaway cargo from containers lost overboard. Seek in the waters just offshore and you may well find male fish bearing eggs or ovary tissue, the unfortunate results of living near sewage outflows, where chemicals, including the copious quantities of pharmaceuticals inhabiting our bodies, flow to the sea. Despite the ocean’s fetch, there is no place on it where our impact is not seen, felt, or heard.

Noise is our newest assault, including the low-frequency active (LFA) sonar used by the military to detect submarines and by the oil and gas industry to search for fossil fuels. The loudest sound ever put into the seas, LFA sonar could soon be deployed across 80 percent of the world ocean, at an amplitude of 230 decibels, strident enough to kill whales and dolphins and already causing mass strandings and deaths in areas where navies conduct exercises [see “Collateral Damage”]. A few people, misfortunate enough to be in the water near LFA sonar tests, have suffered lung vibrations, seizures, disorientation, and nausea. No one knows what effects these extreme noises have on the majority of marine life that “see” underwater with their acoustical senses.

Meanwhile, plastic pollutants masquerade as familiar marine objects. David Barnes of the British Antarctic Survey finds that invertebrates that normally hitch rides on floating wood or pumice are increasingly grabbing lifts on floating plastics; the presence of so many new “boats” has doubled the spread of exotic species in the subtropics and more than tripled it at high latitudes, threatening biodiversity worldwide. Furthermore, fish and invertebrates commonly mistake the ubiquitous pellets of partially degraded plastic, known as nurdles, for zooplankton, and ingest them, poisoning themselves and all who eat them, while sea turtles and marine mammals perish from consuming plastic bags, which resemble jellyfish.

Increasingly, persistent organic pollutants (POPs) such as DDT and PCBs are being found in such high levels in marine animals that some living creatures meet our definitions of toxic waste, including many whales, dolphins, and seals. Female mammals off-load POPs in their breast milk, lessening their own toxic load while poisoning their children. Perhaps consequently, killer whale calves from Puget Sound and the Canadian Southwest are dying in the first year; adult male orca, which have no off-loading capabilities, are also dying off. In 2005, the National Marine Fisheries Service listed this population as endangered. Currently, there is no such listing for the people who rely on marine mammal meat, even though the accumulation of POPs in the tissues of Greenland Inuits has nearly reached levels known to suppress the immune system.

The problems facing the world ocean are virtually all human-induced, and many are beginning to cross-pollinate. Jellyfish populations expand in response to red tides and hypoxia, as well as to the depletion of their competitors, such as menhaden [see “Net Losses,”]. This, combined with the virtual extinction of jellyfish-eating sea turtles (leatherbacks have declined 97 percent in 22 years), leaves more food for those jellies that prey mostly upon other jellyfish. Thus the nearly independent jelly web is expanding—and increasing its impact on human fishers, including forcing the closure of the Gulf of Mexico shrimp fishery in 2000, when 25-pound jellyfish native to Australia swarmed so heavily that shrimpers were unable to retrieve their nets.

In a similar vortex of cause and effect, researchers from NASA and the U.S. Geological Survey forecast that Alaskan earthquakes will increase in the wake of retreating glaciers, triggering more tsunamis, as happened dramatically in similar warmer epochs of the past. Freed of the immense weight of these rivers of ice, tectonic stresses are released, sometimes for the first time in millennia. Many scientists also believe that a warmer ocean is making hurricanes bigger, faster growing, and stronger, with 2005’s Hurricane Wilma prompting a call for a new Category 6 on the Saffir-Simpson scale, or a new scale altogether. And because bigger storms destroy more coastal wetlands and mangrove forests, they also incidentally reduce the land’s natural buffering against storms and earthquake-generated tsunamis.



 

Post a Comment

Your Name: 

Your Comment: 
 
Please press "Submit" only once to avoid double-posting.
All HTML formatting is removed from comments.
Read the Mother Jones community rules here.

Comments:

How long do you it'll take before were at a point of no return?
Posted by:Melissa AlvarezJune 5, 2007 1:36:21 PMRespond ^
Thank you Julia Whitty for this very deep look into the Ocean, and the not so kind relationship we humans are so profoundly having on it. Your words are filled with wisdom to which we should all pay close attention to before it is to late.
Posted by:SashaJuly 17, 2007 5:40:33 PMRespond ^
What could be the last signs before life ends within Mother Sea ? What are the signs to watch for us who live and work ashore, especiallyfor us deep inside any continents? Life may well survive the Homo sapiens sapiens species. Yet I «pray» for a genetic mutation affecting the whole species, a miracle to have us learn not to polute and kill our only spaceship/home and all life that is connected and that is sustained by Grand Mother Earth, Grand father Sun, Mother Sea and Father Air . A miracle to have us be gardeners instead of suicidal abusers of our host, Grand mother Earth. Was'nt the Homo sapiens species a social animal, (like ants, thermites and bees) Yet survival of the strongest and /or the fittest seems to always bring the Homo sapiens and his developed mind, to use that tool more to eat up or ABUSE at hi$ profit the weakest link of the social chain than to support and reenforce it. Yet I believe we could think of our social chain of life as extending to all living beings ! We are not there yet Another thousand years ?...
Posted by:C C DUBUCAugust 11, 2007 5:08:17 PMRespond ^
Is this required reading for all our politicians and policy makers?
Posted by:Leslie ChristensenAugust 12, 2007 7:51:50 AMRespond ^
I'm sure that the fishing industry and its lobbyists can find experts that will dispute everything in this article.I'm afraid the only way humanity can learn any lessons will be the very hard way.
Posted by:Scott ParsonsAugust 12, 2007 3:42:04 PMRespond ^
How long do you it'll take before were at a point of no return? Posted by:Melissa Alvarez onJune 5, 2007 1:36:21 PM Mellisa, the answer to you question is simple. We're already there. Matt
Posted by:MattAugust 26, 2007 4:08:52 AMRespond ^
Unless the global energy consumption is reduced rapidly—by mid 2006—to levels below 60 exajoules (6E+19 joules) annually (this level is about 12.4 percent of global energy consumption in 2005), our studies show that the runaway positive feedback loops that are destroying Earth’s ecosystems including ozone holes, global heating, extreme climatic events, toxic pollution, resources depletion, war, unethical behavior, and disease pandemics would reach the point of no return and overwhelm our life support systems rendering most of our cities uninhabitable by as early as 2015, possibly earlier. Failure to rein back the global energy consumption to the levels below 60 exajoules annually by June 2006 would render the concept of sustainable management redundant (it seems highly unlikely that post industrial civilization would voluntarily sacrifice its perceived privileges and values in favor of sustaining life on Earth). MSRB is replacing its current program with a disaster rescue operation. http://msrb.wordpress.com/stop-burning-earth/
Posted by:MSRBSeptember 7, 2007 10:39:02 PMRespond ^
The MSRB Index of Human Impact on Nature (HIoN) currently stands at a terminally high level of 171.40 that is 71.4 percent higher than the planet could cope with resulting in the collapse of the population centers by as early as 2015, possibly earlier. http://msrb.wordpress.com/its-1100pm/
Posted by:MSRB -2September 7, 2007 10:41:32 PMRespond ^
Time for us all to think of all life on our planet as one being - LIFE - and for us to realize that we all live together, essentially in one house - one habitat - inter-related, interdependent, and that we all need to : stop breeding, since human overpopulation is the sole reason for the loss of quailty of life on Earth and for the massive and growing pollution (greening a few things won't help at all unles we all go vegan) and also - go vegan - the more people going vegan, the more chance we have for life to continue with any quality at all. Read this: http://environment.newscientis t.com/channel/earth/mg18825304 .800-its-better-to-green-your-diet-than-your-car.html
Posted by:Jake MooreSeptember 10, 2007 2:19:07 PMRespond ^
Great informative & heartfelt program by Julia Whitty. Along with the stark reality of the downfall of nature & our environment here are two thoughts that could be brought into the equation of saving our planet (of course there are many others also!) There are two vital changes for mankind to begin to address these huge problems. One is reduce our population. The second is to convert to vegan, vegetarian diet. I am vegan & know that it is a challenge, but the benefits & increased health are worth the perceived sacrifice. It is the ethic of "ahimsa" or non-violence toward all creatures that share our beautiful planet. It is good for us, the dear creatures & our environment. Thank you all for presenting this vital information. larryskanda@yahoo.com
Posted by:Larry GibsonOctober 31, 2007 9:12:36 AMRespond ^
Thank you for expanding my horizons on the wonderful oceans and what damage has been done by irresponibility, may we all wake up and smell the salty air before it is too late.
Posted by:Paul GrinderJanuary 3, 2008 3:16:39 PMRespond ^
Science has shown the success of no fish zones. These zones repopulate the rest of the ocean. Also, large fish need to be thrown back. They have healthier roe and produce exponentially more roe. By throwing these large healthy fish back we preserve a superior gene pool, produce more fish, and avoid the more polluted older fish as is seen from the contamination of the large and old blue fin tuna. The younger fish also taste better.
Posted by:skarpknutJanuary 27, 2008 11:03:38 PMRespond ^
I had a little casa on the Baja just south of San Felipe Mexico. In the early '80s The brilliant Government of Mexico, for unknown monies, let the Japanese come into these pristine waters with processing ships and trawlers, and within six months you couldn't catch a decent mess of fish. The local Mexican fisherman would go out in their boats to their fishing grounds they had fished for generations and return with only a minuscule remnant of what they had been harvesting for decades. World focus on the endangered oceans is desperately needed but it will be a monumental task to get all the parties in agreement
Posted by:Gary HansonJanuary 29, 2008 2:49:38 PMRespond ^
Oceans need to be stop being polluted!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by:Breanna HauseFebruary 6, 2008 8:04:37 AMRespond ^
why are we not doingany thing to help our oceans
Posted by:kassiApril 25, 2008 10:16:46 AMRespond ^
we aren't doing anything because our goverment sucks
Posted by:loriApril 25, 2008 10:18:04 AMRespond ^

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com
















bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN


This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2006 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS