MOTHER JONES BY E-MAIL

The Fate of the Ocean

Page 7 of 12


TOOLS

EmailE-mail article
PrintPrint article




BACKTALK

E-mail the editor





Google


RELATED ARTICLES

Hixon tells me that we need a Kuhnian paradigm shift in fisheries management. “Current managers learned single-species management, and they’re resistant to changing that, even though it seldom works.” A scientific consensus signed by him and 218 other scientists and policy experts pleads for an updated approach: “From a scientific perspective, we now know enough to improve dramatically the conservation and management of marine systems through the implementation of ecosystem-based approaches.”

As on land, protecting places is the best way to preserve life. In 2003, the World Conservation Union listed 102,102 protected areas on earth. But only 4,116 of these were protected marine areas, preserving less than 0.5 percent of the world ocean, whereas 11.5 percent of the land surface has been granted some form of sanctuary. To reach parity, we need to add 23 times as many marine reserves and offshore national parks, or 10 times more total area—and perhaps even more, since the liquid medium of the ocean is more in-terconnected, and the fate of its disparate realms more intertwined than here.


RACHEL CARSON wrote of the sea that “in its mysterious past it encompasses all the dim origins of life and receives in the end, after, it may be, many transmutations, the dead husks of that same life. For all at last return to the sea—to Oceanus, the ocean river.” We return to the sea, too, in various husks, including in the form of atmospheric emissions. Sweden, for example, calculates that its populace of 8.9 million carries 2.8 tons of mercury fillings in their mouths, most of which is destined eventually to go airborne in crematoriums.

Crematory emissions are a small but growing percentage of the total global mercury pollution, the vast majority of which enters the foodweb as a biologically active derivative of the inorganic mercury released by the smokestacks of the coal and chlorine industries. Oxidized in the atmosphere and piggybacking on raindrops, this form of mercury eventually settles to the bottom of oceans and lakes, where it is converted to dangerous methylmercury by aquatic bacteria, which are eaten by plankton, which are eaten by fish, and bigger fish—with each subsequent meal bioaccumulating in higher levels until apex predators such as tuna and whales carry mercury levels as much as 1 million times higher than the waters around them.

As do we. Epidemiological studies show that mercury levels among Arctic peoples are high enough to cause neurobehavioral effects, while a Hong Kong study revealed that 10 percent of the region’s high school students suffer mercury poisoning from eating tuna and swordfish. The European Union warns pregnant women to limit their consumption of both tuna and swordfish because of brain damage to their unborn children, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration warns pregnant women, lactating women, and young children not to eat swordfish, shark, tilefish, or king mackerel, though the powerful tuna lobby succeeded in keeping tuna off that list. The EPA now estimates at least one in eight American women of childbearing age has unsafe levels of mercury in her blood, and as many as 600,000 of the 4 million babies born in the United States in 2000 were exposed to unacceptable levels because their mothers ate a diet rich in fish (in a continuation of bioaccumulation, the level of mercury in a fetus’ blood can be 70 percent higher than its mother’s). Yet the Bush administration, circumventing the Clean Air Act, has enabled coal-fired power plants to delay curtailing significant mercury emissions until 2018.


IT’S MIDNIGHT OVER THE GULF OF MEXICO, the skies stripped of clouds and glittering with stars as 25-knot winds blow down from the north. For most of the residents of the bayou country of southern Louisiana, these are welcome winds; only a month has passed since Hurricane Katrina made landfall, and 11 days since Hurricane Rita, and these northerlies are cold and dry enough to dismantle any additional tropical storms from the top down. It’s also blowing sufficiently hard that Captain Craig LeBoeuf decides to sail R/V Pelican through the Intracoastal Waterway and out into the Gulf at Morgan City, so that dawn will light our way along the shallow shelf where more than 100 hurricane-broken oil rigs and drilling structures foul the waters.

This once was one of the most prolific bodies of water on earth, a place where the outflow from the Mississippi River introduced freshwater nutrients into a deepwater environment. But long before Katrina, the Gulf had become one of the world’s most polluted marine ecosystems, with mercury loads among the highest ever recorded, including levels in blue marlin 30 times above what the EPA deems safe for human consumption. An average of 10 tons of mercury comes down the Mississippi every year, with close to another ton added by the offshore drilling industry. Equally alarming, a sizable portion of the Gulf is so biologically dysfunctional on a seasonal basis that it’s known as a dead zone—the largest such area in the United States and the second largest on the planet, measuring nearly 8,000 square miles in 2001, an area larger than New Jersey.



 

Post a Comment

Your Name: 

Your Comment: 
 
Please press "Submit" only once to avoid double-posting.
All HTML formatting is removed from comments.
Read the Mother Jones community rules here.

Comments:

How long do you it'll take before were at a point of no return?
Posted by:Melissa AlvarezJune 5, 2007 1:36:21 PMRespond ^
Thank you Julia Whitty for this very deep look into the Ocean, and the not so kind relationship we humans are so profoundly having on it. Your words are filled with wisdom to which we should all pay close attention to before it is to late.
Posted by:SashaJuly 17, 2007 5:40:33 PMRespond ^
What could be the last signs before life ends within Mother Sea ? What are the signs to watch for us who live and work ashore, especiallyfor us deep inside any continents? Life may well survive the Homo sapiens sapiens species. Yet I «pray» for a genetic mutation affecting the whole species, a miracle to have us learn not to polute and kill our only spaceship/home and all life that is connected and that is sustained by Grand Mother Earth, Grand father Sun, Mother Sea and Father Air . A miracle to have us be gardeners instead of suicidal abusers of our host, Grand mother Earth. Was'nt the Homo sapiens species a social animal, (like ants, thermites and bees) Yet survival of the strongest and /or the fittest seems to always bring the Homo sapiens and his developed mind, to use that tool more to eat up or ABUSE at hi$ profit the weakest link of the social chain than to support and reenforce it. Yet I believe we could think of our social chain of life as extending to all living beings ! We are not there yet Another thousand years ?...
Posted by:C C DUBUCAugust 11, 2007 5:08:17 PMRespond ^
Is this required reading for all our politicians and policy makers?
Posted by:Leslie ChristensenAugust 12, 2007 7:51:50 AMRespond ^
I'm sure that the fishing industry and its lobbyists can find experts that will dispute everything in this article.I'm afraid the only way humanity can learn any lessons will be the very hard way.
Posted by:Scott ParsonsAugust 12, 2007 3:42:04 PMRespond ^
How long do you it'll take before were at a point of no return? Posted by:Melissa Alvarez onJune 5, 2007 1:36:21 PM Mellisa, the answer to you question is simple. We're already there. Matt
Posted by:MattAugust 26, 2007 4:08:52 AMRespond ^
Unless the global energy consumption is reduced rapidly—by mid 2006—to levels below 60 exajoules (6E+19 joules) annually (this level is about 12.4 percent of global energy consumption in 2005), our studies show that the runaway positive feedback loops that are destroying Earth’s ecosystems including ozone holes, global heating, extreme climatic events, toxic pollution, resources depletion, war, unethical behavior, and disease pandemics would reach the point of no return and overwhelm our life support systems rendering most of our cities uninhabitable by as early as 2015, possibly earlier. Failure to rein back the global energy consumption to the levels below 60 exajoules annually by June 2006 would render the concept of sustainable management redundant (it seems highly unlikely that post industrial civilization would voluntarily sacrifice its perceived privileges and values in favor of sustaining life on Earth). MSRB is replacing its current program with a disaster rescue operation. http://msrb.wordpress.com/stop-burning-earth/
Posted by:MSRBSeptember 7, 2007 10:39:02 PMRespond ^
The MSRB Index of Human Impact on Nature (HIoN) currently stands at a terminally high level of 171.40 that is 71.4 percent higher than the planet could cope with resulting in the collapse of the population centers by as early as 2015, possibly earlier. http://msrb.wordpress.com/its-1100pm/
Posted by:MSRB -2September 7, 2007 10:41:32 PMRespond ^
Time for us all to think of all life on our planet as one being - LIFE - and for us to realize that we all live together, essentially in one house - one habitat - inter-related, interdependent, and that we all need to : stop breeding, since human overpopulation is the sole reason for the loss of quailty of life on Earth and for the massive and growing pollution (greening a few things won't help at all unles we all go vegan) and also - go vegan - the more people going vegan, the more chance we have for life to continue with any quality at all. Read this: http://environment.newscientis t.com/channel/earth/mg18825304 .800-its-better-to-green-your-diet-than-your-car.html
Posted by:Jake MooreSeptember 10, 2007 2:19:07 PMRespond ^
Great informative & heartfelt program by Julia Whitty. Along with the stark reality of the downfall of nature & our environment here are two thoughts that could be brought into the equation of saving our planet (of course there are many others also!) There are two vital changes for mankind to begin to address these huge problems. One is reduce our population. The second is to convert to vegan, vegetarian diet. I am vegan & know that it is a challenge, but the benefits & increased health are worth the perceived sacrifice. It is the ethic of "ahimsa" or non-violence toward all creatures that share our beautiful planet. It is good for us, the dear creatures & our environment. Thank you all for presenting this vital information. larryskanda@yahoo.com
Posted by:Larry GibsonOctober 31, 2007 9:12:36 AMRespond ^
Thank you for expanding my horizons on the wonderful oceans and what damage has been done by irresponibility, may we all wake up and smell the salty air before it is too late.
Posted by:Paul GrinderJanuary 3, 2008 3:16:39 PMRespond ^
Science has shown the success of no fish zones. These zones repopulate the rest of the ocean. Also, large fish need to be thrown back. They have healthier roe and produce exponentially more roe. By throwing these large healthy fish back we preserve a superior gene pool, produce more fish, and avoid the more polluted older fish as is seen from the contamination of the large and old blue fin tuna. The younger fish also taste better.
Posted by:skarpknutJanuary 27, 2008 11:03:38 PMRespond ^
I had a little casa on the Baja just south of San Felipe Mexico. In the early '80s The brilliant Government of Mexico, for unknown monies, let the Japanese come into these pristine waters with processing ships and trawlers, and within six months you couldn't catch a decent mess of fish. The local Mexican fisherman would go out in their boats to their fishing grounds they had fished for generations and return with only a minuscule remnant of what they had been harvesting for decades. World focus on the endangered oceans is desperately needed but it will be a monumental task to get all the parties in agreement
Posted by:Gary HansonJanuary 29, 2008 2:49:38 PMRespond ^
Oceans need to be stop being polluted!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by:Breanna HauseFebruary 6, 2008 8:04:37 AMRespond ^
why are we not doingany thing to help our oceans
Posted by:kassiApril 25, 2008 10:16:46 AMRespond ^
we aren't doing anything because our goverment sucks
Posted by:loriApril 25, 2008 10:18:04 AMRespond ^

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com
















bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN


This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2006 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS