MOTHER JONES BY E-MAIL

Gone: Mass Extinction and the Hazards of Earth's Vanishing Biodiversity

Page 3 of 7


TOOLS

EmailE-mail article
PrintPrint article




BACKTALK

E-mail the editor





Google


RELATED ARTICLES

RE:ACTION

biodiversity is defined as the sum of an area's genes (the building blocks of inheritance), species (organisms that can interbreed), and ecosystems (amalgamations of species in their geological and chemical landscapes). The richer an area's biodiversity, the tougher its immune system, since biodiversity includes not only the number of species but also the number of individuals within that species, and all the inherent genetic variation—life's only army against the diseases of oblivion.

Yet it's a mistake to think that critical genetic pools exist only in the gaudy show of the coral reefs, or the cacophony of the rainforest. Although a hallmark of the desert is the sparseness of its garden, the orderly progression of plants, the understated camouflage of its animals, this is only an illusion. Turn the desert inside out and upside down and you'll discover its true nature. Escaping drought and heat, life goes underground in a tangled overexuberance of roots and burrows reminiscent of a rainforest canopy, competing for moisture, not light. Animal trails crisscross this subterranean realm in private burrows engineered, inhabited, stolen, shared, and fought over by ants, beetles, wasps, cicadas, tarantulas, spiders, lizards, snakes, mice, squirrels, rats, foxes, tortoises, badgers, and coyotes.

To survive the heat and drought that killed the lost hiker, desert life pioneers ingenious solutions. Coyotes dig and maintain coyote wells in arroyos, probing deep for water. White-winged doves use their bodies as canteens, drinking enough when the opportunity arises to increase their body weight by more than 15 percent. Black-tailed jackrabbits tolerate internal temperatures of 111 degrees. Western box turtles store water in their oversized bladders and urinate on themselves to stay cool. Mesquite grows taproots more than 160 feet deep in search of perennial moisture.

These life-forms and their life strategies compose what we might think of as the "body" of the desert, with some species acting the role of the lungs and others the liver, the blood, the skin. The trend in scientific investigation in recent decades has been toward understanding the interconnectedness of the bodily components, i.e., the effect one species has on the others. The loss of even one species irrevocably changes the desert (or the tundra, rainforest, prairie, coastal estuary, kelp forest, coral reef, and so on) as we know it, just as the loss of each human being changes his or her family forever.

Nowhere is this better proven than in a 12-year study conducted in the Chihuahuan Desert by James H. Brown and Edward Heske of the University of New Mexico. When a kangaroo rat guild composed of three closely related species was removed, shrublands quickly converted to grasslands, which supported fewer annual plants, which in turn supported fewer birds. Even humble players mediate stability. So when you and I hear of this year's extinction of the Yangtze River dolphin, and think, how sad, we're not calculating the deepest cost: that extinctions lead to co-extinctions because most every living thing on Earth supports a few symbionts and hitchhikers, while keystone species influence and support a myriad of plants and animals. Army ants, for example, are known to support 100 known species, from beetles to birds. A European study finds steep declines in honeybee diversity in the last 25 years but also significant attendant declines in plants that depend on bees for pollination—a job estimated to be worth $92 billion worldwide. Meanwhile, beekeepers in 24 American states report that up to 70 percent of their colonies have recently died off, threatening $14 billion in U.S. agriculture. And bees are only a small part of the pollinator crisis.

One of the most alarming developments is the rapid decline not just of species but of higher taxa, such as the class Amphibia, the 300-million-year-old group of frogs, salamanders, newts, and toads hardy enough to have preceded and then outlived most dinosaurs. Biologists first noticed die-offs two decades ago, and since have watched as seemingly robust amphibian species vanished in as little as six months. The causes cover the spectrum of human environmental assaults, including rising ultraviolet radiation from a thinning ozone layer, increases in pollutants and pesticides, habitat loss from agriculture and urbanization, invasions of exotic species, the wildlife trade, light pollution, and fungal diseases. Sometimes stressors merge to form an unwholesome synergy; an African frog brought to the West in the 1950s for use in human pregnancy tests likely introduced a fungus deadly to native frogs. Meanwhile, a recent analysis in Nature estimates that in the last 20 years at least 70 species of South American frogs have gone extinct as a result of climate change.

In a 2004 analysis published in Science, author Lian Pin Koh and colleagues predict that an initially modest co-extinction rate will climb alarmingly as host extinctions rise in the near future. Graphed out, the forecast mirrors the rising curve of an infectious disease, with the human species acting all the parts: the pathogen, the vector, the Typhoid Mary who refuses culpability, and, ultimately, one of up to 100 million victims.

 

it's one of science's great ironies that many of today's feel-good nature stories come from researchers scrambling to catalog Earth's life-forms before they disappear. Breaking through the daily news of war and politics are the quiet announcements of novel species, including truly startling finds: a new catlike mammal in Borneo, a new phylum of wormlike creature, a new songbird in India, a snake that changes colors. Most astounding are the marine discoveries, including an average of three new species of fish a week since 2000.

The discovery of novel oceanic life-forms comes thanks to the Census of Marine Life, a network of 2,000 researchers in more than 80 nations engaged in a 10-year initiative to assess ocean life and its changes over time. The census is a veritable factory of revelations: life-forms thriving in 765-degree-Fahrenheit thermal vent waters in the Atlantic; species surviving below 2,300 feet of ice off Antarctica; a living shrimp believed extinct for 50 million years; pairs of mated seabirds flying 44,000-mile, figure-eight loops in the 200 days between nesting seasons, only occasionally resting on the waves; a fish school 20 million strong, the size of Manhattan, swimming off New Jersey.

The quest reveals a startling truth about our planet: that life thrives even in "lifeless" conditions, harvesting energy from sources we thought were ours alone—radioactive uranium, hydrogen, hydrogen sulfide, and methane—in places no one ever thought to look before, including between the crystals in rock. Some (archaea, bacteria, fungi) live nearly two miles below the Earth's surface. Some (cyanobacteria) in Antarctica live inside quartz clear enough to allow them to perform photosynthesis while escaping the weather. We call these organisms extremophiles because their worlds are uninhabitable to us, although many dwell in conditions that mimic what we know of the first life on Earth—in the eons before photosynthesizing plants freed oxygen from water to make our atmosphere.

On Hydrate Ridge 50 miles off the coast of Oregon, the mud on the bottom of the sea is more alive than dead. Thousands of feet below the surface, under pressures that would crush you and me, in temperatures that would turn our blood to sludge, worms, crustaceans, snails, bacterial filaments, and other life-forms as yet undescribed thrive in an environment largely devoid of oxygen and toxic with hydrogen sulfide and methane. This is the world of a cold seep, a seafloor ecosystem not discovered until 1984, where hydrocarbon-rich fluids bubble from the bottom to support unique biological communities fundamentally different from our own.

Seep life is driven not by photosynthesis (where plants use sunlight to power the food web) but chemosynthesis, whereby single-celled organisms use methane and hydrogen sulfide to fuel a gas-powered food web. The process also creates underwater reefs of carbonate rocks, something like coral reefs, which shelter otherworldly communities, including tubeworms with minimum life spans of 170 years. Scattered erratically across the bottom, cold seeps and their cousins, the hydrothermal vents, are the ocean's deepest, farthest flung, and perhaps most ancient communities.

Among their more enduring mysteries are exactly how these ecosystems become populated with life. There's evidence that whale falls act as critical steppingstones, or once did. In preindustrialized whaling days, when millions of behemoths were alive at any given time, their carcasses—which may endure and produce gases for up to a century—would have abounded in the deep, providing oases for the drifting larvae of seep organisms.

Most of the extremophile life-forms living at Hydrate Ridge are invisible to the naked eye—though through the dissecting microscope they're mind-bendingly huge: translucent worms with blood cells chasing each other through their vessels; miniature crustaceans like the alien from Alien. The mud from the seep reeks of sulfur. In fact the whole ship, the hardworking, far-sailing research vessel Atlantis, is full of mud that stinks of rotten eggs and flatulence. The goop comes aboard via the submersible Alvin, which cruises 2,500 feet below in a world so remote and so unwelcoming that only three people at a time can get to it in undersea assignments as coveted as space shuttle berths.

Photo: Richard Ross



 

Post a Comment

Your Name: 

Your Comment: 
 
Please press "Submit" only once to avoid double-posting.
All HTML formatting is removed from comments.
Read the Mother Jones community rules here.

Comments:

The trouble is, the facts are fascinating enough without Julia Whitty's colourful embroidery. Thousands of science graduates from countries all over the world, living in the USA and elsewhere, will understand the scientific terms easily if they don't trip over the dance troupe in wooden clogs and the bootlike hooves in the first paragraph. Like I often ask myself when reading " National Geographic" - does this writer really want to share her knowledge with a community of scholars, or is she a novelist manqué? In any case, she appears to believe in the theory of evolution, which everyone knows is pretty manqué too. I'm sorry that Ms.Whitty was born too late to be able to study at the King's Academy in Middlesborough, England - one of Tony Blair's new City Academies - where the principal, Nigel McQuoid, has said of Darwin's theory "if relativist philosophy is acceptable, then sadomasochism, bestiality and self-abuse are to be considered as wholesome activities." ("Red Pepper")In case he should be misunderstood, he also clarified " "the Bible states clearly that homosexuality is against God's design; I would indicate that clearly to young folk." White rhinos obviously took up too much space on the Ark, trampled the shrubbery in the Garden of Eden -and are too horny in any case. Even if they would find self-abuse difficult, they just have to go - it's God's will, don't you see?
Posted by:George WrightMay 28, 2007 5:45:13 AMRespond ^
I appreciate Julia Whitty's care for the species,which as I know happens to include our own. By my way of interpretation, the literature placed here with her name given as the author is intended to be a discussion on species at risk of disappearing from the planet. This has no bearring on "personal" religious views in my opinion, and I certainly am not here reading about species extinction issues so that I can read about one man's religious preferential opinions and/or beliefs. Julia Whittley's article has substance. I found it very enlightening and interesting, and important.
Posted by:Kathleen O'LaneJune 11, 2007 9:21:28 PMRespond ^
um the informative core of the article should shake everyone to their bones and get you up, the survival of our world not some philosophy is at stake
Posted by:gregJune 13, 2007 2:34:10 PMRespond ^
The same rampant unsustainable development that may lead to mass extinctions of plants and animals also seems to be consigning indigenous peoples of the world to oblivion as indigenous lands are taken, and habitat destroyed. When will we read articles about this holocaust?
Posted by:JonJune 15, 2007 2:54:40 PMRespond ^
but by the end I found myself not caring. The article is too long, too stylized, and to built on self-methaninating predispositions towards journalistic "fluff". At page 5 I stopped reading, by page 6 I stopped caring.
Posted by:it started out okayJune 17, 2007 10:17:40 AMRespond ^
This article is very interesting, although it fails to address the personal responsibility of each and every person to protect their environment. The Border fence is going to kill species and make people ingenious as they are, simply dig underneath it to come to the US. I want more practical solutions to this problem. What can I do? Who can I bother? What can we do as voters, as parents, as teachers, and as environmentalists? The cooperative wildlife preservation project is a great idea. The rapid discovery of new species is very encouraging, I just hope they don't all die before our children learn about them.
Posted by:Stephanie AppiahJune 22, 2007 7:40:55 AMRespond ^
Things have been cooling on Gaia for the last eight years or so. Solar scientists expect a little ice age around 2020. Suppose global cooling starts to kill off species? What should be done about it? Burn more coal?
Posted by:M. SimonJune 28, 2007 8:30:45 AMRespond ^
I tend to agree with your concept, & appreciate your(somewhat courageous) position...but if you really do believe in your theory, why do nyou 'lean' on ANY POLITICAL, GOVERNMENTAL, or POPULUS position...they are ALL of a combination of single sided small minds that can only think/learn/observe/discuss/examine/comprehend, one item at a time, thereby voiding the 'GLOBAL "BIG" PICTURE'...'think outside the bun'...ct
Posted by:IrishKid3July 2, 2007 12:57:30 AMRespond ^
So you believe that halfo ft he worlds animals are definently going to die out?
Posted by:JaySeptember 1, 2007 8:49:18 AMRespond ^
If you dislike informative prose on the grounds that it is also poetic and well-crafted literature, maybe you should stop reading Mother Jones and stick to statistics/ scientific journals (they may be dry enough to satisfy your tastes) p.s. what's with the religious rant? you appear to have vastly missed the relevant points.
Posted by:sarahOctober 2, 2007 8:29:20 AMRespond ^
I've yet to find a source for the claim that "half" of all species may be extinct by the end of the century. Not to diminish the implications here, or to be trite, but I've continually found the numbers 15-37%. Not sure if "half" can be considered "a FACT widely accepted by biologists..."
Posted by:ryanOctober 19, 2007 10:56:46 AMRespond ^
ryan: yes, I've seen the same Numbers you have and they refer to the LAST century (ending in 2000)- and turned out to be accurate in retrospect. The "Half" bandied about refers to the continuation of that rate for the next 90 years; check out the World Conservation Union at http://www.iucn.org/ .
Posted by:tre4October 20, 2007 12:12:33 PMRespond ^
Julia Whitty has done an amazing job of writing this article. She isn't just quoting statistics; she's writing from her soul. George: realizing that something is God's will doesn't make incorrect things correct. The holocaust would be attributed to God's will too, right? Does that make it acceptable? The idea is to do your best and leave the rest to God.
Posted by:omer idreesNovember 7, 2007 9:08:28 PMRespond ^
Get to the point, please.
Posted by:Tom OverFebruary 13, 2008 5:27:40 PMRespond ^
Put it all on one page so i can read it!
Posted by:wjioaviuaweiotaeApril 11, 2008 12:43:42 PMRespond ^
I'd rather listen to a white rhino than a george wright any day of the week
Posted by:tbApril 21, 2008 1:55:15 PMRespond ^
the world is gonna end on 06/05/08
Posted by:godMay 14, 2008 11:07:55 AMRespond ^

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com
















bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN


This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2007 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS