MOTHER JONES BY E-MAIL

Gone: Mass Extinction and the Hazards of Earth's Vanishing Biodiversity

Page 2 of 7


TOOLS

EmailE-mail article
PrintPrint article




BACKTALK

E-mail the editor





Google


RELATED ARTICLES

RE:ACTION

 

in the final stages of dehydration the body shrinks, robbing youth from the young as the skin puckers, eyes recede into orbits, the tongue swells and cracks. Brain cells shrivel and muscles seize. The kidneys shut down. Blood volume drops, triggering hypovolemic shock, with its attendant respiratory and cardiac failures. These combined assaults disrupt the chemical and electrical pathways of the body until all systems cascade toward death.

Such is also the path of a dying species. Beyond a critical point, the collective body of a unique kind of mammal or bird or amphibian or tree cannot be salvaged, no matter the first aid rendered. Too few individuals spread too far apart or too genetically weakened are susceptible to even small natural disasters. A passing thunderstorm. An unexpected freeze. Drought. At fewer than 50 members, populations experience increasingly random fluctuations until a kind of fatal arrhythmia takes hold. Eventually, an entire genetic legacy, born in the beginnings of life on Earth, is smote from the future.

Scientists recognize that species continually disappear at a background extinction rate estimated at about one species per million species per year, with new species replacing the lost in a sustainable fashion. Occasional mass extinctions convulse this orderly norm, followed by excruciatingly slow recoveries as new species emerge from the remaining gene pool until the world is once again repopulated by a different catalog of flora and fauna. From what we understand so far, five great extinction events have reshaped Earth in cataclysmic ways in the past 439 million years, each one wiping out between 50 and 95 percent of the life of the day, including the dominant lifeforms, the most recent event killing off the non-avian dinosaurs. Speciations followed, but an analysis published in Nature showed that it takes 10 million years before biological diversity even begins to approach what existed before a die-off.

Today we're living through the sixth great extinction, sometimes known as the Holocene extinction event. We carried its seeds with us 50,000 years ago as we migrated beyond Africa with Stone Age blades, darts, and harpoons, entering pristine Ice Age ecosystems and changing them forever by wiping out at least some of the unique megafauna of the times, including, perhaps, the saber-toothed cats and woolly mammoths. When the ice retreated, we terminated the long and biologically rich epoch sometimes called the Edenic period with assaults from our newest weapons: hoes, scythes, cattle, goats, pigs.

But as harmful as our forebears may have been, nothing compares to what's under way today. Throughout the 20th century the causes of extinction—habitat degradation, overexploitation, agricultural monocultures, human-borne invasive species, human-induced climate change—amplified exponentially, until now in the 21st century the rate is nothing short of explosive. The World Conservation Union's Red List—a database measuring the global status of Earth's 1.5 million scientifically named species—tells a haunting tale of unchecked, unaddressed, and accelerating biocide.

When we hear of extinction, most of us think of the plight of the rhino, tiger, panda, or blue whale. But these sad sagas are only small pieces of the extinction puzzle. The overall numbers are terrifying. Of the 40,168 species that the 10,000 scientists in the World Conservation Union have assessed, 1 in 4 mammals, 1 in 8 birds, 1 in 3 amphibians, 1 in 3 conifers and other gymnosperms are at risk of extinction. The peril faced by other classes of organisms is less thoroughly analyzed, but fully 40 percent of the examined species of planet Earth are in danger, including up to 51 percent of reptiles, 52 percent of insects, and 73 percent of flowering plants.

By the most conservative measure—based on the last century's recorded extinctions—the current rate of extinction is 100 times the background rate. But eminent Harvard biologist Edward O. Wilson and other scientists estimate that the true rate is more like 1,000 to 10,000 times the background rate. The actual annual sum is only an educated guess, because no scientist believes the tally of life ends at the 1.5 million species already discovered; estimates range as high as 100 million species on Earth, with 10 million as the median guess. Bracketed between best- and worst-case scenarios, then, somewhere between 2.7 and 270 species are erased from existence every day. Including today.

We now understand that the majority of life on Earth has never been—and will never be—known to us. In a staggering forecast, Wilson predicts that our present course will lead to the extinction of half of all plant and animal species by the year 2100.

You probably had no idea. Few do. A poll by the American Museum of Natural History finds that 7 in 10 biologists believe that mass extinction poses a colossal threat to human existence, a more serious environmental problem than even its contributor, global warming, and that the dangers of mass extinction are woefully underestimated by most everyone outside of science. In the 200 years since French naturalist Georges Cuvier first floated the concept of extinction, after examining fossil bones and concluding "the existence of a world previous to ours, destroyed by some sort of catastrophe," we have only slowly recognized and attempted to correct our own catastrophic behavior.

Some nations move more slowly than others. In 1992, an international summit produced a treaty called the Convention on Biological Diversity that was subsequently ratified by 190 nations—all except the unlikely coalition of the United States, Iraq, the Vatican, Somalia, Andorra, and Brunei. The European Union later called on the world to arrest the decline of species and ecosystems by 2010. Last year, worried biodiversity experts called for establishing a scientific body akin to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to provide a united voice on the extinction crisis and urge governments to action.

Yet despite these efforts, the Red List, updated every two years, continues to show metastatic growth. There are a few heartening examples of so-called Lazarus species lost and then found: the Wollemi pine and the mahogany glider in Australia, the Jerdon's courser in India, the takahe in New Zealand, and, maybe, the ivory-billed woodpecker in the United States. But for virtually all others, the Red List is a dry country with little hope of rain, as species ratchet down the listings from secure to vulnerable to endangered to critically endangered to extinct.

All these disappearing species are part of a fragile membrane of organisms wrapped around Earth so thin, writes E.O. Wilson, that it "cannot be seen edgewise from a space shuttle, yet so internally complex that most species composing it remain undiscovered." We owe everything to this membrane of life. Literally everything. The air we breathe. The food we eat. The materials of our homes, clothes, books, computers, medicines. Goods and services that we can't even imagine we'll someday need will come from species we have yet to identify. The proverbial cure for cancer. The genetic fountain of youth. Immortality. Mortality.

The living membrane we so recklessly destroy is existence itself.

 

Photo: Richard Ross



 

Post a Comment

Your Name: 

Your Comment: 
 
Please press "Submit" only once to avoid double-posting.
All HTML formatting is removed from comments.
Read the Mother Jones community rules here.

Comments:

The trouble is, the facts are fascinating enough without Julia Whitty's colourful embroidery. Thousands of science graduates from countries all over the world, living in the USA and elsewhere, will understand the scientific terms easily if they don't trip over the dance troupe in wooden clogs and the bootlike hooves in the first paragraph. Like I often ask myself when reading " National Geographic" - does this writer really want to share her knowledge with a community of scholars, or is she a novelist manqué? In any case, she appears to believe in the theory of evolution, which everyone knows is pretty manqué too. I'm sorry that Ms.Whitty was born too late to be able to study at the King's Academy in Middlesborough, England - one of Tony Blair's new City Academies - where the principal, Nigel McQuoid, has said of Darwin's theory "if relativist philosophy is acceptable, then sadomasochism, bestiality and self-abuse are to be considered as wholesome activities." ("Red Pepper")In case he should be misunderstood, he also clarified " "the Bible states clearly that homosexuality is against God's design; I would indicate that clearly to young folk." White rhinos obviously took up too much space on the Ark, trampled the shrubbery in the Garden of Eden -and are too horny in any case. Even if they would find self-abuse difficult, they just have to go - it's God's will, don't you see?
Posted by:George WrightMay 28, 2007 5:45:13 AMRespond ^
I appreciate Julia Whitty's care for the species,which as I know happens to include our own. By my way of interpretation, the literature placed here with her name given as the author is intended to be a discussion on species at risk of disappearing from the planet. This has no bearring on "personal" religious views in my opinion, and I certainly am not here reading about species extinction issues so that I can read about one man's religious preferential opinions and/or beliefs. Julia Whittley's article has substance. I found it very enlightening and interesting, and important.
Posted by:Kathleen O'LaneJune 11, 2007 9:21:28 PMRespond ^
um the informative core of the article should shake everyone to their bones and get you up, the survival of our world not some philosophy is at stake
Posted by:gregJune 13, 2007 2:34:10 PMRespond ^
The same rampant unsustainable development that may lead to mass extinctions of plants and animals also seems to be consigning indigenous peoples of the world to oblivion as indigenous lands are taken, and habitat destroyed. When will we read articles about this holocaust?
Posted by:JonJune 15, 2007 2:54:40 PMRespond ^
but by the end I found myself not caring. The article is too long, too stylized, and to built on self-methaninating predispositions towards journalistic "fluff". At page 5 I stopped reading, by page 6 I stopped caring.
Posted by:it started out okayJune 17, 2007 10:17:40 AMRespond ^
This article is very interesting, although it fails to address the personal responsibility of each and every person to protect their environment. The Border fence is going to kill species and make people ingenious as they are, simply dig underneath it to come to the US. I want more practical solutions to this problem. What can I do? Who can I bother? What can we do as voters, as parents, as teachers, and as environmentalists? The cooperative wildlife preservation project is a great idea. The rapid discovery of new species is very encouraging, I just hope they don't all die before our children learn about them.
Posted by:Stephanie AppiahJune 22, 2007 7:40:55 AMRespond ^
Things have been cooling on Gaia for the last eight years or so. Solar scientists expect a little ice age around 2020. Suppose global cooling starts to kill off species? What should be done about it? Burn more coal?
Posted by:M. SimonJune 28, 2007 8:30:45 AMRespond ^
I tend to agree with your concept, & appreciate your(somewhat courageous) position...but if you really do believe in your theory, why do nyou 'lean' on ANY POLITICAL, GOVERNMENTAL, or POPULUS position...they are ALL of a combination of single sided small minds that can only think/learn/observe/discuss/examine/comprehend, one item at a time, thereby voiding the 'GLOBAL "BIG" PICTURE'...'think outside the bun'...ct
Posted by:IrishKid3July 2, 2007 12:57:30 AMRespond ^
So you believe that halfo ft he worlds animals are definently going to die out?
Posted by:JaySeptember 1, 2007 8:49:18 AMRespond ^
If you dislike informative prose on the grounds that it is also poetic and well-crafted literature, maybe you should stop reading Mother Jones and stick to statistics/ scientific journals (they may be dry enough to satisfy your tastes) p.s. what's with the religious rant? you appear to have vastly missed the relevant points.
Posted by:sarahOctober 2, 2007 8:29:20 AMRespond ^
I've yet to find a source for the claim that "half" of all species may be extinct by the end of the century. Not to diminish the implications here, or to be trite, but I've continually found the numbers 15-37%. Not sure if "half" can be considered "a FACT widely accepted by biologists..."
Posted by:ryanOctober 19, 2007 10:56:46 AMRespond ^
ryan: yes, I've seen the same Numbers you have and they refer to the LAST century (ending in 2000)- and turned out to be accurate in retrospect. The "Half" bandied about refers to the continuation of that rate for the next 90 years; check out the World Conservation Union at http://www.iucn.org/ .
Posted by:tre4October 20, 2007 12:12:33 PMRespond ^
Julia Whitty has done an amazing job of writing this article. She isn't just quoting statistics; she's writing from her soul. George: realizing that something is God's will doesn't make incorrect things correct. The holocaust would be attributed to God's will too, right? Does that make it acceptable? The idea is to do your best and leave the rest to God.
Posted by:omer idreesNovember 7, 2007 9:08:28 PMRespond ^
Get to the point, please.
Posted by:Tom OverFebruary 13, 2008 5:27:40 PMRespond ^
Put it all on one page so i can read it!
Posted by:wjioaviuaweiotaeApril 11, 2008 12:43:42 PMRespond ^
I'd rather listen to a white rhino than a george wright any day of the week
Posted by:tbApril 21, 2008 1:55:15 PMRespond ^

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com
















bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN


This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2007 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS